Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER
 More: InnerCityPro

MRL on Patreon

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



At UN, Inner City Press Asks Amb Nebenzia About Egypt's Proposal on Sanctions, Here

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, August 1 – When new Russian Ambassador to the UN Vassily Nebenzia emerged from his first Security Council Program of Work meeting on August 1, Inner City Press asked him about the incoming President of the Council's proposals on sanctions, and he answered. Inner City Press: Egypt had a proposal about sanctions to have a working group to look at the impact of sanctions. What does Russia think of the proposal?

Amb
Nebenzia: We are discussing the resolution on that which is still in the Council. It has not been agreed upon yet. We have ideas about sanctions. You know that we are victims of illegitimate sanctions. Of course, any sanctions that the Security Council adopts – this is the limit of it. The Security Council is the only legitimate international body at all to come up with sanctions. We do not want to see extra sanctions on top of those adopted by the Security Council.

   Inner City Press streamed Periscope of the interchange, and the Russian Mission included it in its transcript, unlike most recently the UK which censored Inner City Press' questions - and Ambassador Rycroft's answer -- on Cyprus, here. We'll have more on this. There are other hypocrisies: back on February 26 [unmasker] Samantha Power used the death of Vitaly Churkin to (try to) show what an open minded person she is. It came a month after she and her portrait - it has still not been replaced - left the US Mission to the UN, and six weeks after she said the indictments of Ban Ki-moon's brother and nephew for using the UN to sell real estate "have nothing to do with the UN." (Power also scoffed at the UN bringing cholera to Haiti.)

   Power wrote that she was saddened -- that she was criticized for crocodile tears, calling Churkin a "deeply caring man" after having demanded publicly if he wasn't even "a little bit creeped out" by the type of killing of children she said nothing about in Yemen. (Her hypocrisy on Yemen continues, as now she is unmasked as the unmasker.)

  Power quoted what Susan Rice told her, fine; she recounted a Churkin e-mail, apparently to show how she worked him. She told stories apparently to show "deep caring," not by Churkin but by herself, taking Ambassadors to Shakespeare in the Park and Churkin to her parents house in Yonkers. Oh the humanity!

  There are those in the UN who liked Samantha Power for what they think she stood for. By the same token, Power and the Obama administration were unrelentingly defenders of the UN for what they said it stood for. But were either right?

  On January 13 Samantha Power took up the UN Press Briefing Room for more than an hour to extol her and Obama's virtues. Her outgoing spokesman called early on two US Voice of America affiliates.

 Between questions, Inner City Press asked, What about the indictment of Ban Ki-moon's brother and nephew? Tweeted video here.

  Power looked over and said, “I don't have any comment. It's not something that involves the UN.”

  Well, no. The indictment by the US Attorney's Office says Ban's nephew repeatedly cited his family's access to the Amir of Qatar to help selling a building in Vietnam. Ban knew of this for at least a year and a half. Any UN OIOS investigation? But Samantha Power was never about reforming the UN.

   Inner City Press asked, What about Haiti cholera? Power smirked / shrugged, and her spokesman moved on. So the UN bringing cholera to Haiti and killing 10,000 people, not paying a penny - that "is not something that involves the UN?" We'll have more on this.

   When the UN killed 10,000 plus people in Haiti by bringing cholera, what did the Obama administration do? The issue wasn't even mentioned in Power's 8000 plus word Exit Memo. Nor was Burundi or Yemen, where US-made cluster bombs have been dropped on schools and hospitals. A problem from hell, indeed.

   Power and her Deputy Permanent Representative for Management and Reform Isobel Coleman have said nothing about the indictment for bribery of Ban Ki-moon's brother and nephew for using the UN, nor about the John Ashe / Ng Lap Seng UN bribery case that has resulted in six guilty verdicts. We'll have more on this.

***

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Past (and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
 Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2017 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for