UNITED NATIONS
GATE, June
28
– Inner City Press
on July 5 was banned
from entering the
UN, the day after it
filed a criminal
complaint against UN
Security for
physically removing
it from covering the
meeting about the UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
$6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and
essentially cheered
on by senior UN
official Christian
Saunders, tearing
its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally
twisting his arm and
slamming shut and
damaging his laptop.
On August 17,
Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale issued a
letter banning Inner
City Press from the
UN - for life. With
no due process. She
and Guterres have
put the UN in the US
Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN
would answer Press
questions to the
Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric and his
Office;
Dujarric said
the same on
camera.
On June 28
three
hours before the
UN noon
briefing in
which Stephane
Dujarric
dodges a
question about
peacekeeping by
referring to
the UN Budget
Committee
which Inner
City Press was
roughed up and
then banned for
covering,
Inner
City Press submitted 986
questions,
including why
it continues
to be
lawlessly banned
from entering
to ask
questions in
person:
"There
are more than
500+
questions
UNanswered.
And Monday
Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept
18, Wed Sept
19 and
Thurs and Fri
Sept 21, that
whole week, no
questions
answered. Nor
Sept 25, nor
28th - nor
October 2 nor
3. While
appreciating
and using what
was belatedly
sent on
May 20
about sexual
exploitation
allegations
and on March
28 in partial
request to
Inner City
Press'
questions
about the UN
bribery
sentence of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC and
CEFC's 2018
attempt to buy
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid the
SG, no answers
on Dec 17 or
18 or 19 or 20
or 21 -
another FIVE
days in a row,
even as SG's
direct
conflicts of
interest and
failure to
disclose
emerge, and a
newest low. No
answers on
January 30 nor
31 nor
February 1 nor
4 nor 5 nor 6
nor 7 nor 11
nor 12 nor 13
nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19
nor 20 nor 21
nor 22 nor 25
nor 26 nor 27
nor March 1 -
27 (!) And now April 1, 3-30 (one
answer
in the
entire month -
corrupt), and
now May
1-13, 15-17,
21-31,
June
3-27,
many
questions.
No answers at
all during
those four
days of the US
v Ho trial
showing
corruption in
the UN says it
all. This ban
is just
censorship -
and Inner City
Press must be
allowed back
into the noon
briefing to
ask its
questions in
person and
follow up on
them.
June
28-1: On the
G20, China and
the SG's
craven
inaction,
please
immediately
state if Mr
Guterres
raised the
crackdown in
Xinjiang or
Hong Kong to
Xi and confirm
or deny this
Chinese
government
read out of
Xi's meeting
with Guterres:
"Guterres
appreciated
China’s
long-term
support to the
UN and spoke
highly of
China’s
important
contribution
to a political
settlement of
the Korean
Peninsula
issue, dealing
with climate
change and
sustainable
development.
China’s
proposal of
Belt and Road
Initiative is
essential to
global
development,
especially to
Africa’s
development,
Guterres
said."
June
28-2: On China
and the threat
of war, what
is the SG's
comment and
action if any
on that Two
Chinese
fighter jets
buzzed a
Canadian
warship and a
supply vessel
operating in
international
waters in the
East China Sea
earlier this
week, the
Department of
National
Defence has
confirmed.
On Monday
afternoon,
local time, a
pair of Su-30
warplanes
rocketed
within 300
metres of the
frigate HMCS
Regina and MV
Asterix,
flying about
30 metres
above the
ocean
surface.
June
28-3: As to
the UNAT
session from
which you have
banned Inner
City Press
from attending
and covering,
please
immediately
plausible
explanation of
how it is
humanly
possible that
when the UNAT
is required to
consider an
appeal filed
by the
Administration
against a
judgement
wherein a UNDT
judge found in
favor of the
staff member;
the UNAT
judges find
that the UNDT
made serious
errors of fact
or law in 93%
of all cases.
On the other
hand, when
these same
UNDT judges
find for the
Administration
and the staff
member chooses
to appeal, the
UNAT finds
they made
serious errors
of fact or law
in only about
2% of cases.
These figures
are
unbelievable
but
official.
See Figure VI
on page 15 of
the OAJ Annual
Report
(A/73/217)
dated 23 July
2018 ...
June
28-4: On
Cameroon,
after the SG's
receipt of
Biya's golden
statue (where
is it?) and UN
Budget
Committee
favors, what
is his comment
and action if
any on Biya's
FM Mbela today
at the UN in
Geneva calling
secessionists
terrorists, as
his government
kills
civilians in
the SW and
NW?
June
28-5: On press
freedom and
Nigeria, what
is the comment
and action if
any of the SG,
and separately
DSG Amina J.
Mohammed, to
that the
Department of
State Security
Services (DSS)
declared a
crackdown on
social media
users for
posting
materials
described as
threatening to
the country’s
peace and
stability.
The NBC,
citing its
powers under
the National
Broadcast
Commission
Act,
sanctioned the
stations for
airing
“inflammatory,
divisive,
inciting
broadcasts,
and media
propaganda
against the
government.”
AIT was cited
for
broadcasting
“uncensored
and unedited
social media
content.” The
DSS
subsequently
arrested an
unknown number
of unnamed
social media
users for
allegedly
threatening
peace and
security by
posting
inciting
statements...
In the UN,
what has the
accountability
been for Lt
Ronald E.
Dobbins and
those those
refused on
camera to give
their names?
What is each
of yours -
particularly
the SG's -
response to
the letter
written and
sent by
Burundi
activist
Manisha
Lievin? To the
April 15
letter to the
SG, DSG and
USG Smale for
which receipt
has not even
been
acknowledged,
other than a
single lawless
line from
MALU: "Your
media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M66561081, has
been
declined"?
This is a
formal request
for the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denied,
and since
SGcentral, the
SG's chief of
staff and
Deputy SG and
USG Smale
haven't even
confirmed
receipt of the
April 15
letter much
less
responded, for
reconsideration.
AGAIN,
immediately
explain how it
is legitimate
to ban from
enter into the
UN the media
that has been
asking about
these and
other
questions,
with no
hearing or
appeal.
June
18-2: On the
SG and China,
what is his
response to
Dolkun Isa,
president of
the World
Uyghur
Congress, who
called the
Xinjiang visit
by Voronkov
“an
irrevocable
mistake on the
part of
General
Secretary
Guterres.”
“It is truly
shameful for
the UN
June
14-5: Since
the SG claimed
publicly that
the mansion he
lives in
"cannot" be
sold, please
immediately
provide any
and all
documents with
such a
restriction,
and separately
explain why
the concept of
cy pres or
reformation of
donor intent
has not been
explored.
Separately,
Boutros
Boutros Galli
wrote in his
book that the
building was
given by
Arthur
Houghton
through the
United Nations
Association of
the USA. What
actual
inquires, with
UNA-USA or any
successor to
Houghton or
Corning Glass,
has Guterres
made?
June
11-1: On
Cameroon, what
is the SG's
comment and
action if any
on this report
from Chinese
state media:
"YAOUNDE, June
10 (Xinhua) --
Cameroon's
House Speaker
of National
Assembly
Cavaye Yeguie
Djibril on
Monday
denounced
foreign
interference
in the
country's
internal
affairs which
he referred to
as
"conspiracy."
"Cameroon has
become an
object of
conspiracy
intended to
destabilize
the country.
To justify
their
interference
in internal
affairs, the
conspirators
pretend to
denounce it."
Again, how
many offices /
desk does the
Secretariat
give to
Chinese state
media inside
the UN?
June
4-3: On UN
sexual abuse
and
exploitation,
AGAIN as
requested on
the morning of
June 3
immediately
disclose what
IS the new
"allegation of
SEA" which the
UN on the
morning of
June 3
announced by
e-mail.
Clicking
through to the
UN website,
the previously
announced case
against South
Africa
peacekeeper is
no longer at
the top of the
page, and it
is unclear
what the new
allegation is.
This lack of
clarity is
unacceptable.
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? What
is the even
plausible
applicability
of this line
from SG
Guterres' web
page: "Please
note that
given the
multi-cultural
environment of
the UN and the
often security
sensitive
locations
where UN staff
are either
working or
come from,
full public
disclosure may
not always be
a viable or
sensible
option for
certain staff
members"? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.
,
