Inner City Press

Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the United Nations to Wall Street to the Inner City

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .


Follow us on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis


(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka


FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"




Bank Beat

Freedom of Information

How to Contact Us

UN Bemoans S. Kordofan Lack of Access, Treats It Differently, Stonewall

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, July 16, updated -- Are there unexplained double standards at the UN on humanitarian access?

  On July 16 in “elements to the press,” the Security Council on the “humanitarian situation in Sudanese states of Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile... urged warring parties to allow humanitarian access in accordance with Resolution 2046” adopted by the Security Council, more than two years ago.

(Inner City Press has put the full "elements to the press" below.)

  Inner City Press asked UN Humanitarian chief Valerie Amos, and the Council's Rwandan presidency for July, if the newly adopted Syria model for humanitarian access would be applied to Southern Kordofan.

  Amos did not answer that part of the question -- perhaps because she said she was only answering on Sudan and South Sudan -- and the Rwandan presidency said that no member of the Council had suggested even circulating a resolution as was done on Syria.

  OCHA and many Security Council members have bemoaned the lack of access to Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile. But why have no steps been taken, as on Syria? Reports under Resolution 2046 are not, as those on Syria are, put out in advance in the UN Spokesperson's office.

And a request by the Free UN Coalition for Access to OCHA's head of communications, previously in the same position for UN Peacekeeping boss Herve Ladsous, for a copy of Amos' clearly prepared opening remarks at the stakeout on Sudan and South Sudan (or "if not, why not") was not responded to, whereas Amos' statements on Syria can be disseminated.

Update: an hour after FUNCA's request he replied, "The written statement will be delivered to media soon, once the text is aligned with what was delivered. This is standard practice. I'm not sure why the 'if not why not' question."

  It was more than four hours after that, and long after filing of this and other stories, that OCHA belatedly sent Amos' Sudan remarks - after OCHA had sent a number of other statements.

   In fact, OCHA has provided to the media near real-time summaries of information given in closed consultations to the Security Council on Syria, for example on the morning of May 29. Why the difference with Southern Kordofan?

  Inner City Press also asked Amos about a critique of Ladsous' UNMISS mission in South Sudan, as undermining humanitarian independence. Amos gave a thoughtful answer about the need for escorts and security, given the logistics challenges. But how will this be received at the upcoming humanitarian summit?

  After the Rwandan presidency read out the “elements to the press,” Inner City Press asked about the status of Rwanda's June 26 complaint that Ladsous' MONUSCO mission had flown the FDLR militia's leader from Eastern Congo to Kinshasa before any decision by the 1533 Sanctions committee on giving a travel ban waiver (it was denied).

  Ladsous' DPKO has not even responded to the complaint, was the answer. On July 15, UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq told Inner City Press that the FDLR leader was escorted back to Eastern Congo - but then insisted he hadn't said that the UN did the escorting. Who did, then? Watch this site.

Full text:

Press elements following the briefing on Sudan/South Sudan

The members of the Security Council expressed deep concern about the security and humanitarian situation in the Sudanese states of South Kordofan and Blue Nile. They urged the warring parties to cease hostilities, engage in direct dialogue without preconditions and allow unhindered access to humanitarian assistance, in accordance with SC Resolution 2046.

The members of the Security Council further expressed deep concern about the deterioration of the situation in South Sudan, including in its humanitarian dimension, which has put about one million people under threat of famine. They were alarmed by information that both parties were recruiting and acquiring weapons, in violation of their agreement of June 10, and stand ready to consider appropriate measures, in consultations with countries of the region, against those who will not implement their commitment to peace in South Sudan.


Share |

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City Press at UN

Click for re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Feedback: Editorial [at]

UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]