Inner City Press

In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis


(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka


FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"




Bank Beat

Freedom of Information

How to Contact Us

After Ernest Murphy Got 260 Months Maurice Curtis Pled To Lies Now Brady Request Denied

By Matthew Russell Lee, @SDNYLIVE

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Nov 19 -- A jury returned guilty verdicts on drugs and gun charges on August 20, 2019 against Ernest Murphy, one of 15 defendants in a Brooklyn-based narcotics conspiracy case brought by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Now a co-defendants sentencing is asked to be delayed two months due to Coronavirus and the Bureau of Prisons' response, see below.

   It came after some electronic and laboratory evidence was suppressed by Circuit Judge Richard J. Sullivan, who rather than re-assigning has kept many of his criminal cases in the SDNY.

  On November 16, something new: a co-defendant who had cooperator came in to plead guilty to an after arising charge for which the US Attorney would not give a 5K letter. Maurice Curtis was charged withing falsely telling an Eastern District of New York judge that he had two asthma attacks in April 2020 in the GEO cooperators' lock-up in Queens.

  Judge Sullivan asked him if he had lied. Yes, he said, but I did have troubling breathing.

 Judge Sullivan asked, Didn't you do exercise to feign an asthma attack? Yes, was the answer. Tough crowd. The sentencing was adjourned "sine die," pending further cooperation apparently. But, Inner City Press asked in its November 16 report, wouldn't this be raised in cross examination to any testimony?

And that has in fact now been previews, with a request for Brady material denied. Attorneys for Tyshawn Burgess wrote to Judge Sullivan seeking an order for "video surveillance from GEO of Mr. Curtis in April 2020, pertaining to the charges and of him attempting to induce asthmatic symptoms, and medical records. I respectfully submit that, all of this material, which corroborates Mr. Curtis’ criminal dishonesty and casts doubt on his credibility, falls within Brady. As the Court and government are aware, several defendants will be sentenced after the Court conducts the Fatico hearing. Maurice Curtis will be the star witness at that hearing and will provide testimony on highly contested sentencing issues that will not only affect the defendants at that hearing, but also those sentenced after the hearing. The Brady disclosure obligation does not end because the defendants have pled guilty, as the Brady disclosure rule applies to impeachment material that relates to evidence presented at sentencing."

Judge Sullivan denied it: "Defendant's request is DENIED. As indicated in its prior order (Doc. No. 747), the Court is confident that the government is aware of its production obligations and will comply with them without a reminder from the Court. SO ORDERED."

 On September 8 Judge Sullivan was to sentence co-defendant Devontae Newton, using the CourtCall platform. Inner City Press called in. But first there was a lot of echoing on the line. It was recommended that Judge Sullivan mute himself, and raise his hand to be given the floor. He gamely endeavored, but finally the screen froze up and he said the sentencing would be postponed, probably to next week. He apologized to Newton. Strangely, Judge Swain's simultaneous (re-) sentencing on CourtCall worked fine. Inner City Press later learned there is a difference in capabilities in the computers of District Judges and Circuit Judges.

 On September 25, the Newton sentencing resumed and was consummated. Newton spoke movingly, and Judge Sullivan agreed that he had been young at the time of the crime. Judge Sullivan recounted a termination of supervised release proceeding earlier in the week, how well that defendant had been doing. Inner City Press covered that as well, but has yet to report on it because at the end, Judge Sullivan said the transcript would be sealed because of discussion of cooperation and where the cooperator now works.

  In this case, Judge Sullivan said he hoped Newton would in the future similarly return for a termination of (five years) of supervised release. Judge Sullivan said in Fort Dix, he can take college classes even in Princeton, "which I couldn't get into," he said.

  He sentenced Newton to 72 months - above the 60 month mandatory minimum, but below the 87 month guideline. Judge Sullivan pointed out he could have faced 15 years if the US Attorney's Office had not dropped the gun charge. He wished Newton well.

  Earlier in September 2020, this was sent to Judge Sullivan: "Re: USA v. Burgess et al., (Tyshawn Burgess) 18 Cr. 373(RJS) Dear Judge Sullivan: I am appointed counsel for Tyshawn Burgess, and Sam Coe is appointed co-counsel, pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (CJA). Currently, Mr. Burgess is scheduled for a Fatico hearing on October 15, 2020. As the Court is aware, this is a complex matter with voluminous discovery relevant to the upcoming hearing. My understanding is that Mr. Burgess is only permitted to view discovery for one hour at a time at the Westchester County Jail, which makes his participation in his own defense difficult as the hearing approaches. We are requesting that the Court direct the Westchester County Department of Correction to allow Mr. Burgess to review the discovery in his case for at least two-hour blocks of time, to the extent practicable, between now and the date of the hearing. Mr. Coe has contacted two of the assistant wardens of the jail regarding this issue, as directed by a jail supervisor, and has not yet received a response."

 On September 8, Judge Sullivan denied the request without prejudicing, urging that if it is renewed more detail be provided: "MEMO ENDORSED denying [715] LETTER MOTION Additional Time in the Library at the Jail as to Tyshawn Burgess (1) ENDORSEMENT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's motion is denied without prejudice to renewal. Should Defendant seek to renew his motion, IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED THAT he provide the Court with specifics about when and to whom his requests were made at the Westchester County Jail, and what response, if any, he has received as of the date of his renewed motion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/6/2020)." Watch this site.

  On March 3 Burgess came up for sentencing and Inner City Press which alone covered the trial went to cover it. But the sentencing was postponed for this Fatico hearing. Before he adjourned it, Judge Sullivan told Burgess in his orange WCDOC shirt that others in the case, he says given serious time: Bayer 108 months, Felix 160 months, Robinson 126 months, Murphy himself 260 months (see below), Wilson 180 months.

 But now there will be a Fatico hearing, and Inner City Press hopes to be there. Judge Sullivan is right that transparency is important, and it is appreciated. Here's the Minute Entry: "proceedings held before Judge Richard J. Sullivan: Status conference/Sentencing held on 3/3/2020. Defendant, in custody, present with attorneys Lorraine Gauli-Rufo and Samuel Coe. AUSA Karin Portlock present with Brittany Raffa (ATF) and James Miles (NYPD Det.) Court reporter present. The Court adjourned the sentencing and ordered the parties to appear for a Fatico hearing. The Court ordered the government to submit a letter no later than Wednesday, March 10, 2020, advising the Court of counsel's availability for such hearing, the government's expected witnesses and exhibits, and whether any of Defendant's co-defendants require the Court to resolve similar disputes. The Court will set a date for the Fatico hearing by separate order. " Watch this site.

 Back on February 13, 2020, Judge Sullivan sentenced Ernest Murphy. In the gallery of his mobile courtroom now 11B were six Murphy supporters, and independent Inner City Press. Judge Sullivan was rigorous, demanding that Assistant US Attorney Matthew Hellman justify his count of weight of heroin and of crack.

  In a two hour proceeding, Sullivan sentenced Ernest Murphy to 260 in prison: 200 months on Count 1 (lower than the government requested), and 60 more months to run consecutive on Count 2. Judge Sullivan urged Murphy to get R-DAP drug rehab and job training and warned his "iPad and laptop" may be searched -- all this in more than 20 years when he gets out. What will be the technology then? Inner City Press will stay on this.

  Murphy's two Criminal Justice Act lawyers, Patrick Joyce and Robert Moore, present again on February 13, had complained to Judge Sullivan on the eve of trial that they had only then been given 16 gigabytes of audio and video recordings and lab tests on crack cocaine.

  Rather than delay the trial, Judge Sullivan ordered much of it suppressed. During the five day trial the government still had a number of NYPD lab technicians testimony, and played wiretaps of cell phone calls and calls from Riker's Island, whose location in The Bronx was cited as a basis for venue in the SDNY.

  In the intercepted calls, there was discussion of cooking, packaging and selling crack cocaine. Several times reference was made to bringing firearms to protect turf. A government slang expert witness said that "Shaquille" jersey meant .32 caliber pistol.

  After the jury got the case, they asked to examine the drugs. Judge Sullivan declined to send the crack and ecstacy pills into the jury room. Instead the juror came out and passed them hand to hand, in evidence bags, in the jury box.

 On the second day of deliberations the jury through the Court Security Officer passed a note that they wanted all audio recordings and transcripts. Judge Sullivan sent them in a thumb drive and three binders, as well as a menu to order lunch.

  But barely an hour later, the jury returned with its guilty verdicts. The case is US v. Ernest Murphy, 18-cr-373 (Sullivan).


Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at]

Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] for