Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



James Dolan Fighting Off Oakley Lawsuit Can Continue to be Repped by NYC Official Mastro

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, April 14 – Following the ejection of former Knick Charles Oakley from Madison Square Garden by security guards who had just conferred by James Dolan, a lawsuit is still proceeding in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. 

Back on December 22, 2020 Judge Richard J. Sullivan held arguments. Inner City Press live tweeted them here

Jump cut to November 20, 2024 after remand from the Second Circuit, a hearing on the loss of Oakley's text message, thread

On April 14 Judge Sullivan denied Oakley's request to disqualify Randy Mastro now that he is Eric Adams' deputy mayor, stating "
, the alleged conflict at issue here does not fall into either of the two categories identified above. There is certainly no concern about the vigor of Mastro’s representation of MSG, and there is nothing to indicate that Mastro will now have access to privileged information about Oakley that could provide MSG with an unfair advantage. See Nyquist, 590 F.2d at 1246. Rather, Oakley relies on the conflicts of interest provisions of the New York City Charter. But he points to no case law where a court has disqualified counsel on these grounds, particularly in light of the availability of other potential disciplinary mechanisms. And even assuming that the Court had the authority to disqualify counsel based on a violation of the New York City Charter, Oakley has not established any factual basis from which the Court could conclude that disqualification was warranted here. As Mastro makes clear, the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (the “COIB”) has determined that there is no conflict of interest and that 'Mastro may continue to represent MSG, so long as he does not participate at the Mayor’s Office in any matter involving MSG.'"Full Order on Patreon here

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

The case is Oakley v. Dolan et al., 17-cv-6903 (Sullivan)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222 NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com