Kyrgyz Interim Leader Worked for UN, No Comment from UN, Pending Kubis
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, April 8 -- With the world temporarily focused on or at
least looking at Kyrgyzstan, much of the focus has been on new
"interim" leader Rosa Otunbayeva. One salient fact,
however, has been missed: Rosa Otunbayeva has worked for the UN, in
Georgia, from 2002 to 2004.
went back and found a
quote from Rosa Otunbaeva:
deputy head Roza Otunbayeva said she hoped that both sides would
still make an attempt to give concessions in order to advance the
talks, and she pledged continued support from the United Nations. "The
U.N. will do everything possible to create conditions
conducive to trust and constructive work," she said (Kuchuberia,
Inner City Press asked UN Associate Spokesman Farhan Haq
new [interim] leader of Kyrgyzstan is a former senior UN official,
having served as the Deputy and Acting SRSG in UNOMIG during the
previous SG's tenure. Does the Secretary-General believe that the new
leader is someone he can work with, given her UN credentials?
Kyrgyzstan, as the SG announced, Jan Kubis will travel there tomorrow
as his special envoy. We will await his travel and meetings as we
evaluate the situation in the country; we wouldn't have any comment
on the leadership there at present."
the Kyrgyz question, can the UN confirm that the current 'interim'
leader of Kyrgyzstan is a former Acting UNSRSG? And has the current
SG or his staff had any communications with her prior or subsequent
to the fall of the Baliev Government yesterday?"
that close observers say that Ms. Otunbayeva was chosen as interim
leader due to her "international connections."
Otunbayeva with then UNSG Annan, Ban Ki-moon's Kyrgyz visit not shown
But the UN's
I wouldn't comment on the leadership in Kyrgyzstan while Jan Kubis
prepares his visit. I can confirm that Rosa Otunbayeva had been
Deputy SRSG for UNOMIG from 2002 to 2004. "
can possible next UN Secretary General Jan Kubis perform in
Kyrgyzstan? Watch this site.
* * *
On Sudan, Moonlighting UN Staffer as
Darfur "Rebel" Leader, As
JEM Is Pressed to Support Elections on April 11
Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive
NATIONS, March 28 -- With elections in Sudan approaching as threats
and irregularities multiply, a United Nations employee in Addis
Al-Tijani Al-Sissi suddenly emerged
as the head of newly formed rebel
Liberation and Justice Movement. Beyond the politics, one wonders
a person can be a paid UN employee and at the same time by a
pro-government "rebel" leader?
Al-Sissi being out of The Sudan for 20 years, and being a full time
staffer of the UN's Economic Commission for Africa, he was brought to
the fore as purported replacement for Abdel Wahid Al-Nur, leader of
the legacy rebel Sudan Liberation Movement, whose Fur tribe has thus
been unrepresented as Al-Nur refuses to participate in the Darfur
talks much less elections.
Fur willing to talk with al-Bashir was needed, and a UN staffer was
found. But to be a leader, he must have put time into the rebel
movement, while being a UN staffer. Why was this accepted?
City Press is informed that Al-Sissi's supervisor at the UN Economic
Commission for Africa, Abdalla Hamdok, complained about the
moonlighting or double service of Al-Sissi, but that nothing was
does not look good, one long suffering Darfuri told Inner City Press
on Friday. The UN has some explaining to do: watch this site.
Al-Tijani Al-Sissi, moonlighting from UN
ECA job not shown but accepted
with Sudanese opposition parties nearing a decision next week on
whether to boycott the April 11 election if Omar al-Bashir's National
Congress Party does not agree to postpone it, Inner City Press is
told by Arab Group ambassadors at the UN that pressure is being
brought to bear on Khalil Ibrahim of the Justice and Equality
Movement rebels to have JEM come out favor of April 11 polling.
Ibrahim has been summoned to Doha," Inner City Press was told by
an attendee of the March 26 meeting of the Arab Group, at the
Ambassadorial level, held in the UN's new building by New York's East
the UN on Friday, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky to explain Ban's quote in Al Hayat
against any postponement of the election, video here,
City Press: There is an interview that the Secretary-General gave
with Al Hayat about… there are portions about President Bashir --
that he would not meet with him unless “absolutely necessary”. But
particularly it seemed to be quoting him as saying that he is not
in favour of any postponement of the Sudanese election. Something
the opposition parties there requested and the Carter Center has said
that -- and I believe that the UN in a background briefing has said
-- that 11 April would be would very difficult to accomplish. So,
what does he mean by no postponement? He believes it absolutely
should be held on 11 April?
Nesirky: Read out the exact quote.
City Press: Okay: “I understand that elections could be postponed
for a short period of time, but why should be made to postpone the
month of November? I am not sure it can properly [be] arranged at
that time.” So I am asking, I guess there are some words missing
Spokesperson: Yes, there are some words
missing. I read that, too, and there are
some words missing in that transcript. What I think is clear is, as
we have said before and has been said from here, there are fairly
considerable technical challenges to delivering that election for the
Government that is in the driving seat on this, and for those who are
providing technical assistance. It is a considerable undertaking. What
I think he is suggesting there is that, if there is a delay, it
does not mean that it will be any easier should there be a delay to
deliver at a later date. I think that is all he is saying.
some see a connection, which the UN has yet to address, to the UN
housing or hosting a pro-government rebel leader to support talks
with Al-Bashir, while also ignoring Sudanese opposition parties' call
for a postponement in light of abuse. Watch this site.
on the above quote by Ban Ki-moon, which came from the Sudan
Tribune's pick-up of Al Hayat's interview, a junior Al Hayat
correspondent ran into the UN press briefing room to say that her
newspaper's version of the transcript did not have any words missing.
While Inner City Press then explained where it got the quote from,
strangely neither statement was included in the UN's
although both can be seen in the video,
* * *