Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book
Belt and Roadkill
(and paperback)

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Rahul Siddharth of Verificient Is Sued By Staffer For Urging Abortion Lawyer No Show Again

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell Book
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 22 – Rahul Siddharth of Verificient Technologies has been sued by an ex-employee who says he got her pregnant and implored her to abort her pregnancy.      

   On February 25, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York  Judge Andrew L. Carter held a proceeding. Inner City Press covered it. 

 The plaintiff says she reluctantly aborted her pregnancy and that Rahul Siddharth never paid her the promised $45,000.    There was talk of JAMS mediation.

Judge Carter said to hold off, then, on motions. He asked for a joint status report on mediation by May 20.

On April 1, the parties reappeared before the assigned Magistrate Judge, Stuart D. Aaron. A request for more interrogatories, and to strike or seal, was denied.

Over the weekend of July 16-17, this: "ORDER with respect to [40] Letter Motion to Compel: Plaintiffs' motion made on Saturday, 7/16/2022, to compel a defendant to appear for deposition on Wednesday, 7/20/2022, in circumstances where that defendant's counsel was non-responsive on Friday, 7/15/2022, is DENIED. In that regard, the Court notes that Plaintiffs' counsel failed to provide the Court with a copy of the deposition notice, or the date that it was served. No later than Wednesday, 7/20/2022, Defendants' counsel shall respond to that portion of Plaintiffs' motion that seeks sanctions against him and his client. The Court shall hold a telephone conference on Friday, 7/22/2022."

On July 21, plaintiff's counsel filed a letter with Judge Aaron recounting that Siddharth failed to appear for a July 15 deposition and that his lawyer's "phone appears to be disconnected."

On July 22, Judge Aaron held the proceeding and Inner City Press covered it. But the defense lawyer did not appear. Judge Aaron set another - final? - conference for August 25 at 11 am, with the lawyer to show cause why he should not be sanctions, and with Siddharth ordered to appear himself. Is default coming?

The case is Doe v. Siddharth et al., 21-cv-4285 (Carter / Aaron).

***

@SDNYLIVE courthouse #CourtCastCast
                              200 Worth Street
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com