Inner City Press


Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the United Nations to Wall Street to the Inner City

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis


In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

,



Follow us on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



After UN Gives Waiver for LRA But Not FDLR, ICP Asks Delattre Why

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, March 19 -- After the UN Security Council's open meeting about the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the UN Mission there on March 19, DRC Foreign Minister Raymond Tshibanda told Inner City Press that the UN had given waivers and worked on Itura and against the Lord's Resistance Army with the two Congolese generals it now refuses to support to fight the FDLR militia.

   This give rise to the question, if the UN Security Council says neutralizing the FDLR is so important, why is MONUSCO or DPKO in New York applying a more strict standard for UN support to this fight than they did to the fight against the LRA?

   When UN Security Council President for March Francois Delattre of France emerged after Council consultations, Inner City Press asked him just this.

  Delattre's answer, video here, was about the UN's stated Human Rights Due Diligence Policy, but did not explain why a waiver was sought and granted for the LRA fight, and now not to fight the FDLR.

From the French Mission to the UN's transcript:

Inner City Press : On the due diligence policy, the foreign Minister Tshibanda here said that the two generals had issued that MONUSCO had previously worked with them in Ituri and on the LRA. So, some people are left wondering, if fighting the FDLR is so important, why was a waiver given to other fight and not for this one ? Despite how important the policy is. What has changed that MONUSCO canít find a way to be involved or fight the FDLR directly ?

A: Here, our understanding is that, as you said, this question is really part of the UN human rights due diligence policy. This policy has been in place in DRC for many years and has proven its usefulness to ensure that all military operations in DRC are conducted in accordance with human rights and international humanitarian law. So we have a framework here and we fully support this policy in DRC and elsewhere by the way.

 Inner City Press began to ask this follow-up on the waiver but was cut off. While others spin, we will continue with this question - watch this site.


 

Share |

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City Press at UN

Click for  BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
  Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com