Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the United Nations to Wall Street to the Inner City

Associate Spokesperson Haq: Well, first of all, these are recommendations, proposals, that have gone to the Security Council. So, the important thing is to see how the members of the Security Council will react. And, of course, we await a response from the Security Council to this. This is his recommendations in terms of how we are to abide by the various timelines that the Security Council have given for us to do this work. But, I would just refer you to the letter itself, which says, “given the complex nature of phase three,” which is — for those of you who have been following this, the phase stretching from 1 November of this year until the end of June 2014 — “given the complex nature of phase three, additional analysis and consultation is required, involving the OPCW, the United Nations and Member States which may be in a position to contribute to the associated activities in order to develop a viable operational concept and conduct the necessary planning”. So, that would need to be the first step, is essentially dialogue amongst those parties.

Inner City Press: just a follow-up because it has this phrase about it being highly probable that Member States would be asked to provide security, I understand the Security Council has to approve it, but I wanted to know, is this a proposal that this security would be through a mission under DPKO or that they would authorize other forces to go into Syria, that’s the question.

Associate Spokesperson Haq: Well, I don’t think we can get ahead of ourselves here. First, of course, like we said, the Security Council needs to consider this letter, and respond as appropriate. Beyond that, as I just said, there would need to be a dialogue involving the United Nations, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and key Member States. And we will have to see what the results of those… that dialogue would be.

Inner City Press: I am sorry to be still on this letter, but where it says that there will be a special coordinator that the Secretary-General would appoint in consultation with the Director-General of OPCW, is this a name that would then be put through the Security Council kind of like an SRSG [Special Representative of the Secretary-General] is, advise and consent, or is it entirely up to the two, heads of the Organizations? And because I am trying to understand this idea that everything is up to the Security Council, on the trust fund, he says “I also intend to establish a trust fund”. So, does that mean also, with the approval of the Security Council, or is that something he can do himself?

Associate Spokesperson Haq: Well, the first foremost point is we are awaiting what the Security Council’s response to this letter will be. It is the Security Council, mind you, who requested this letter within a ten-day deadline. We have met that deadline, we have presented these proposals, and we will have to see what the reaction will be.

Inner City Press: it’s just to understand what part of what he is proposing is something that he is saying, this is what I want to do, please approve it. And which part of it is he just saying this is what I intend to do and I am going to do, which is different.

Associate Spokesperson Haq: The letter as whole is a response to their request for a concept of operations for a series of proposals. He has now presented them the proposals and it is for them to review. Yes, Pam?

We'll have more on this Trust Fund. Watch this site.