Inner City Press

In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis


(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka


FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"




Bank Beat

Freedom of Information

How to Contact Us

In Delayed 2001 Attacks Case Saudi Arabia Wanted Courtroom Closed Now Nov 24 Briefs

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Decrypt - LightRead - Honduras - Source

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Nov 5 – In ongoing lawsuit "In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001," originally filed in 2003, the COVID 19 pandemic of 2020 continues to cause a pause, one being used by the Saudi defendants, it emerged at a telephone conference with some 300 attendees on May 21, 2020. Inner City Press covered it, below.

 Jump cut forward to September 29, 2021 when
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn held a telephone conference with Dubai Islamic Bank and others, about experts. Inner City Press live tweeted it, here.

On Thursday October 28, before a Monday hearing, John Fawcett's right to now invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid questions about his leak of information from the case was taken up, and disposed of, by Judge Netburn. Inner City Press live tweeted here.  The rejection of Fawcett's Fifth Amendment claims by Magistrate Judge Netburn was upheld by District Judge George B. Daniels on October 29.

On Saturday October 30, two days before the hearing, Saudi Arabia proposed cutting off the audio line and closing the courtroom for some or all of Fawcett's testimony. Letter here. It is an outrage: "counsel for Saudi Arabia proposed that the  courtroom be closed for any testimony that reveals protected material, and counsel for Fawcett  proposed that, in order to avoid inadvertent disclosure of protected material, the courtroom be  closed and the audio feed be cut off for the entirety of Fawcett’s testimony, that counsel  promptly review the transcript and propose redactions, and that the transcript be made public as  soon as practicable after the hearing. Saudi Arabia takes no position on whether the courtroom  should be closed for the entirety of Fawcett’s testimony. If the courtroom is not closed for the  entirety of Fawcett’s testimony, we request that counsel and the witness be instructed not to  disclose Saudi Arabia’s or Al Jarrah’s protected information without giving us an opportunity to  object and to request that the courtroom be closed for that specific part of the testimony." Watch this site.


On October 29, District Judge George B. Daniels heard argument then upheld Magistrate Judge Netburn and rejected the invocation of the Fifth Amendment. Inner City Press live tweeted here:

OK - in the 9/11 case  @SDNYLIVE , now 2d proceeding in 2 day about 5th Amendment claim by Kreindler & Kreindler's John Fawcett for allegedly having leaked a copy of a deposition from the case against Saudi Arabia.

 Yesterday Magistrate Judge Netburn shot down Fawcett's use of Fifth Amendment at Monday's hearing, here. 

But they've gotten a quick re-hearing before District Judge George B. Daniels. He asks about the Klein test.

Fawcett's lawyer: Now that the Court is considering a criminal referral, there are new grounds for apprehension.

Judge Daniels: If there were no new grounds, would he have any basis to not testify? Fawcett's lawyer: Yes, the first - Judge: I read the transcript.

 Judge Daniels: Didn't he already understand that if he violated the court order and admitted to it, he might face criminal contempt?

Fawcett's lawyer: He's a non-lawyer. Judge Daniels: I'm supposed to assume that when he submitted the 2d affidavit he didn't know?

 Judge Daniels: It's like a Perry Mason moment - he breaks down and confesses, then says, Perry Mason can't ask me any more question while I'm on the stand.

 Judge Daniels says again and again Fawcett can't invoke the Fifth. Annoying beeping on the line.

Judge Daniels: I believe Magistrate Judge Netburn was right in denying the invocation of the Fifth Amendment by Mr. Fawcett

Inner City Press notes that in this case, Docket Item 6122, Motion for Conference dated April 14, 2020, says "You do not have permission to view this document."

Judge Netburn has ruled, in the interim: "ORDER: On November 1 and 2, 2021, this Court held an evidentiary hearing into the breach of the protective orders in this litigation. This order governs subsequent proceedings related to that hearing. By November 24, 2021, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the law firm of Kreindler & Kreindler, and John Fawcett shall file proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any remedies the parties believe are appropriate based on that hearing. Proposed findings of fact shall be supported with specific citations to the record. These filings shall be made under seal pursuant to this Order, with access restricted to the parties. By December 1, 2021, the remaining law firms of the Plaintiffs' Executive Committees shall file a letter with the Court stating if they believe any redactions to the parties' November 24 filings are necessary. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 11/4/2021)."

The case is In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 03-md-1570 (Daniels / Netburn).


Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at]
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] for