Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Avenatti Sought To Exclude Evidence Of CLE Courses From Nike Trial US Reiterates Relevance

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Song Thread
BBC - Decrypt - LightRead - Honduras - Source

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Feb 4 –  When after three days of jury selection the trial of Michael Avenatti for allegedly extorting Nike began on January 29, Assistant US Attorney Robert Sobelman told the selected jurors that Avenatti was supposed to look out for the interests of his client, but he did not - he had a weapon, social media.  More on 1st day on Patreon here.

  Near midnight on February 2-3, Avenatti's lawyer Scott Srebnick filed a letter with Judge Paul G. Gardephe opposing the US Attorney's attempt to introduce evidence about Avenatti's "twenty year old Bar exam" and compliance with Continuing Legal Education rules, noting that these have changed over time and that California's differ from other states'.

  At the end of the February 3 trial day, Judge Gardephe asked if the US would be replying; he asked that they do so overnight. And they have, stating in part that "In his letter, the defendant does not engage with the Court’s previous rulings or comments, or explain why he waited until now to object to all such evidence, in any form. Nor does the defendant explain how, accepting that ethical duties are relevant—as this Court has ruled—his knowledge of the same is not. Instead, the defendant claims that any evidence offered on this point is wholly “irrelevant” unless it pertains expressly both to the current California Rules."  More on Patreon here.

  The trail resumes at 9:30 am on February 4. Judge Gardephe is expected to rule on this, on objections and perhaps on other issues on February 4 and Inner City Press will live-tweet as much as it can. Watch this site.

  In cross examination on January 31, Avenatti's lawyer Howard Srebnick asked Scott Wilson who was a lawyer representing Nike with Boies Schiller in March 2019 about documents showing Nike's Carlton DeBose arranging for Gary Franklin to fly to Phoenix, where he paid basketball prospect Deandre Ayton's mother $10,000 in case.

 Wilson claimed that he hadn't realized the flight Nike paid for was to Phoenix, Ayton's home, because its acronym PHX is so similar to that of Nike's headquarters in Portland, PDX. To some it seemed evasive, as did Wilson's repeated claim that as Nike's lawyer he could not provide information.

  Also cited were payments to player Brandon McCoy's "handler" Shaun Manning, and Avenatti's settlement offer to then jury verdict against Kimberly-Clark (the latter, AUSA Podolsky objected to, and Judge Gardephe sustained it).

    Podolsky also objected, and Judge Gardephe also sustained the objection, when Howard Srebnick asked Wilson about being "wired up." Wilson explained his dangling of money in front of Geragos and Avenatti as an attempt not to "spook Avenatti," so he could be cajoled to make demands while being recorded. It didn't take much.  Day III live tweeted thread here.

   At day's end Judge Gardephe set a letter briefing schedule on which we'll have more, and see Patreon here; he also answered Howard Srebnick that as a Green Bay Packer fan, he has to root for the Chiefs in Sunday's Super Bowl, given what happened (to Green Bay) in San Francisco. So, on the evening of February 2 and perhaps into February 3, he must be happy. Watch this site.

  Again why were the Adidas official and coaches prosecuted and jailed, and nothing from the US Attorney on Ayton, McCoy and Bol Bol? Watch this site.

There's been discussion of subpoenas from the SEC, but as captioned "In Re Athletic Apparel" companies. Inner City Press live-tweeted the proceedings, here, and will have more. More on Patreon here. The case is US v. Avenatti, 19-cr-373 (Gardephe).

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for