Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Bravo Is Sued For Real Housewives of NY Pressing McSweeney to Drink Cites Free Speech

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Aug 13 – Arguing that she was pressured into drinking alcohol while on the "Real Housewives of New York" show, Leah McSweeney has sued NBC, Bravo, Andy Cohen and others. The defendant argue that they are protected by the First Amendment. 

    On August 13, this was argued before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Lewis J. Liman, who mentioned a possible conflict of interest while calling the free speech / anti-SLAPP defense "interesting." Inner City Press was there. From the thread:

Judge Liman: How much of this is about the shows the Defendants put up?

McSweeney's lawyer: Discriminatory speech is not protected. So we do not think discovery should be stayed. Judge: What discovery are you going to need?

McSweeney's lawyer: On air and off air footage. Some of the conduct intended to retaliate against Ms. McSweeney was coordinated with others. So, third party discovery.

Bravo / Cohen lawyer Levin: This is implicates the First Amendment. It could chill free speech. There are anti-SLAPP laws  Judge: Doesn't part of this have to do with alcohol and drinking? Could a producer require an actor to drink alcohol?

Defense lawyer: That's not what happened here. But the First Amendment would protect the employer in that case from a lawsuit, for authenticity Judge: What about smoking marijuana, since that's criminal? [Federally]

Defense: Producers may require nudity, or something else they're uncomfortable with, under the First Amendment.  Judge: I have relatives in the movie business

More on X for Subscribers here & Substack here 

  The case is McSweeney v. Cohen, et al., 24-cv-1503 (Liman)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com