Inner City Press

Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the United Nations to Wall Street to the Inner City

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Google
  Search innercitypress.com Search WWW (censored?)

In Other Media-eg AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

,



Follow us on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

RSS

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



As France Bombs Mali, UNclear If Ban "Confirmed in Advance" SC Satisfaction

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, January 13 -- As France expands its air strike on Mali from Konna to Gao, claiming it is all within the "framework of international law," questions remain unanswered.

   The law at issue is Security Council Resolution 2085, drafted by France and adopted as modified on December 20, 2011. In Operative Paragraph 11, which a country involved in the negotiation described to Inner City Press as the "Algerian element," various safeguards and steps are required:

"11. Emphasizes that the military planning will need to be further refined before the commencement of the offensive operation and requests that the Secretary-General, in close coordination with Mali, ECOWAS, the African Union, the neighbouring countries of Mali, other countries in the region and all other interested bilateral partners and international organizations, continue to support the planning and the preparations for the deployment of AFISMA, regularly inform the Council of the progress of the process, and requests that the Secretary-General also confirm in advance the Council's satisfaction with the planned military offensive operation."

  Focusing on the last clause, that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon should "confirm in advance the Council's satisfaction with the planned military offensive operation," Inner City Press on January 12 asked Ban's top three spokespeople to "Please state, both as of the beginning of France's military operation and as of your response, what the Secretary General did to 'confirm in advance the Council's satisfaction with the planned military offensive operation,' specifying both what the Secretary General knew about the plans and operation, and what he knew of the Council's position on those plans and operation(s). Also, less pressingly, what did Mr. Prodi do while in Bamako?"

  So far, there has been no answer; whatever is provided will be published. But there are questions of how Ban Ki-moon even COULD have confirmed in advance the Council's satisfaction with France's military offensive.

  On January 10 at the Security Council, where France proposed and procured a non-binding press statement calling for a speed up of the deployment of the African-led AFISMA mission, France did not meaningfully present its plans for a military offensive. So how could Ban "confirm in advance the Council's satisfaction"? Watch this site.

Share |

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City Press at UN

Click for  BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Office: S-253, UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
  Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-2012 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com