Inner City Press

Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the Inner City to Wall Street to the United Nations

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

  Search Search WWW (censored?)

In Other Media-eg Nigeria, Zim, Georgia, Nepal, Somalia, Azerbaijan, Gambia Click here to contact us     .


Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis


Follow us on TWITTER

Subscribe to RSS feed

Video (new)

Reuters AlertNet 8/17/07

Reuters AlertNet 7/14/07

Support this work by buying this book

Click os to Khmer courtn cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"




Bank Beat

Freedom of Information

How to Contact Us

As Sri Lanka Speaks of “Conditional Visas” for Ban's Panel, UN Switches to “Potential Visit," No Answer on to Whom Ban Spoke

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, January 4 -- Eighteen days after UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said his Panel on Accountability would go to Sri Lanka, his spokesman Martin Nesirky now openly called it a “potential visit,” and refused to answer Inner City Press' questions about who Ban spoke with before his December 17 announcement, and if even the Panel's staff would visit Colombo.

Each work day between Christmas and New Years, Nesirky refused to answer six questions Inner City Press asked each day. Nesirky insisted, as he did on January 4, that he has “no new guidance” from the Panel.

  Nesirky told Inner City Press that "between Christmas and New Years [we had] a number of exchanges... nothing has changed in the guidance I have for you." Video here, from Minute 6:32.

 That is, that Ban and his Panel refuse to provide Spokesman Nesirky with information as basic as who in the Sri Lankan government they spoke with.

  With public reports now speaking of “conditional visas” and the Panel being limited to “making representations” to the Lessons Learnt & Reconciliation Panel set up by President Mahinda Rajapaksa, whose brother directed military operations during the bloody events in 2009, Nesirky claimed that “we were fairly clear on where things were, and they remain there.” What?

UN's Ban and his Panel: no guidance on switch from Dec. 17 statement

   Ban's acting Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq has twice told Inner City Press that Ban's Panel's work goes beyond speaking with the LLRC. But then, without answering any of Inner ity Press' pending questions, he told BBC's Sinhalese service that perhaps Ban's panel, contrary to what Ban said on December 17, will NOT go to Sri Lanka.

   Did Ban Ki-moon actually have an agreement from the Rajapaksa administration -- apparently absent its minister of external affairs G.L. Peiris -- for a less restriction visit to Sri Lanka by his Panel? Or did he agree that his Panel would only “make representations” to the LLRC members? This should be clarified, but Ban's spokesmen have refused to. Watch this site.

* * *

On Sri Lanka, Amid Confusion About Ban's Panel, UN Has Nothing Further to Say

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, December 31 -- At the UN at the end of 2010 confusion reigned, not only on Cote d'Ivoire but also concerning Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's panel on accountability for war crimes in Sri Lanka.

  Rather than answer if the Panel or its staff would travel to the country and under what conditions, Ban's Spokesman on December 31 told Inner City Press “We are aware of your keen interest. If and when there is something to add we will let you know. We have checked again and there is nothing further to say for now... It may be that you do not get answers to every question.”

   Ban on December 17 announced his Panel would go to Sri Lanka, and he praised President Mahinda Rajapaksa for his “flexibility.”

  But later Rajapaksa's Minister of Information Keheliya Rambuklwella said the “panel would only be allowed to give evidence at the LLRC sittings and for no other purpose. 'They will not be permitted to carry out investigations, record evidence or visit places of their choice without prior government approval,'” he said.

  What was the flexibility Ban had praised? What of Ban's acting Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq's statement to BBC's Sinhalese service that the panel might not even go to Sri Lanka, but only speak with the LLRC in some other location?

  Inner City Press, which traveled with and covered Ban's visit to Sri Lanka in May 2009 and has covered the Panel since, all week sought answers from the UN to these questions.

  On December 23 when Inner City Press asked, Haq said there would be no noon briefings for the next 11 days, but that lead spokesman Martin Nesirky would answer questions. Transcript below and here.

   But when Inner City Press submitted Sri Lanka questions to Nesirky and his team from December 26 onward, there was no answer until December 29 -- and then, only a warmed over answer, which Haq reiterated on December 30, ignoring four Inner City Press questions:

From: Farhan Haq [at]
Date: Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:20 PM
To: Inner City Press, Martin Nesirky [at], Soung-ah Choi [at]
Subject: Re: Press Qs on deadline re Sri Lanka & OSSG failure to answer, 13 still outstanding

As I made clear to you at the time, the panel has not confirmed travel to Sri Lanka yet. The arrangements would need to be right. It is NOT the case that the panel would only talk to the LLRC. The panel made clear to me that their work is broader than simply dealing with the LLRC. That's all we have to say on it for now.

Comparing this to Cabinet Spokesperson Minister Keheliya Rambukwella's reported statement about the visas and limits on the Panel, it seemed that either the UN is belatedly standing up to the Rajapaksa government or that the UN doesn't read cited news reports, or both.

And so later on December 30, Inner City Press went to the UN Office of the Spokesman. There, no answers were given to many questions, including these six Sri Lanka questions previously submitted to Haq:

1) did or will the staff of the Panel go to Sri Lanka?

2) what agreements or understanding have been reached about with whom the Panel will speak in Sri Lanka?

3) with whom in the Sri Lanka government did Ban or the UN speak before his Dec 17 announcement, talking into account that the External Affairs Minister Peiris later said he learn of it in the media?

4) why have you refused to answer these questions?

5) did you speak to all three members of the Panel? When?

6) has the UN sought to clarify with the Sri Lanka government that, contrary to what its Cabinet Minister has said, the Panel would speak to people in Sri Lanka beyond the LLRC?

Inner City Press was told that the Office of the Spokesman would be open on December 31. But a visit at 3:25 pm found no one there. Instead, this was sent to Inner City Press:

From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply at
Date: Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Subject: Answers
To: Inner City Press

On Sri Lanka: We are aware of your keen interest. If and when there is something to add we will let you know. We have checked again and there is nothing further to say for now... It may be that you do not get answers to every question.

The results of this stonewalling include articles in Sri Lanka like “Further Confusion Over Experts Panel.” WHY Ban's UN remains silent will be a topic for 2011.

UN's Ban and Mahinda Rajapaksa: Confusions - intentional?

This after a week in which answers had been promised. Here is the UN's December 23 transcript, video here:

Inner City Press: Farhan, when the Secretary-General gave the last press conference here, he said that he was glad to announce that his Panel of Experts on Sri Lanka was going to be able to travel to Sri Lanka. And I’ve seen now this quote of yours — maybe you can confirm it or deny — that “we can’t confirm if the Panel will travel to Sri Lanka or will meet the LLRC [Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission] in some other location”. Is that… What’s the… Are they travelling there? Isn’t that sort of what he announced? And what led to this change?

Acting Deputy Spokesperson Haq: At this stage, there is nothing to announce. We’re working on potential arrangements, so we are in touch with the Sri Lankan authorities. The Panel, that is to say, is in touch. I have talked to the Panel and I know that those discussions are continuing. But at this stage we don’t have an announcement to make on this.

Inner City Press: Aren’t they going to speak to no one else in Sri Lanka, or about the topic, other than the members of the Government’s, the Government-appointed LLRC?

Acting Deputy Spokesperson: Like I said, I think that will become clear once we have some sort of announcement to make. It’s clear that the Panel’s work is broader than simply dealing with the LLRC, however.

Inner City Press: And I just… I am sorry because, I mean, I understand it’s like a holiday season, but is your Office going to be open to answer, who is going to be answering questions there during this coming time?

Acting Deputy Spokesperson: Oh, there is a bunch of us. It won’t be me, but Martin, in fact, will be back this weekend, so there is a lot of us around.

    And then for eight days, and presumably for even three more days after, not a single new answer, while the Minister of Information of Sri Lanka openly contradicts what Ban Ki-moon said on December 17. WHY Ban's UN remains silent will be a topic for 2011. Watch this site.

 Click here for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters footage, about civilian deaths in Sri Lanka.

Click here for Inner City Press' March 27 UN debate

Click here for Inner City Press March 12 UN (and AIG bailout) debate

Click here for Inner City Press' Feb .26 UN debate

Click here for Feb. 12 debate on Sri Lanka

Click here for Inner City Press' Jan. 16, 2009 debate about Gaza

Click here for Inner City Press' review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate

Click here for Inner City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger

Click here from Inner City Press' December 12 debate on UN double standards

Click here for Inner City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics

and this October 17 debate, on Security Council and Obama and the UN.

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for a Reuters AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click here for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund.  Video Analysis here

Feedback: Editorial [at]

UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

  Search  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] -