At UN, Ban's Iran Answer Is Banned from
Transcripts, Darfur Contacts Denied, Understaffing Unexplained
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, April 20 -- The UN puts online
transcripts of its press briefings and Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's
now
once-a-month interactions with the press. But the transcripts are
cleaned up
and altered, as can be seen be comparing the real time video to the
subsequent
transcript. On April 15, Ban was asked a question about the situation
in Iraq
and an upcoming meeting in Kuwait. Video here,
at Minute 13:25. Ban responded about Iraq's
neighbor, Iran, that "Iranian authorities should fully comply with the
most relevant Security Council resolutions," adding that he is
"satisfied
with the progress" of Iranian authorities in complying with the
International Atomic Energy Agency. Video here,
from Minute 13:35. Then his spokesperson Michele
Montas whispered that the question had concerned not Iran but Iraq, and
Ban
gave a brief answer, which is the only part of
the answer that the UN's
transcript includes:
Q: What are your comments on the
situation in Iraq, and what would be your message to Iraq's neighbors
who are
meeting next week in Kuwait?
SG: This is going to be a very
important meeting. Unfortunately for me, I will not be able to
participate in
person, because of a scheduling problem. As I said, I am going to visit
African
countries exactly on that day, therefore I am going to dispatch
Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Mr. B. Lynn Pascoe. But
I am
going to convene, and myself preside over an International Compact with
Iraq
[meeting] in late May, May 29th , in Stockholm.
Ban's
responses about Iran, clearly visible on the video, are simply excised
from the
UN's written transcript.
Inner City Press: Anyone can make a mistake. But if
this gets erased, what
else is being
concealed?
Mr. Ban on April 15, Iran response not shown,
Olympics
questions not taken
Also
this past week, the UN Spokesperson's office in response to questions
from
Inner City Press denied published reports of a South Korean advance
team in
Darfur, exploring that country providing peacekeepers there. On April
15 Inner
City Press asked Ms. Montas -- according to the transcript -- whether
she could
either confirm or
find out if South Korea has sent military advisors to Darfur with an
eye
towards joining the UNAMID force? Is that the case?
Spokesperson: I
can try to get the information for you.
[The Spokesperson
later confirmed that the Republic of Korea has not sent military
advisers to
Darfur.]
But
the Korea Times quotes
a ministry of national defense spokesman that four
officials went to Darfur on April 11:
The government dispatched an on-site
inspection team Friday to Sudan's Darfur region to prepare for the
possible
deployment of peacekeeping troops there, an official of the Ministry of
National Defense (MND) said. The team, involving officials of the MND,
the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade will
conduct a
week-long inspection of the security conditions for South Korea's
possible
contribution to international efforts to maintain peace in the region,
the
official said on condition of anonymity. 'The team will meet with
officials of
the Sudanese government and the U.N.-African Union peacekeeping force
(UNAMID)
to discuss South Korean troops' presence in the region,' the official
told
reporters."
On
April 16, Inner
City Press again asked Ms.
Montas
In the meeting with
President Lee, did they discuss the idea of South Korea become part of
the
UNAMID force?
Spokesperson:
No, what they had discussed would be support on the part of the
Republic of
Korea on peacekeeping operations in general.
Inner City Press: There
was story
in South Korean press that there was a team of four South Korean
military people in Darfur, trying to scope out whether they could be a
troop
contributing country.
Spokesperson: I
cannot confirm that.
We'll see.
Bigger picture on Darfur, Inner City Press asked
Question: I was
told that, in terms of the civilian international staff that UNAMID is
hiring
in Darfur, that, thus far, 30 per cent of the posts that have been
approved by
the General Assembly have been filled. Is that because it is hard
to find
people, or are they only staffing up as peacekeepers arrive? What
is the
relation between those posts and the arrival of the peacekeepers?
Spokesperson: I
can get the details for you.
We'll be
waiting -- we'll have more on this story, watch this site.
* * *
These reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|