Undisclosed Ban Meetings on 2d Term, Burma Business,
Sell Out of Rights?
September 29, 2010 -- The accuracy of the UN's 100 readouts
of meetings of Secretary General Ban Ki-moon with national leaders in
the past week was cast
into doubt Wednesday when Ban adviser Nicholas
Haysom admitted a separate unsummarized meeting between Ban and Sri
Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
in the tete a
tete meeting did Ban raise the issue of the UN panel on war crimes in
Sri Lanka. This was not included in the purported read out of Ban -
asked Haysom how many of Ban's bilateral contacts included separate
one on one meetings without advisers present. One in ten, Haysom
said, or one in twenty.
spokesman Martin Nesirky took questions, Inner City Press asked for a
list of which of the 100 Ban meetings for which Nesirky's office
issued read outs had included tete a tete sessions, and for summaries
of what issues Ban raised in these sessions. Nesirky refuses to
provide this information.
how is one to
know which read outs are incomplete? Perusing the list of Ban's
summarized bilateral meetings, some jump out are potentially
involving issues not included in the read out:
the Afghan National Forces of Hamid Karzai murdered UN staff
member Louis Maxwell, but Afghanistan has failed to conduct the
investigation ostensibly called for the UN board of inquiry belatedly
established after cell phone footage leaked, could this issue have
envoy in Darfur Ibrahim Gambari has until now allowed the
government to deny permission for peacekeepers to leave their bases
to protect civilians. Ban told Inner City Press at a stakeout that he
would work on this, but has said little publicly since. Was this
discussed in any tete a tete meeting with Sudanese vice president Ali
UN's Ban & Goodluck Jonathan, Ban secret meeting
North Korea: Ban while South Korean minister of foreign affairs
and trade had many dealings with North Korea, regarding which his
closest spokesperson has refused to make disclosure.
publicly praised strongman Islam Karimov, even as he forced
people back across the border into Kyrgyzstan, while locking up
others. Might Ban have belated raised this issue, or the
incarceration of anti-AIDS activist Maxim Popov for distributing a UN
system funded pamphlet, in a tete a tete meeting?
he was South Korean minister of foreign affairs and trade, Ban
praised a Daewoo pipeline across Burma as a “win - win situation.”
Inner City Press has asked Ban's Office if he still has this view of
standardless investment in the military regime, but has gotten no
answer. Could this have been discussed in a tete a tete meeting?
Haysom's “one in twenty” of 100 bilaterals. Under his “one in
ten” formula, on which Nesirky refused to provide any further
information, Ban could have had tete a tete's with each of the
Permanent Five members of the Security Council, any one of which
could veto a second term by Ban, as the U.S. did to Boutros Ghali...
* * *
Confined Mention His Sri Lanka War Crimes Panel to Secret Unsummarized
"Tete a Tete" Meeting with Rajapaksa
Russell Lee, Exclusive
September 29, 2010 -- Five days after UN
Ban Ki-moon and Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa met and then
issued different summaries of their meeting, Inner City Press asked
Ban adviser Nicholas Hayson to explain the discrepancy.
that after the “open” meeting between the two men, which included
advisers including Haysom, there was a “tete a tete” meeting, one
on one, which the UN did not include in its purported summary of the
asked how many of Ban's bilateral meetings include separate one on
one discussions. One in ten, Haysom estimated. Inner City Press
asked, why not include the contents or at least topics of these rare
addendum to meetings in the UN's summaries? Haysom defended the
omissions, saying that these tete a tete meetings often included
“staff issues” or other private issues.
Spokesman Martin Nesirky pointedly cut off follow up questions, it is
amazing that the UN would now claim that the issue, even the name, of
its panel on accountability in Sri Lanka is a private or secret
The "open" meeting
if it is so
secret, why allow Rajapaksa to publicly make representations about
the “private” portion of the meeting, and then have no response?
Inner City Press wrote
about the discrepancy over the weekend, and
asked about it on Monday, September 27. Nesirky declined to comment
on what the President said, despite the fact that it calls into
question the completeness and even accuracy of the other summaries
his Office has issued -- or at least one tenth of them. Watch this
Quotes UN Ban Undermining His Panel on War Crimes, UN Questioned
26 -- Shortly after the spokesman for UN Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon issued
a “read out” of Ban's September 24
meeting with Sri Lanka's Mahinda Rajapaksa which did not mention the
UN panel on war crimes in Sri Lanka, Rajapaksa issued a statement
that Ban told him the UN panel is “in
way empowered to
investigate charges against Sri Lanka.”
at least arise. First, if Ban did in fact say this to
Rajapaksa about the UN panel, why did Ban's read out mention only
Rajapaksa own commission, and not the UN's? Can one believe in and
rely on the UN's summary of Ban's meetings?
what Rajapaksa attributes to him, isn't this totally undermining any
power the panel had?
didn't say this, when is the UN going to request a retraction or
correction from the Sri Lankan government?
Press reported on September 24, the UN's summary of Ban's Sri Lanka
meeting took significantly longer to issue than their summary of
their meeting with the President of Nigeria, Ban's meeting just
understanding of the process, from the shifting explanations given by
UN officials, is that if a summary only includes what Ban said, it is
issued without conferring with the government he met with.
like the September 24 UN summary of Ban's meeting with President
Rajapaksa, includes something that the President said, it is a
“joint” statement, negotiated and agree to with the government.
In these cases, both sides -- UN and government -- are supposed to
issue the same agreed to statement.
as it has done
before, Sri Lanka got Ban to issue an inordinately positive, some
think inaccurate “joint” summary -- and then nevertheless issued
their own summary, including a quote in which Ban undermines the
mandate of his own panel.
will the UN
respond? Watch this site.
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon had yesterday told President Mahinda
Rajapaksa in New York for the sessions of the UN General Assembly
that his committee on Sri Lanka ``was in no way empowered to
investigate charges against Sri Lanka, but was solely to advice him
on matters relating to Sri Lanka,’’ according to a news release
from the president’s office.”
to Ban's own
the Secretary-General's meeting with President Rajapaksa
of Sri Lanka
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply
To: [Inner City]
Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:42 PM
Subject: Readout of
the Secretary-General's meeting with President Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka
Secretary-General’s meeting with President Rajapaksa of Sri
with President Rajapaksa focused on
the need to move forward expeditiously on outstanding issues covered
in the joint statement of May 2009, particularly a political
settlement, reconciliation and accountability. The Secretary-General
underlined that the President’s strong political mandate provided a
unique opportunity to deliver on his commitments to address these
issues. The President underlined that development and education in
the North were integral to national reconciliation. He gave examples
of progress made on reconstruction and rehabilitation efforts in this
updated the Secretary-General on the work of the Lessons Learnt and
And what about the answers promised
long ago by Ban's spokesman Nesirky about Ban's personal relationship
with Rajapaksa, including prior to becoming Secretary General? Watch
* * *
Sri Lanka Rajajaksa, UN War Crimes Panel Not Mentioned
24 -- When Mahinda Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka met with
the UN's Ban Ki-moon on Friday morning, Ban did not raise the slow
starting UN panel of experts on war crimes in the country.
after the meeting, the UN issued a terse summary of what was
discussed. It mentions only Rajapaksa's own “Lessons Learnt”
panel, and not the UN's.
covering the meeting on Sudan later on Friday with a “free range”
UN pass, noted Sir Lanka's Minister of External Affairs G.L. Peiris
seated on the
North Lawn's second floor, reading.
trip inside the UN, Peiris refused to take any questions from the
Press. In Washington, he walked out of a session at the National
Press Club when he thought tough questions might be asked.
Rajapaksa have scheduled any press availability at the UN, unlike,
only on Friday, the Presidents of Bolivia, Cyprus and Nigeria, to all
of whom Inner City Press asked questions.
Nigeria's Goodluck Jonathan before he met with Rajapaksa, the UN's
summary of the Nigeria meeting was issued hours before the Sri Lanka
one. Does this reflect greater checking with or push back by Sri
Lanka? Or, some ask, ineptitude in the UN's Sri Lanka team?
Its last read
about Sri Lanka came out at 10 p.m. When Inner City Press asked if
it had been checked with the government, spokesman Martin Nesirky
said no, there had just been a technical snafu. But how come a snafu
on Friday as to Sri Lanka, and not Nigeria? Watch this site.
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.