Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Viahart Said Its Brain Flakes Are As Famous As Nike Per Amazon Reviews Now Case Is Over

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, March 17 – Viahart based in Wills Point, Texas believes that its "Brain Flakes" brand is as well known as Coca-Cola and Nike. So it is suing.  

  On February 22 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Gregory H. Woods held a proceeding. Inner City Press covered it.

   Judge Woods asked Viahart's lawyer for the basis of claiming this fame of Brain Flakes.

The response cited Amazon reviews, even Pinterest posts.

Update of February 24: to enlarge the record, and to be responsive as so many aren't, we noted also "Brain Flakes' articles in the Wall Street Journal and New York Times."

Judge Woods advised addressing it in upcoming briefs. He declined to stay discovery.

On December 2, Judge Woods held another proceeding in the case and Inner City Press again covered it. Now the talk was of an amended complaint.

On March 17, 2022, this: "STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Playlearn USA, Inc. and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Viahart, LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Susser, Steven)."

The case is, or was, Viahart, LLC v. Creative Kids Online, LLC et al., 20-cv-9943 (Woods)

sdny

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com