As SG Guterres Covers Up UN Rapes Banning Press That Asks Code Blue Calls Him A Failure #No2dTerm

Inner City Press

In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron. 

MRL on Patreon

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis


(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka


FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"




Bank Beat

Freedom of Information

How to Contact Us

As SG Guterres Covers Up UN Rapes Banning Press That Asks Code Blue Calls Him A Failure #No2dTerm

By Matthew Russell Lee, Video here, Vine here

UNITED NATIONS GATE, March 18 -- UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres says he has a "zero tolerance" policy for sexual abuse, exploitation and harassment, and for retaliation. But on March 15 he took his administration's "press briefing" about UN sexual abuse off the record, in a room he has banned Inner City Press which most asks about it from for 257 days. Disgusted UN interlocutors had already leaked the report that was the subject of this shamefully collusive briefing to Inner City Press which nevertheless voluntarily decided to abide by the printed 18 March 10 am embargo. Still Guterres, Amina J. Mohammed, Alison Smale and "spokesman" Stephane Dujarric refused to answer written Press questions, then Dujarric bragged about the report to a noon briefing of hand picked scribes not one of whom asked him about the rapes. Now this from Code Blue: "When the United Nations is under siege from so many quarters, the abject failure to curtail sexual offenses within its own ranks is a gift to its foes. The release today of Secretary-General António Guterres’ annual progress report on “Special Measures for protection from sexual exploitation and abuse: implementing a zero-tolerance policy,” delivered that gift.  Days after his appointment in 2017, Mr. Guterres declared his signature priority: the disgrace faced by the UN year after year would finally end because he would restore real meaning to the hackneyed phrase “zero tolerance for sexual exploitation and abuse by United Nations personnel.” Under his leadership, victims would take center stage, transparency would supplant secrecy, Member States would rally, whistleblowers would become heroes, and “game-changing solutions” would be kicked into gear. This was a new Secretary-General who would finally quell the myth that soldiers under contract as peacekeepers are the only UN personnel who attack the people they’re meant to assist. The long-time UN official would admit that a crisis of depravity and impunity had its grip on the whole sprawling UN system.   It was time, the new Secretary-General said, for a “New Approach.” To carry it out, he appointed women to high-level positions: Special Coordinator Jane Holl Lute would bring order to chaos; Jane Connors, his Victims’ Rights Advocate, would champion the injured. He called for a High-Level Meeting to rouse world leaders; committees and boards, task forces and networks, experts, advisors, and focal points to dismantle the crisis; new protocols to ensure uniform standards; vetting to block undesirables; training to enlighten; hotlines to report; more and better investigators to point perpetrators toward justice; more and better data to record every failure and track every trend.   Expectations ran high two years ago; last year, they began to dip. But with today’s Special Measures Report on the progress and achievements of 2018, hope bottomed out.  Using data as unreliable as it is perplexing, the Report dispassionately states that 205 people who were told they could rely on UN personnel for protection or assistance in 2018 —overwhelmingly women and children, overwhelmingly from the most deprived and dangerous places on earth—were raped, molested, degraded, sexually exploited, and abused instead. Another 121 fell victim to the staff of UN implementing partners enlisted by the organization to conduct its business.   “Allegations” (a misleading UN term coined to clump many incidents and perpetrators into smaller groupings) were made against 41 police and soldiers contracted from UN Member States’ defense forces as peacekeepers; 107 were reported against the UN’s civilian personnel. Although there are fewer civilian than uniformed UN personnel (90,000 vs. 100,000), 72.3% of the “allegations” were made against members of the UN’s civilian staff and related personnel.   By the UN’s own reckoning, those numbers—as with all previous years’ data—are a fraction of the reality: literally countless victims don’t feel that they can report, and some parts of the UN don’t feel any need to report. In paragraphs scattered throughout, the Special Measures Report reveals Ms. Holl Lute’s failure to bring coherence or even compliance to the UN system’s response to sexual exploitation and abuse across its many entities. Promises of rules and regulations for system-wide application are unfulfilled or languishing at the “pilot” stage. Nevertheless, last year Mr. Guterres split his Special Coordinator’s attention between his top-priority issue and a new role, as his Special Envoy to Cyprus. He avowed that, “The Special Coordinator will prioritize achieving timeliness, accuracy and consistency in reporting across all levels of the Organization in 2019.”  The Secretary-General’s non-performance is accentuated by the serious deficiencies evident throughout the Report. This random sampling selected by the Code Blue Campaign, as of the morning of the Report’s release, is far from exhaustive, but indicative:  A single “allegation” against police actually involved 12 perpetrators and six victims.  Information about the final outcomes of allegations is negligible. Ten of 148 allegations against UN personnel were closed and one staff member was fired for exploitation, but final actions taken on the remaining 137 are each labeled “pending.” Of 109 allegations against UN implementing partners, 15 were closed or unsubstantiated, 81 are ongoing, and 13 are simply listed in a final column as “substantiated or under review.” No explanation is offered.  Two different UN civilian personnel who were accused in Mali of rape were fired after internal UN administrative investigations substantiated the rape claims made by their victims (one a minor). Neither man is named, and referrals to national authorities for bona fide criminal investigations and court proceedings are “pending.” Public, beware. Not one man accused of crimes is recorded as having been prosecuted or convicted.   In parts of the UN where reporting has increased, the Secretary-General “suggests” without evidence that this indicates greater trust in the system, thanks to staff training and awareness-raising campaigns that “led, inter alia” to more victims coming forward. But where decreases in levels of reporting appear, that means that prevention programs are working.  Wherever the data points, the Report’s rhetoric can spin it as an achievement.  Far from game-changing, the Secretary-General’s new approaches to engaging Member States—a “Circle of Leadership” and a “Voluntary Compact”—are evaluated only by the numbers of signatories. In place of examples of the signatories’ leadership or exceptional commitment, the frequency of meetings is noted.  When their military or police are accused, Troop-Contributing Countries are obliged to inform the UN of the results of the investigations conducted and the accountability measures taken. In 2018, reports on 106 allegations dating back as far as 2010 were outstanding, but no Member State was barred from peacekeeping last year for violating its contract year after year. Some non-compliant governments may have signed the zero-obligation Voluntary Compact. It’s impossible to tell, since serial UN shirkers—like serial sex offenders who are fired from their UN jobs and returned, unpunished, to the general population—are never named.  The rights of victims of UN sexual abuse have yet to be codified, but the Report asserts that victims have been helped to know and exercise their rights. Constant repetition of a well-worn catch phrase is offered in lieu of any explanation of what a “victim-centered approach” entails, or how a Victims’ Rights Advocate advances it. Ms. Connors and four field-based victims’ rights advocates—officials sworn to defend the best interests of the UN—meet with victims who’ve accused the UN of grievous crimes, offering them gifts, legal services, and “counseling.” The UN seems unconcerned about that inherent conflict of interest.  Ms. Connors reportedly meets with victims one-on-one “where possible,” though not in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, one of her four focus countries; for the second year in a row, she has not managed to visit the DRC.  A Victims’ Trust Fund, years in development, reportedly assisted 306 beneficiaries in three countries last year. How many of the recipients of those funds were victims of sexual exploitation or abuse—by UN personnel or by anyone at all—isn’t reported. The services rendered, however, do not seem targeted to the special needs of such persons.   With no supporting evidence, the Secretary-General declares in his Report that he is “driving a cultural transformation across our complex system.” At the same time, he places convenient emphasis on his lack of authority over most of the UN’s disparate entities. If he cannot persuade the entire UN system to accede to his moral authority on this issue, he cannot lay claim to a cultural transformation.  The few points above only hint at a litany of inadequacies laid bare by the Special Measures Report. It is profoundly disheartening to imagine the time, money, and intellectual acumen wasted on producing several thousand words of no real consequence. The Code Blue Campaign remains, as ever, willing and able to offer what the UN truly deserves and desperately needs: concrete, informed proposals to solve what is now an existential UN crisis of its own making." #DumpGuterres: no second term. Here's from Guterres' report: "54 allegations reported in 2018... the majority (74 per cent) of the allegations received in 2018 emanated from MINUSCA and MONUSCO, with the remaining 26 per cent associated with the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali, MINUSTAH, the United Nations Mission in Liberia and UNMISS... The allegations reported for peacekeeping missions were associated with 94 victims, of whom 83 per cent were adults and 17 per cent were children. Alleged perpetrators included 64 military, 14 police and 14 civilian personnel. Of the allegations reported in 2018, 20 (37 per cent) involved sexual abuse and 34 (63 per cent) sexual exploitation of an adult. 71. Underreporting of allegations implicating personnel from other United Nations entities and non-United Nations personnel working with implementing partners is a continuing concern (see A/71/818). In 2018, 94 allegations against United Nations personnel in entities other than peacekeeping were reported. Reports of allegations related to personnel of implementing partners has increased, from 25 in 2017 to 109 in 2018, suggesting that awareness-raising and outreach efforts are having an impact and that there is increased trust among victims and witnesses and increased understanding of the need to report." So when the numbers go up, it's good news too. Inner City Press has asked, "March 18-1: On the SEA report which was not sent to Inner City Press by the UN but by others, and which Inner City Press voluntarily refrained from reporting on until the 10 am deadline, please before 10 am explain (a) six allegations were considered conduct in violation of non-fraternization policies and not to contain indications of sexual exploitation or abuse - question: did these cases not involve sex? (b) four allegations involved sexual harassment, physical assault and paternity claims, which were considered not to contain indications of sexual exploitation and abuse - question: isn't fathering a child with a beneficiary of UN "assistance" per se exploitation? (c) three allegations involved sexual assaults between United Nations personnel, but not with beneficiaries of assistance - question: confirm this was "blue on blue," on which the UN has previously refused to answer Inner City Press; (d) one allegation involved a member of United Nations personnel not associated with a peacekeeping mission; one allegation did not involve sexual exploitation and abuse - question - what are the bases of these statement?; and one allegation was received by OIOS in 2018 but will be recorded in 2019, once it is referred to the Member State concerned - question: what is the member state concerned and what have they done, as of 18 March 2019?" The report states, "The Special Coordinator will prioritize achieving timeliness, accuracy and consistency in reporting across all levels of the Organization in 2019." That is false - Guterres and his spokesman Stephane Dujarric refuse to answer basic requests by Inner City Press for if-asked information they have about UN rapes but choose to cover up. Then there ar the agencies: "In 2018, there was an increase in the rate of reporting of sexual exploitation and abuse at WFP, with its investigations office receiving significantly more reports in 2018 (11 involving WFP personnel and 8 related to its implementing partners) than it had in the previous 12 years (19 in 2018 alone; 26 over the previous 12 years). It is difficult to determine the extent to which the increase is attributable to an increase in incidents or whether outreach efforts have encouraged reporting by staff. There was an increase in the number of allegations reported at UNHCR during the fourth quarter of 2017, which stabilized in 2018. Thirty-four allegations involving UNHCR personnel were received in 2018, compared with 19 in 2017. During the same period, allegations concerning UNHCR implementing partners increased, from 20 to 83. I attribute those figures in part to the UNHCR strengthened global network of 380 focal points on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse and efforts to raise awareness and encourage victims to report. UNICEF scaled up training for staff and partners, updated its programme cooperation agreement template to strengthen reporting and broadened prevention and response measures. In 2018, there was an increase in the number of reports of allegations at UNICEF (15 in 2018, compared with 8 in 2017). Of those 15 allegations, 12 involved implementing partners, compared with 4 in 2017." Great partners. A fish rots from the head.


Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at]

Past (and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] for