Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Follow on X

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 2, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - 

Support this work by buying this book
Belt and Roadkill
and paperback

 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Baldoni Lawsuit Dismissed With Narrow Leave to Amend against Blake Lively Parties in SDNY

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, June 9  – In the Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni lawsuits, a hearing was held on February 3 before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Lewis J. Liman. Inner City Press was there with live coverage, thread

On February 10, Lively's lawyer asked for delay: "Plaintiff Blake Lively respectfully moves for an extension of time to file her amended complaint to March 5, 2025.  Full filing on Patreon here

On February 11 Baldoni's lawyer consented to delay but noted "attacks on non-party Jed Wallace" - filing on Patreon here

On February 25 Baldoni disagreed on the proposed protective order, on Patreon here

On March 6, Judge Liman held a hearing on the protective order, which Inner City Press live tweeted here

On June 9, Judge Liman dismissed Baldoni's lawsuit with a narrow leave to amend: "the Court will grant leave to amend the claims for tortious interference with contract and breach of implied contract. The Wayfarer Parties fail to plead the specific details of any contract between Baldoni and WME, but suggest in their briefing that this defect is “easily curable” and that they will plead an oral or implied contract of which Reynolds was aware. Dkt. No. 160 at 23 & n.10. Given the allegations that Reynolds told WME to “drop” Baldoni, it cannot be said that repleading this claim on such terms would be futile. Similarly, the Wayfarer Parties assert that they are able to allege the details of Lively’s contract with Wayfarer, including that her right to consult and approve on the film be exercised in a reasonable manner. Dkt. No. 162 at 32. Without seeing the contract, the Court cannot say that the amending the breach of implied covenant claim will be futile."

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here, Buy Me a Coffee here

Back on February 6, a new book "Hollywood Hearsay," ranging from the CRD complaint in California o Jed Wallace's new case in Texas, comparing SDNY defamation cases, from Sarah Palin through Devin Nunes v Rachel Maddow. Book here, Audiobook here


***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com