UNITED NATIONS
GATE, May
2 – As things
further deteriorated
in Benin on
April 29 Inner City
Press asked UN
Secretary General Anton
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
it in
writing: "April
29-3: On
Benin, scam
elections and
Internet shut
downs, what is
the SG's
comment and
action if any
on the
Internet
shutdown in
Benin as the
country holds
parliamentary
elections
without
opposition
parties?"
Dujarric,
who for
Guterres and
others got
Inner City
Press roughed
up and banned
refused to
answer,
despite his on
camera promiseto do so.
Now a full
three days late
with things
further
deteriorated in
Benin,
Dujarric is
said to have
answered some
undefined
other's
request for
comment by
e-mail. Too
late, too corrupt.
Dujarric
should be fired,
and Guterres
should be
impeached.
Inner
City Press on July 5 was
banned from entering the
UN, the day after it
filed a criminal
complaint against UN
Security for physically
removing it from
covering the meeting
about the UN Secretary
General Antonio
Guterres' $6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget, as
witnessed and
essentially cheered on
by senior UN official
Christian Saunders,
tearing its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally twisting
his arm and slamming
shut and damaging his
laptop. On August 17,
Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale issued a letter
banning Inner City Press
from the UN - for life.
With no due process. She
and Guterres have put
the UN in the US Press
Freedom Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN would
answer Press questions
to the Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric and
his Office; Dujarric said the
same on
camera.
On April
29 three
hours
before Dujarric
held a UN
noon briefing where
he joked with
his insiders
and said there
should be a
reality show
about them at
UNCA, Inner
City Press submitted
765 questions, including why
it continues to be
lawlessly banned
from entering to ask
questions in person:
"There are more
than 500+
questions UNanswered.
And Monday Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept 18, Wed
Sept 19 and Thurs
and Fri Sept 21, that
whole week, no questions
answered. Nor Sept 25,
nor 28th - nor October 2
nor 3. While
appreciating and using
what was sent on March
28 in partial request to
Inner City Press'
questions about the UN
bribery sentence of
Patrick Ho of CEFC and
CEFC's 2018 attempt to
buy the oil company of
Gulbenkian Foundation
which paid the SG, no
answers on Dec 17 or 18
or 19 or 20 or 21 -
another FIVE days in a
row, even as SG's direct
conflicts of interest
and failure to disclose
emerge, and a newest
low. No answers on
January 30 nor 31 nor
February 1 nor 4 nor 5
nor 6 nor 7 nor 11 nor
12 nor 13 nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19 nor 20 nor
21 nor 22 nor 25 nor 26
nor 27 nor March 1 - 27
(!) And
now April
1, 3-26.
No answers at all during
those four days of the
US v Ho trial showing
corruption in the UN
says it all. This ban is
just censorship - and
Inner City Press must be
allowed back into the
noon briefing to ask its
questions in person and
follow up on them.
April
29-1: On Cameroon, what
is the SG's comment and
action if any on the
killing of civilians
including children by
Paul Biya's arm in the
SW village of Ikata on
April 26?
April
29-2: On the
just-published Public
Financial Disclosures
for 2017, as a first
question, please state
why Nicholas Haysum is
not even on the list.
Did he decline to make
any public disclosure?
Why has Guterres changed
the previous system in a
which a "choosing not to
disclose" statement was
upload and listed, to
one which helps conceal
who reports and who does
not? Again, state
why considering the UN
bribery conviction of
Patrick Ho of CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt to
purchase the oil company
of Gulbenkian Foundation
which paid Mr. Guterres
in 2016 was omitted from
his online public
financial disclosure
covering 2016, and why
Guterres has not even
started an audit of CEFC
in the UN.
April
29-3: On Benin, scam
elections and Internet
shut downs, what is the
SG's comment and action
if any on the
Internet shutdown in
Benin as the country
holds parliamentary
elections without
opposition
parties?
April
29-4: Given the use of
public money, please
state who while the SG
was in or en route back
from China on Saturday
April 27 was inside the
Sutton Place mansion,
why the limousine with
diplomatic plates
awaiting pulled twice
into the cul de sac on
Sutton Place, and who
has access to this
mansion when Mr.
Guterres is away.
April
29-5: On Myanmar, what
is the SG's comment and
action if any on that on
April 22, Yangon’s
Mayangone Township Court
ordered five members of
the Peacock Generation
Thangyat troupe detained
without bail for their
satirical performance,
traditionally performed
during Myanmar’s April
New Year holiday. Kay
Khine Tun, Zayar Lwin,
Paing Ye Thu, Paing Phyo
Min, and Pho Thar were
sent to Insein Prison on
charges under penal code
section 505(a), which
makes it a crime to make
any statement “with
intent to cause, or
which is likely to
cause, any officer,
soldier, sailor or
airman in the Army, Navy
or Air Force to mutiny
or otherwise disregard
or fail in his duty as
such.” They face up to
two years in prison and
a fine. Police had
previously arrested
three of the five
Peacock Generation
members on April 15,
along with another
member Su Yadanar Myint,
and charged them with
violating section 66(d)
of the
Telecommunications Law.
The four, who had posted
a livestream of their
performance on Facebook
that was then shared on
YouTube, had been
released on bail.
Up to 25 more members of
the Peacock Generation
Thangyat troupe have
been reportedly sued
under section 66(d)
since April 23, but
their names have not
been released. The
troupe members are to
appear in court on April
29.
April
29-6: On press freedom
and Uganda, what is the
SG's comment and action
if any on the assault,
by a Kampala court
registrar no less, on
journalists from Salt
Media and Smart
24? What is each
of yours - particularly
the SG's - response to
the letter written and
sent by Burundi activist
Manisha Lievin? To the
April 15 letter to the
SG, DSG and USG Smale
for which receipt has
not even been
acknowledged, other than
a single lawless line
from MALU: "Your media
accreditation request,
with reference no:
M66561081, has been
declined"? This is a
formal request for the
UN's explanation of
grounds for this denied,
and since SGcentral, the
SG's chief of staff and
Deputy SG and USG Smale
haven't even confirmed
receipt of the April 15
letter much less
responded, for
reconsideration. AGAIN,
immediately explain how
it is legitimate to ban
from enter into the UN
the media that has been
asking about these and
other questions, with no
hearing or appeal.
April
26-1: Now that SG
Guterres has lavished
praise on China's "Belt
and Road" please
immediately state how
much Guterres and team's
trip to China is
costing, the size and
composition of the UN
delegation, and who is
paying for it (given
that even the PGA now
discloses this
information).
Again, state whether
after the UN bribery
conviction of Patrick Ho
of CEFC, and CEFC's
attempt to purchase the
oil company of
Gulbenkian Foundation
which paid Mr. Guterres
in 2016 (omitted from
his online public
financial disclosure
covering 2016), he
intends to raise
corruption and UN
bribery issues with
China.
April
25-5: On Mozambique what
is the SG's comment and
action if any on the
sexual exploitation of
Cyclone Idai victims by
local officials, some
linked to the ruling
Frelimo party, demanding
money from people
affected by the cyclone
in exchange for
including their names on
the aid distribution
list? In some cases,
women without money were
instead coerced into
engaging in sex with
local leaders in
exchange for a bag of
rice. Again, where is
the if-asked information
on all the new UN sexual
exploitation and abuse
cases so far only
partially
disclosed?
April
24-3: In Cameroon, what
is the role of the UN in
propping up ELECAM even
as non violent opponents
of Paul Biya are jailed?
What has the SG done
about that, after he
took the golden statue
in Yaounde and met about
Budget Committee favors
repeatedly with Biya
Ambassador Tommo
Monthe?
April
23-3: On Iran and human
rights, what is SG
Guterres' comment and
action on the
reiteration of the
13-year prison sentence
of human rights attorney
Mohammad Najafi who was
jailed in 2018 after
voicing support for
people detained during
anti-government
protests? Najafi was
sentenced in December to
10 years for “conveying
information to a hostile
country” through
interviews with foreign
media, two years for
insulting the supreme
leader and one year for
publicly supporting
opposition groups.
Mohammad Najafi had been
imprisoned since October
28, 2018, for informing
media outlets about the
suspicious case of Vahid
Heydari, 22, who died in
detention at the 12th
Police Station in Arak.
That on April 16, 2019,
Branch 2 of the
Prosecutor’s Office in
Tehran’s Evin prison
issued an indictment
against Amir Salar
Davoudi on charges of
“cooperating with
hostile
governments"?
April
22-5: What is the status
of OIOS head Heidi
Mendoza? Is she still on
medical leave, despite
having flown to New York
for an event at the
Filipino
consulate?
April
4-2: On UN bribery and
censorship, what now is
the SG's comment and
response to the April
3article in Serbia about
CEFC which Mr Guterres
has refused to audit -
and about his refusal to
answer, and censorship
of Press "Gutereš had
and had his own
financial link with the
CEFC, through the
Gulbenkian Foundation.
On the orders of
Guteres, on June 22 and
July 3, 2018, the
security came to me, and
I was banned from
reporting from the UN.
In fact, Gutereš took
advantage of his
security from the UN to
distance me from his
speech at the Park East
Synagogue, and recently
physically stopped me
while he entered the
mosque in 96th
Street" and now this
- "Patrick
Ho, a businessman who
was sentenced to three
years in prison for his
role in the world's
corrupting affair,
claims investigative
journalist Matthew
Russell Li in the
documentary "Hong Kong
Connection, Patrick Ho's
List." Li, in a
documentary broadcast on
the Hong Kong
Radio-Television portal,
revealed Jeremic's role
in this affair, a tens
of millions of dollars,
as well as his private
dilutes, which he made
while serving as the
chairman of the United
Nations General
Assembly. -
Jeremic's testimony at
the Ho trial was
problematic because he
turned out to be working
for "CEFC Energy" (a
Chinese conglomerate led
by Ho, prim. Aut.) While
serving as the chairman
of the UN General
Assembly. He took their
money, exchanged e-mails
with them ... He did
many things. It is
surprising to me that
the focus of the
prosecution was at Ho.
The prosecutors used his
testimony to show how Ho
established a
relationship, and in
fact what Jeremic was
doing might be worse for
the public - Li
said.
Investigative reporters
also uncovered the flows
of money flowing to
Jeremic's accounts. Hoov
CEFC paid Jeremic as a
consultant a total of $
5.3 million. It turns
out that some companies
that paid this money are
completely phantom,
because they do not
exist at the registered
addresses at all."
As always, what is the
process of appealing or
getting a hearing on the
now 274 day ban amid
this questions, or
process to reapply which
was denied summarily on
2 January 2019? How is
this not
censorship?) and
the translated 22 minute
documentary about
Patrick Ho and CEFC's
bribes through the UN
including Mr. Guterres'
refusal to answer Inner
City Press' question on
it on 5 December 2018,
and that Inner City
Press for allegedly not
complying with interview
"rules" has been
disqualified from
reporting within the
UN? Again,
the sentencing
memorandum includes
quotes from his e-mails
regarding aiming to
violate sanctions and
deal in arms not only to
Chad but also South
Sudan, Libya &
Qatar. What is the SG's
comment and action?
Again, why has no audit
even been begun of CEFC,
at least like the one
Mr. Guterres'
predecessor did of Ng
Lap Seng's Sun Kian Ip
Foundation? Why did Mr
Guterres omit payments
from Gulbenkian
Foundation, which sought
to sell its oil company
Partex to CEFC China
Energy, from his public
financial disclosure
covering 2016? Where are
the more recent public
financial disclosures -
has Mr. Guterres ended
that program? Why?
March
25-8: On the
SG's March 22
appearance on
96th Street,
please
immediately
provide the name
of the UN DSS
officer who
spoke to NYPD on
96th Street to
get them to
restraint in
advance Inner
City Press while
UN Photo and
others like AP
walked freely,
the basis for
this censorship
and any and all
records
regarding
it.
,
