On
Congo
Rapes, DPKO Faces Council Questions, New Element
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 26 -- On the Congo rape scandal, the UN Department of
Peacekeeping Operations faced a rare barrage of questions from some
Security Council members on Thursday morning. Inner City Press is
told that DPKO has been asked for a copy of the July 30 e-mail noting
the incursion of rebels into the area the 154 rapes would take place,
and telling humanitarian workers to stay away.
The
forthcoming
Council press statement, the initial four elements of which Inner
City Press exclusively
published before the meeting, is being
expanded with a fifth paragraph. Ambassador Susan Rice, it is said,
will speak to the Press after the meeting and the Statement, to be
read by Russia's Vitaly Churkin, the Council president for August.
Other
members
concerned with protection of civilians include Mexico, whose
Permanent Representative Claude Heller said, even in this week's
Council meeting on piracy, that “Mexico condemns and rejects these
acts of sexual violence which cannot remain unpunished and deserve a
categorical condemnation from the international community,” and
“the Security Council should address in the appropriate time this
serious issue.”
So
if this is not
the appropriate time, when is? Watch this site.
* * *
On
Congo
Rapes, Email About Rebels Exposes UN Lies, Security Council's Buzzword
“Elements”
Must Extend to Probe of UN
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 26 -- Amid the growing scandal of
the mass rapes on
Congo, 30 kilometers from the UN peacekeepers of MONUSCO, the UN
Security Council is belated set to meet on August 26. In advance of
the meeting, Inner City Press, which was the first to
report the scheduling of the meeting, exclusively obtained the
elements of
the planned Council press statement that were circulated to members
on August 25:
1)
Condemnation
in the strongest terms and expression of deep concern
for these attacks;
2)
Demand
for complete cessation of all acts of sexual violence;
3)
Call
on the Government to fight impunity and investigate the matter;
and
4)
Welcome
the dispatching of Assistant Secretary General Atul Khare.
This
collection of
buzzwords of the UN Security Council was circulated before the
leaking,
late of August 25, of news of
“an
e-mail alert from the United Nations Department of Safety and
Security [which] was sent to United Nations staff members on July 30,
the day the rapes began. The message warned them to stay away from
the area — part of Walikale, in the North Kivu Province of Congo —
because it had been taken over by rebels. 'Everyone got that e-mail,'
said an officer from a humanitarian organization in the area, who
spoke on the condition of anonymity on strict instructions from the
organization. 'That rebel elements were active in those specific
villages, and humanitarian workers should not go there.'”
Numerous
participants
in the August 25 video link up of MONUSCO chief Roger
Meece with correspondents at UN headquarters immediately concluded
that Meece had “lied through his teeth,” as more than one of them
put it. Others said that the UN lying went beyond Meece, to nearly
all communications on the rape scandal.
On
August 23 and
24, after Inner City Press first asked about the rapes at that day's
UN noon briefing, Spokesman Martin Nesirky claimed that the first
MONUSCO and the UN knew of the rebels' incursion and the rapes was on
August 12. He repeated this date again and again: “August 12,
Matthew, August 12.”
On
August 25,
Meece carefully moved away from this account, acknowledging that
there was some knowledge -- vague, as he put it -- of rebels in the
area. But, according to Meece, when the MONUSCO peacekeepers went
out on patrol on August 7, they went the other way, away from the
site of the rapes.
With
news that
they “all” got the e-mail on July 30 saying that rebels were in
the specific villages and that humanitarian workers should stay away,
both accounts appear in a different light, as does the UN
peacekeepers' inaction from July 30 on, and decision to head away
from the village with their patrol.
“Maybe
humanitarian workers should run the other way from rebels intent on
rape,” one correspondent told Inner City Press. “But if the UN
peacekeepers, charged with protecting civilians, won't do so, and lie
about what they knew and when, somebody has to get fired. Don't
they?”
This
is the UN, so
one never knows. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has said, through
Nesirky and not in person, that he is outraged by the rapes. But will
he be outraged by his own officials' lying? What will he do about it?
While
NGO
representative William Cragin of the International Medical Corps was
initially quoted that the UN and aid workers knew about the rebels'
presence from July 30 on, when IMC in California was called on August
25, the group's Margaret Aguirre said we work with the UN agencies
and want to continue to work with them.
Suddenly,
IMC's
Ms. Aguirre said, Cragin was traveling and unavailable to speak, for
the foreseeable future. As Inner City Press asked Meece in revealing
this communication, this smacks of explicit or implicit retaliation
and cover up which must going forward be acted on.
Ban
belated
dispatched ASG Khare and his Sexual Violence and Conflict envoy
Margot Wallstrom to the Congo. Khare, previously the UN's top
official in Timor Leste, dodged the Press on August 23.
Earlier
this
summer, in a rare media availability beside top UN peacekeeper Alain
Le Roy -- not heard from yet on this DPKO scandal -- Khare answered
Inner City Press' question about the displacement of tens of
thousands of people by fighting in the Congo by insisting the UN had
not offered logistical support to the Congolese Army in that case.
But isn't the UN supposed to be concerned about the plight of
civilians? Or do they run the other way?
Margot
Wallstrom,
when asked what she has actually done about the Congo and the issue
of rape as a tool of war since assuming her position, offered little
more than platitudes. Her lack of action on this incidence of mass
rape, since July 30, or August 4, or August 7, or August 12, calls
into question the seriousness of the office and mandate,
necessitating a full review and changes.
More
pressingly on
August 26, how the Security Council members deal with this new
information?
UN's Ban and US' Rice, action on
MONUSCO's misdeeds and UN misstatements not yet shown
While some
members may argue that the information is
too new, and try to stick to the earlier circulated elements, that
would be nearly complicity in MONUSCO's and the presenters' misdeeds.
The
Council nearly
always mechanically offers unqualified support to the UN peacekeeping
operations it has sent out into the field. When, for example, UN
peacekeepers are found to be involved in sexual abuse or
exploitation, the Council rarely takes it up, preferring to refer
obliquely to this in some future statement.
Here,
any credible
meeting or Statement purporting to address the mass rapes must
address the role of MONUSCO's inaction. One or more elements would
have to be added to the above, such as an independent outside
investigation of MONUSCO's action and failures to act, and UN
officials' statements since July 30.
As
Inner City
Press asked Meece about on August 25, Belgium's foreign minister has
already called for an investigation. But now the Council, which has
only recently ordered investigations into the Gaza
flotilla assault,
the shoot out between Israel and Lebanon and the violence in
Darfur's
Kalma Camp, seems required to set in motion an investigation of the
UN's own actions. We'll see -- watch this site.
Footnotes:
as
Inner City Press has repeatedly been told since it began asking
about the Congo rapes on August 24, France is the Security Council
“lead” on all things DRCongo. Questions to the French charge
d'affaires have not, to put it mildly, resulted in response of the
seriously seemingly required.
US
Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton, as pointed
out by two
recent Madame
Secretary
blogs, traveled to Goma in the DRC to show the Obama
administration's
seriously about the issue of rape as a tool of war.
While US
Permanent Representative to the UN Susan Rice has been at the
Security Council this week, she has not take any Press questions on
the unfolding scandal. Earlier this year, when she declined to
go on and skipped both the planned and rescheduled
and shortened Council trip to the DR Congo, she did not explain.
Her office
issued a written statement on the
night of August 24, followed by tweets from her personal
AmbassadorRice Twitter account about a US Mission's basketball win
and shout-out to Jason Lang, team MVP.
While
it has been
argued to Inner City Press that such sports tweets are humanizing,
and Inner City Press does not disagree, now that misdeeds and
misspeaking by the UN itself have been revealed, what will Susan
Rice, Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration do about it? Each
Council member state faces a similar moment of decision. This is a
test: watch this site.
* * *
, 
