Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Sean Combs Argues 1st Amendment Trump Precedent in 3d Bid for Bail with Ruling Soon

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Nov 25 – At 4:30 pm on September 16 Inner City Press was told by its SDNY source to expect "the big one" - Sean Combs - the next day in the courtroom here.

At US Attorney Damian Williams' press conference Inner City Press asked if his office would be seeking detention - Yes, he said. Detention memo on Patreon here.

[Inner City Press published book / audio book Diddy Do It? on Sept 20 on Amazon here]

More on X for Subscribers here & Substack here

On November 18, Combs' lawyers filed for a hearing, arguing that "prosecutors are in possession of attorney client privileged material" - filing on Patreon here

After 5 pm on November 18, the US Attorney's Office replied that no hearing is necessary,  letter on Patreon here

On November 22, Inner City Press live tweeted the bail arguments, here. Judge Subramanian did not decide, instead asking for letter by Monday at noon

At noon on Monday Combs' lawyers filed, including that "Mr. Combs’ Communications Regarding Potential Public Statements And Social Media Posts Constitute Speech Protected By The First Amendment...  In United States v. Trump, the D.C. Circuit “assume[d] without deciding that the most demanding scrutiny applies to” pre-trial speech restrictions on criminal defendants" - full 8 page letter on Patreon here

Extra/analysis on X for Subscribers here & Substack here

The case is USA v. Combs, 1:24-cr-542 (Subramanian)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com