In Extortion
of Fire Victims Case Smith Pro Se Despite
US Gets Bench Trial, Nov 20 Removal
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
book
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Nov 17 – The lead
defendant in a criminal case
alleging gang extortion in the
field of clean-up services to
properties damaged by fire
asserted his Speedy Trial Act
rights.
On
September 9, 2022, U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge Jed S. Rakoff held an
in-person arraignment and
detention or bond proceeding,
with the defendant's family
and supporters filling half of
the courtroom gallery. Inner
City Press was there.
On the
request to move up the
scheduled May 2023 trial to
October, Judge Rakoff said he
will speak with Judge Analisa
Torres about changing the
schedule of her US v. Tim Shea
(We Build the Wall) trial.
We'll see.
On
detention or release, the
Assistant US Attorney recited
from audio recordings of
threatens, saying "N-word, I'm
gonna kill you."
The defense
lawyer, retained from Staten
Island, pointed to those in
the gallery and called the
threats hyperbole. Judge
Rakoff said the defendant
clearly had supporters, but
was a danger to the community.
He was ordered
detained.
Afterward by the
elevators, supporters said of
the prosecutors after they
left in a separate elevator,
"They lie."
Jump cut to March
27, 2023, when Judge Rakoff
convened a Curcio hearing on
the lead defendant. In short
order he ruled, there is no
conflict, and adjourned the
proceeding. Ten days prior,
Judge Rakoff had denied this
request to suppress the
forensic copy of his phone,
taken after he was denied
entry into Jamaica and was
found with $10,000 upon his
return.
Back on September
13, Judge Rakoff held a
proceeding with co-defendants.
The lead defendant Jatiek
Smith applied to move his
trial from October 17 to
November 28 was granted, and
three co-defendants were
allowed to join him for trial
beginning that date, one with
a new lawyer. The others
remain for trial on "5-1-22,"
which we take to mean May 1,
2023.
On April 27,
Jatiek Smith appeared before
Judge Rakoff, seeking to go
pro se. His CJA lawyer, it was
said on the record, collapsed
in the subway; Inner City
Press is voluntarily not
report further medical
details.
Jatiek
Smith said he is tired of
waiting for lawyers; he said,
"You view me as an animal, so
I'll just do it myself."
Judge Rakoff
pointed out that the first CJA
counsel's sickness was not his
fault.
Then
Jatiek Smith asked for the
courtroom to be cleared to
speak about his experience
with his lawyers. Inner City
Press did not contest the
sealing; it stood by the
elevators with six AUSAs and,
separately, supporters of
Smith. When summoned back in,
it was put on the record that
Smith will communicate by 5 pm
on May 1 if he wants to go pro
se - in which case trial would
start May 8 or 15 -- or
continue with another CJA
lawyer, or two, on August 14,
moved up in the sealed session
from September 19.
It emerged that
3500 material and other
discovery cannot be shared
with Smith on the same
timeline as other defendants,
which would impact his ability
- and Constitutional right -
to represent himself. It was
unclear how or if this was
addressed in the sealed
session.
Thing became
clearer on May 1, when the
trial date (and
representation) were set:
"ORDER as to (22-Cr-352-1)
Jatiek Smith. On 4/27/23, the
Court held an in-person
conference with Jatiek Smith,
his then-primary counsel
Thomas Nooter and co-counsel
Jill Shellow, and prospective
counsel Andrew Patel, as well
as counsel for the Government.
See 4/27/23 Hr'g Tr. As
discussed further on the
record during that proceeding,
severe and unexpected medical
setbacks that had very
recently arisen affecting Mr.
Nooter's health meant that Mr.
Nooter was no longer able to
try this case... following an
on-the-record (but sealed)
colloquy regarding the risks
of going prose, Mr. Smith
asked for some time to further
consider the issue. He has
since written the Court (in a
letter that has been docketed
separately, see dkt. 211)
stating his preference to
remain represented by Ms.
Shellow (as primary counsel)
and Mr. Patel (as co-counsel)
and proceed with an August 14
trial date."
On July 11, the
US Attorney's Office asked for
at least 60 months for Hasim
Smith.
On July 19, Inner
City Press went to the
proceeding for Jatiek Smith to
fire his lawyers and go pro
se. Judge Rakoff ordered
everyone out of the courtroom
except outgoing counsel and
two associates in the
courtroom gallery.
After more than
half an hour, the press and
public were allowed back in.
Judge Rakoff said he had had a
cordial talk with Smith and
that he would be appointing
now counsel, to meet with
Smith by July 24. A week after
that, Smith is to write in
whether he wanted to keep
these new counsel and see his
trial pushed back, or go
forward pro se with the trial
starting August 16.
Docketed on July
27 was Jatiek Smith's letter
from the MDC, that he will
take CJA counsel and see his
trial delayed.
On July 28 his
brother Hasim Smith was up for
sentencing, and got 30 months.
Inner City Press was there, thread:
Inner City
Press noticed the late -
today - defense sentencing
submission
Defense lawyer
says he was late because his
client is being "sentenced for
things he didn't do."
Judge Rakoff
thunders, You brought this on
yourself.
Hasim Smith says
Parole recommended he go to
work in his brother's company,
"chasing fires at night... I
did not assault anyone."
Judge Rakoff:
This defendant is articulate,
even eloquent. I sentence him
to 30 months.
On August
16, 2023 a pre-trial
conference for Jatiek Smith
was on the schedule for 11:30
am. Inner City Press went but
found the courtroom door
locked. A woman by the
elevators with a young child
also asked why it was locked.
Hours
later into the docket went a
letter from the prosecutors:
"this morning, due to reports
of the defendant's
noncompliance with the U.S.
Marshals at the courthouse,
the Court adjourned the
conference until September 6,
2023."
On September 25
Judge Rakoff docketed this
laptop access order - to be
contrasted with that, for
example, Sam Bankman-Fried's
lawyer continue to demand:
"ORDER as to Jatiek Smith. The
trial of Jatiek Smith was
previously scheduled to start
on August 14, 2023. By Order
dated May 1, 2023, the Court
found that numerous
security-necessitated
lockdowns in the MDC were
preventing Mr. Smith from
having access to a computer to
meaningfully review his
discovery and adequately
prepare for trial, and the
Court accordingly directed
that Mr. Smith be provided
access to a computer
notwithstanding the lockdowns.
See Dkt.214. The trial of Mr.
Smith has since been
rescheduled and will now
commence on November 27, 2023.
Accordingly, the Court's May
1, 2023, electronic access
order (Dkt. 214) is hereby
vacated and the following
Order substituted. It is
hereby ordered, on consent of
the parties, that, regardless
of lockdowns in the facility,
MDC shall permit Mr. Smith to
have access to a computer to
prepare for trial for no fewer
than seven hours per day every
day starting on November 6,
2023 and continuing until
November 27, 2023, and after
the trial begins to have
access to a computer for no
fewer three hours per day on
days when Mr. Smith's presence
is required at the courthouse
and no fewer than seven hours
per day on days when Mr.
Smith's presence at the
courthouse is not required.
(Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff
on 9/25/2023)." Watch this
site.
Then one of
Jatiek Smith's co-defendants
was sentenced, with a medical
facility recommended: "as to
Kaheen Small (4), Count(s) 1,
Dismissed; Pleaded guilty to
Count(s) 2, Imprisonment for a
total term of Twenty Four (24)
Months. Supervised release for
a term of Two Years. The court
makes the following
recommendations to the Bureau
of Prisons: Incarceration in a
Chronic Care 3 Facility such
as FCI Butner Low, Butner,
North Carolina or FMC Devens
Low, Ayer, Massachusetts. The
defendant shall surrender for
service of sentence at the
institution designated by the
Bureau of Prisons before 2pm
on 11/28/2023. Special
Assessment of $100 which is
due immediately. (Signed by
Judge Jed S. Rakoff on
9/26/2023)."
On October 10,
Judge Rakoff docketed: "ORDER
as to Jatiek Smith: The Court
has received two prose filings
from defendant Jatiek Smith,
dated September 28, 2023, and
October 6, 2023. Mr. Smith,
although offered the
opportunity to proceed prose,
has chosen to be represented
by appointed counsel, Jonathan
P. Buza. Accordingly, the
Court has warned Mr. Smith
that such prose filings are
not permitted and all
applications must be made
through his counsel. As a
courtesy to Mr. Smith, the
Court will forward copies of
his submissions to his counsel
so that Mr. Buza is apprised
of these improper filings.
(Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff
on 10/10/2023)." And he set a
pre trial conference for
October 23 at 11 am.
Inner City Press
went, and found the Assistant
US Attorney's waiting out in
the hall. Later, it went in as
Judge Rakoff authorized a
paralegal to act as Jatiek
Smith messenger, but not to
provide any legal advice. Then
"Defendant's motion to proceed
for trial pro se and have
standby CJA counsel appointed
granted after a Faretta
hearing proceeds. The trail
date remains 11/27/2023."
On November 3,
Judge Rakoff docketed that
Smith may be shackled for
trial, for anger management
issues - so a bench trial is
being briefed.
On November 15,
of the SDNY prosecutors'
objection, a bench trial was
ordered: "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
as to Jatiek Smith. The Court
remains mystified why the
Government has refused to
consent to a bench trial in
this case. It cannot be that
the Government has a policy of
never consenting to criminal
bench trials; indeed, this
judge has in recent years
conducted such trials with the
Government's consent,7 as have
his colleagues. The Court is
not yet forced to the
conclusion that the Government
simply wants to parade Mr.
Smith, with all his
troublesome tendencies, in
front of a jury, knowing it
will prejudice him and make
conviction more likely. But
even if this is not the case,
the Court finds the
Government's unexplained
insistence upon a jury trial
in this case both striking and
troubling. See generally
United States v. Allen, 644 F.
Supp. 2d 422, 431 (S.D.N.Y.
2009) (noting the "special
role" prosecutors have in our
system of justice "not solely
to advocate for the guilt of
the defendant" but also to
seek "truth and fairness"). In
any case, it is the Court's
duty to guarantee Mr. Smith a
fair trial, and thus, for the
forgoing reasons, the
defendant's request for a
bench trial is hereby granted,
the Government's objection is
overruled, the defendant's
latest request for an
adjournment is denied, and the
trial will go forward, as
scheduled, beginning on
November 27, 2023 as a bench
trial. (Signed by Judge Jed S.
Rakoff on 11/15/2023)."
Then on November
17, this order about November
20: "ORDER as to Jatiek Smith:
Upon the application of Damian
Williams, United States
Attorney, by Elizabeth A.
Espinosa, Assistant United
States Attorney, made to this
Court by affirmation dated
July 12, 2023, and pursuant to
the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. §
1651, it is hereby ORDERED
that: 1. The United States
Marshals Service for the
Southern District of New York
allow agents, who are members
of the Department of Homeland
Security, Homeland Security
Investigations (HSI) and the
Federal Bureau Investigation
(FBI), to remove JATIEK SMITH
(Bureau of Prisons Register
Number: 08188-510) from the
USMS cellblock at the federal
courthouse located at 500
Pearl Street, New York, New
York, and to return him to
that location on the same day
that he is removed, on
November 20, 2023. 2. The
agents from HSI and FBI shall
keep SMITH in their custody
and shall be responsible for
his safekeeping and welfare
during the periods in which
they have custody of him.
(Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff
on 11/17/2023)."
Watch this site.
The
overall case is US v. Smith,
et al., 22-cr-352 (Rakoff)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|