|
UN Silent on LRA,
Short Lists and Sanctions, Bans Iran from Transcripts But Answers on
Congo
Byline: Matthew
Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
April 26 -- The week of UN briefings began with more dodging of
questions about
Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Erasures
from BAN's transcripts were defended,
and the Spokesperson's justifications of exclusions
of the press were
themselves excised from Tuesday's transcript, replaced by a bracketed
assurance
of access which, while false, remains online. The previous process
of releasing
short-lists of finalists for top UN positions is being discontinued
under BAN,
with the regional diplomacy center in Turkmenistan only the most recent
example. The buck was passed the Council on a British judicial
trouncing of the
UN's Taliban sanctions, but the Council at least provided answers. A
Secretariat
official, asked about waste and how money is spent, said
"talk to my secretary." On this, we will have more. The week ended
with answers about fighting in the Congo, a welcome change of pace
which we
hope will be continued.
On April 22, Inner
City Press asked about reports that
"in recent weeks 350 people have been taken hostage by the
Lord’s
Resistance Army. They are the ones who are saying that the LRA did it
and they
call on the surrounding countries and the UN to take all actions to get
the
people released and to enforce the warrants. What does the UN know
about this?
Is in fact the LRA doing it, and what is the UN doing? What is the
response to
this call and to this kidnapping?"
Spokesperson Montas: Well, there is no -- any response will
have to come
from the Security Council. Any decision to put armies together to
attack a camp
-- those people would presumably be detained -- would be a decision to
be taken
by the Security Council.
Inner City Press: I guess in terms of UN fact-finding, I know
that in
the past the UN had tried to say, well we don't know if it's the LRA,
we don’t
know who is doing this kidnapping. Has there been any progress in
finding out
actually who is behind this?
Spokesperson: No. We cannot confirm that. No.
Inner City Press: Is there any update on the peace talks?
Spokesperson: No, we don’t have anything yet on that,
but I am sure you read
the latest development.
Yes,
that the peace
talks came to an end. But what about the abductions, seemingly for a
new round
of fighting?
As
the UN opens a
diplomacy office in Central Asia, it appears that there will be no
public or
transparent process to name the new director.

In Abidjan, BAN prepares to answer, while
questions dodged in NY
On Thursday Inner
City Press asked
There is a report that a Slovak diplomat, Miroslav Jenca, is
going to
head the Center for Preventive Diplomacy in Turkmenistan.
Can you confirm that?
Deputy Spokesperson Okabe: No, I
can’t confirm an appointment. I saw the
reports just like you did. But the
Department of Political Affairs (DPA) did announce late last year that
the
office had been set up.
Inner City Press: And in that process, was the procedure sort
of a
short-list?
Deputy Spokesperson: We
have
nothing to announce on this. All I can
say is that we have an office there.
While the
Security
Council enacts sanctions, the Secretariat is involved in reporting on
and
implementing them. But there was no Secretariat answer when Inner City
Press
asked:
There has been a ruling
by a court in the United Kingdom that the Al-Qaida
and Taliban sanctions can't be or won't be enforced in the United
Kingdom,
because they don’t allow due process to the people charged under
them... What
does the UN say about these sanctions that can't actually be
implemented?
Deputy Spokesperson: You
should
probably talk to the members of the Sanctions Committee.
All 15 members of this Sanctions Committee
met this morning precisely on the subject of the sanctions against
Al-Qaida and
the Taliban.
Inner City Press spoke
with Council diplomats, who said there have been problems enforcing the
sanctions in, among other, Italy, South Africa and the UK, as well as
smaller
countries and those with less money, who see the sanctions as a form of
unfunded mandate.
One
of the Council's
set of sanctions is directed at Iran. Which makes the UN's erasure from
the
transcript of BAN's last stake out of what he said about Iran all the
more
troubling. On Monday, Inner
City Press asked
I noticed last week when there was a stakeout by the
Secretary-General,
he made a statement about Iran, and when I read the transcript, it
wasn't in
the transcript. There was a whole paragraph where he said that he
welcomed
cooperation by Iranian authorities with the IAEA.
Spokesperson: It was simply that the question was about Iraq
and he
answered on Iran so on the transcript, we put his answer on Iraq.
Inner City Press: Okay, I guess I am saying, the thing on
Iran stands.
That is his position on Iran.
Spokesperson: Yes.
Inner City Press: I guess I am wondering, has there been a
thought on
whether the transcript should be changed in that way?
Spokesperson Montas: No, because he was not asked that
question. The
transcript is supposed to reflect really the questions asked and the
answers
that occur at a stakeout or a briefing.
Come again? The
week ended with a question
actually answered:
Inner City Press: You may have read out something about the
fighting in eastern Congo.
Deputy Spokesperson: Yes I did.
Inner City Press: Is there any indication whether General
Nkunda's forces are involved? Who are
the forces that are fighting?
Deputy
Spokesperson: Today I would like to
refer you to the UNHCR briefing note. It
has quite a lot of detail on the fighting there. Beyond
that, I don't have anything else.
But in fact, the
Spokesperson's office did have more information, from the UN Mission in
the
Congo, MONUC:
Regarding your question on yesterday's fighting in North
Kivu, UN
Mission sources report that yesterday's firefight resulted when
Congolese
Patriotic Resistance (PARECO) elements exchanged fire with National
Congress
for the Defense of the People (CNDP) supporters (the latter are General
Nkunda's forces). The MONUC patrol returned fire that was received from
PARECO
combatants. UN Mission sources report that, according to most recent
information obtained, MONUC personnel were mistakenly engaged by
participants
in yesterday’s firefight at Mushango.
Today, there have been no additional clashes recently
reported involving
suspected Congolese Patriotic Resistance (PARECO) combatants and
National
Congress for the Defense of the People (CNDP) elements in North Kivu.
Thanks.
Now that
is answering a question, a welcome
change of pace which we hope will be continued.
* * *
These reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|