| Man Suing Leg Apparel For
Questions About Boyfriend Filed Press Now
Flashdrive Restoration
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Oct 21–
Aftern Sanderson was working
for Leg Apparel when their Ms.
Romanino repeatedly asked him
about his "boyfriend." He
sued.
On
September 10 U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
Gregory H. Woods held a
proceeding.
Leg Apparel hired
a law firm / government
relations professionals firm,
which in in a pre-motion
letter noted that Sanderson
complained about being
compared to Nicki Minaj
without stating "the nature of
the comparison."
The firm says
that quotes about Don Lemon
prove nothing.
On July 2,
another conference was held by
Judge Woods, and Inner City
Press again covered it. Is
Daytona Apparel Group a
successor to Leg? The
plaintiffs say yes.
On October 21,
2021, Judge Woods held another
proceeding, and Inner City
Press again covered it. The
defendant wants to move for
summary judgment, which Judge
Woods explained to the
plaintiff who insisted he was
discriminated against.
On May 16, 2022
Judge Woods held another
conference. Sanderson said the
defendant have been in bogus
unsworn affidavits; his brief
is now due on May 27. He put
into the record Inner City
Press' July 2, 2021 article.
Judge Woods said things
submitted this in way (can?)
become judicial documents.
On June 16, 2022,
Judge Woods held another
conference in the case, and
Inner City Press again covered
it. At issue was electronic
discovery provided some time
ago, which plaintiff later
found to be infected by a
virus. Judge Woods said there
was a lack of diligence but
asked defendants to see if
they could re-provide the
data. A range of motions of
denied. Questions remain for
the finder(s) of fact.
On August 29,
2022 there was another
conference. An issue was the
medical provider Shanyq Salop
was said to no longer want to
participate. At first it seems
previous testimony might be
proffered, then the plaintiff
said if she doesn't want to
participate, this too will be
let go.
On October 20,
Judge Woods held another
conference and ruled that the
parties are to supplement
their discovery responses by
November 3, and defendants are
to file a letter describing
the process for restoring the
data on the flash drive
previously provided to
plaintiff, by October 27.
The case will go
forward. It is Sanderson v.
Leg Apparel LLC et al.,
19-cv-8423 (Woods)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
