UN, Secret Briefings on Lebanon and Sudan, Withheld Briefings on Congo and
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN
UNITED NATIONS, June
11 -- When and why does the UN speak off the record? This is the tale of six
briefings -- four that have happened and two that have not -- and of a practice
that is in lurching evolution on the shores of Turtle Bay, at UN Headquarters.
a background briefing was offered by "a senior UN official" about the
Special Tribunal for Lebanon
created by Security Council Resolution 1757. Speaking without his name, this
individual estimated that the Tribunal could cost some $30 million a year,
compared he said to $100 million a year for the UN tribunals for Rwanda and the
Former Yugoslavia. The individual said, "I've hired for some times, months ago,
one former officials of one of these tribunals to help us" set up the budget.
aspects of the tribunal, the individuals made comments on the record, because
"some of your colleagues abroad would like to know more about the tribunals."
individual was asked, why is this on background, why can you not be named? The
individual said the goal was to avoid "frustration" for reporters, with so many
different rationale was offered last week, when another, different senior UN
official spoke on condition of anonymity about the supposed agreement on
peacekeeping in Darfur with the African Union and Sudan's president al-Bashir.
This individual said it is better not to be named, until the negotiations are
truly finished. As an aside, this might be never -- from Monday's noon briefing
Inner City Press; Thereís something called
Sudanese Media Centre,
which has reported that Mr. Bashir has again said that this was an
attempt by Western countries to
re-colonize Sudan. Is this the
type of thing that he says to the Secretary-General? Is there any response from
No the Secretary-General was not aware of that. This is a media report and this
is not the tone of the conversations that the Secretary-General has had in the
past with Mr. Bashir.
and scrum, advisor not shown (see below)
the June 6 afternoon briefing, the individual said that specific comments could
be on-the-record if submitted for approval by email. Inner City Press submitted
just such an comment, entirely innocuous, but was told in return:
"Although the quote is fine and can be
attributed to [redacted], our concern is that if you use it together with quotes
attributable to 'a senior UN official,' everybody will know that it was
[redacted] who did the background briefing. I would ask you to please use the
quote in a way that doesn't compromise the identity of the briefer."
proviso was thrown out the window five days later, by a sophisticated senior UN
official who mixed on-the-record and not-for-attribution quotes. In
near-ludicrous obeisance to the UN's inconsistent and often unexplained demands
for secrecy, Inner City Press is not using any of Monday's briefer's
on-the-record quotes. It is, however, time for the UN Secretariat to get it
together with regard to its briefers who are produced only if they are not
for reform remains on display in the never-amended anonymous accusation of a
senior UN official to dozens of UN correspondents, repeatedly stating that a
white plane used by the Sudanese government in Darfur, with "UN" on its wing, came from Kazakhstan. Later, Inner City Press'
research, still not contested by the UN, matched the number on the plane's wing
with a Russian airline, and after deliberation,
Inner City Press did not name the UN
briefer, but stated his nationality,
Russian. It's also worth noting that, at the end pf a previous briefing about
the Congo, when a wire service reporter said she would not write about the
briefing or the issue unless the briefer's name could be used, this briefer
said, "Fine, use my name." Can you say, arbitrary?
City Press was later approached by an individual in the UN Department of Public
Information -- apparently no one in the UN is supposed to be named -- and had
what seemed to be a clarifying conversation. Among other things, Inner City
Press advised that particularly in light of the UN's position that as an
inter-governmental body they must defer to member states (during the 2007
meeting of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues,
canceling a human rights film about the Hmong at the request of Vietnam, click
here for that),
the UN should not be requesting anonymity in order to accuse, as it now appears
falsely, a member state. The conversation seemed productive, although the
issue was again raised last month when Inner City Press asked that the List of
Staff of the UN Secretariat be released. On June 11, Inner City Press was
pointedly reminded, "this is a background briefing."
Two briefings that, even anonymously, have yet to be granted are a
request, raised Monday, for an explanation of the Department of Peacekeeping
Operations' slow or mis-investing of Congolese allegations against a Pakistani
battalion for trading in gold and guns, and against a Bangladeshi battalion for
torture and retaliation. The investigation of the former has now taken two
years. Of the latter,
Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson was
Question: With regard to the Congo, can
we get someone from DPKO [Department of Peacekeeping Operations] to come and
brief us about these new allegations about Bangladeshi...
Spokesperson: This is not a new
investigation. It is not a new allegation. This is something going back to
2005, as you know. There have been a number of investigations around that
specific case already. I think the Secretary-General mentioned today that an
investigation had been launched by SRSG [Special Representative of the
Secretary-General William Lacy] Swing, who last week asked the OIOS [Office of
Internal Oversight Services] to conduct a full investigation into all detainees
held by MONUCís [United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo] Ituri Brigade in 2005. So, this is not a new investigation into a
specific case, it [is] a continuing investigation.
Question: So, then a 'renewed'
investigation. Can we have someone come and tell us about the developments and
whatís being done to stop future incidents and so on and so forth?
Spokesperson: Well, as you know,
subsequent information was provided to DPKO by Ms. Arbour last week and that
will be provided to OIOS as part of the ongoing investigation. I'll try to find
someone who could come and brief you on this once the investigation is
problem is, if the past is any guide, the investigation might not be finished
for two years.
for now, the most-needed briefing, which should be on the record but has not
even been offered on background, is by the Deputy chief of staff. The nominal
chief of staff was witnessed leaving UN headquarters alone at 8 p.m. on Monday.
He has appeared, on the record, in the briefing room on February 9. From the
Deputy chief of staff, whom the
called the real Secretary-General, why no briefing? Developing.
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
(and weekends): 718-716-3540 Matthew.Lee [at]
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
(and weekends): 718-716-3540