Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



 Law Firm Which Sued Wrong Defendant For Website Under ADA Is Reminded of Rule 11

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 8 – The Hackensack, New Jersey based law firm of Stein Saks, PLLC sued Waittcorp Investments, LLC about the lack of accessibility to blind people of a website, bobbyjones.c3style.com. 

  But Waittcorp showed them that it no longer invested in, or had any connection to, the firm Waitt Brands, which sold its interest in the website three years ago. Then Waittcorp asked for a conference, prior to mediation. 

 On September 9, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Gregory H. Woods held a proceeding. Inner City Press covered it. 

  Judge Woods asked the plaintiff's lawyer how he wished to proceed.

The answer was to amend the complaint adding an additional party, then after that to move to drop Waittcorp.  

Judge Woods reminded that Rule 11 applies, to naming Waittcorp again in an amended complaint.

The plaintiff's lawyer asked for him but Judge Woods reminded that it was a simple issue, raised by letter into the docket a week before.

  The plaintiff's lawyer began to say that he saw that Judge Woods did not favor - then got cut off. Judge Woods emphasized he was not telling the lawyer how to proceed, only reminding him that Rule 11 applied. 

 The lawyer said he will file to dismiss the complaint later in the case.

The case is Williams v. Waittcorp Investments, LLC, 20-cv-4395 (Woods).

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com