Inner City Press

In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Share |   

Follow on TWITTER
 More: InnerCityPro

MRL on Patreon

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis


(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka


FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"




Bank Beat

Freedom of Information

How to Contact Us

On North Korea, UN's Guterres Praises China's Xi, Silent on Gifts Violating Sanctions, WIPO's Cyanide Work, Ng

By Matthew Russell Lee, Full Exclusive, Video, Q&A

UNITED NATIONS, April 2 – On the North Korea - Trump talks by May announced on March 8, the UN and Secretary General Antonio Guterres have repeatedly sought to inflate the role of the UN. Now in Beijing on his way to the Boao Forum for Asia (Inner City Press coverage here), Guterres has issued a read out of his meeting with Xi Jinping, "congratulated President Xi on his recent re-election and expressed appreciation for the President’s support to the work of the United Nations. The United Nations continues to count on China’s leadership and commitment to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, including through international cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative. The Secretary-General commended China’s consistent and constructive advocacy for a diplomatic solution to the situation on the Korean Peninsula." Apparently not mentioned, like the pattern of UN bribery of the conviction of Macau based businessman Ng Lap Seng and the indictment of CEFC China Energy's Patrick Ho, was Xi's recent expensive gifts to Kim Jong Un, in seeming violation of UN sanctions. Then again, the UN's own World Intellectual Property Organization helped on North Korea's cyanide patents without telling the 1718 Committee. We'll have more on this. On April 2 Trump's White House had this, amid reports of the marginalization of Japan: "President Donald J. Trump will welcome Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan to Mar-a-Lago from April 17-18, 2018.  President Trump and Prime Minister Abe’s third summit meeting will reaffirm the United States-Japan alliance as a cornerstone of peace, stability, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region. The two leaders will discuss the international campaign to maintain maximum pressure on North Korea in advance of President Trump’s planned meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. President Trump and Prime Minister Abe will explore ways to expand fair and reciprocal trade and investment ties between the United States and Japan, two of the world’s wealthiest and most innovative economies." This comes as Abe's Foreign Minister Taro Kono is talking about Kim Jong Un preparing for another nuclear test, and a bid to increase focus on the issue of Taiwan, on which we'll have more. On March 27 at the UN the questions were about whether Kim Jong UN did or didn't travel to Beijing in a green train. The UN spokesman Farhan Haq called it speculation. Then the next day after it was confirmed he issued a canned statement by Antonio Guterres, striving to remain relevant. Now on March 30 from the US Mission to the UN, this: "Today, the U.S. Mission to the United Nations secured Security Council support for the largest-ever UN sanctions designation package on North Korea. The UN Security Council’s 1718 North Korea Sanctions Committee unanimously approved 49 new UN designations – 21 shipping companies, one individual, and 27 ships – all aimed at countering North Korea’s illegal maritime smuggling activities to obtain oil and sell coal, and preventing certain entities and ships from aiding them in these efforts. These new designations were proposed last month by the U.S. Mission to coincide with the announcement of the U.S. Treasury Department’s largest-ever North Korea sanctions package, and are part of a coordinated U.S. government effort with our allies and partners to continue the maximum pressure campaign on the North Korean regime and systematically shut down its maritime smuggling activities. 'The approval of this historic sanctions package is a clear sign that the international community is united in our efforts to keep up maximum pressure on the North Korean regime. We want to thank the members of the Security Council, as well as Japan and South Korea, for working with us to keep up the pressure and for their commitment to implementing UN Security Council resolutions and holding violators accountable,' said Ambassador Haley." But as even the UN Group of Experts noted, the UN's World Intellectual Property Organization didn't tell the Committee when it worked on North Korea's cyanide patents. Separately, the UN accepted as a Junior Professional Officer a Workers Party official's son. At the UN on March 29 Guterres' outgoing chief of political affairs Jeffrey Feltman held his swansong press conference. Inner City Press asked Feltman why his Department accepted from North Korea the son of a Workers Party official, Kim Joo Song, as UN Junior Professional Officer, in elections no less. Video here. Feltman replied that the UN tries to ask countries for multiple candidates. Did they do so here? Were all put forward related to party officials? Does the UN have no other standards? Inner City Press asked and reported it, from inside the briefing room. Sankei Shimbun's ostensibly UN correspondent Mayu Uetsuka missed the story, and will be missing more, desperately seeking second hand UN connections for no purpose. We'll have more on this. Now from the border of the Koreas, this news: Kim Jong Un will meet Moon Jae-in at Panmunjom on April 27; there will be another preparatory meeting on April 4 to discuss protocol, security and media coverage issues. That train is moving. From the UN, where the March 29 noon press briefing has been canceled in exchange for a Guterres "press encounter" on the topic of climate change, this: "Following the recent talks held in Beijing between the leaders of the People’s Republic of China and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), the Secretary-General welcomes the reported commitment by the DPRK to denuclearization. He views the latest positive developments as the start of a longer process of sincere dialogue, leading to sustainable peace and denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula." Increasingly, today's UN is UNrelevant. On March 27 the US White House issued this: "From White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders: In Response to the Chinese government’s announcement of Kim Jong Un’s visit:  'The Chinese government contacted the White House earlier on Tuesday to brief us on Kim Jong Un's visit to Beijing. The briefing included a personal message from President Xi to President Trump, which has been conveyed to President Trump. The United States remains in close contact with our allies South Korea and Japan. We see this development as further evidence that our campaign of maximum pressure is creating the appropriate atmosphere for dialogue with North Korea.'" While earlier at the UN some laughed at the questions, at least when posed by US conservative media OAN, Japanese conservative media Sankei Shinbun didn't even purport to cover it. Instead, perhaps to distract from the current Moritomo Gakuen scandal decline of their standard bearer Shinzo Abe amid Sankei's attacks on his wife Akie, Sankei's Mayu Uetsuka filed a co-byline with Hiroyuki Kano from Washington DC for the March For Our Lives event. This is the same Mayu Uetsuka who ignored, even though informed through the channel accepted by her predecessor Jun Kurosawa, all information about the UN promoting not only automatic weapons but also tanks and rocket launchers. This is incompetence, this is corruption. And it will continue to be opposed. Are these glaring omissions known to correspondents  Krose Etsuia, Norio Sakurai in Seoul, and even, in London, Okabe Shinbun? To say nothing of actually detained Tatsuya Kato who at least then defended press freedom, then with Jun Kurosawa UNdeclared?Again, one view of where (and when) a Trump meeting with Kim Jong Un should take place was voiced March 9 by none other than John Bolton, now slated as National Security Adviser: by the end of March, in Geneva. Bolton said it should be in the same "former League of Nations" conference room where James Baker met Tariq Aziz in January 1991 before Operation Desert Storm, the so-called extra mile for peace. Others throw out locations like Pyongyang, New York, Seoul, Tokyo (if Trump wants to throw Abe a bone, see below) or even Mar-a-Lago.  The timing of Trump's meeting with Bolton shortly before the North Korea talks were announced bears more reporting. At the UN by mid-morning on March 9, this was not listed on the Security Council's online Program of Work. Photo here. In Japan, no longer on the Security Council, media like the Sankei Shimbun complained instead about the issue of abductees and about Trump's dissing of Japan on tariffs, while using wire or "joint" copy on the Florida gun bill, UN Women's Day and even on UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres' canned statement. From Seoul, Kato's successor Norio Sakurai warned of Japan being "peeled off." Similarly, in North Korea itself the ostensibly agreed to talks weren't even yet disclosed to the public. Working at the UN, Inner City Press asked the spokesman for Miroslav Lajcak, President of the UN General Assembly, for comment on the North Korea talks. By evening, this was sent to Inner City Press: "The President supports dialogue as well as efforts to denuclearize the Koran Peninsula." Earlier, Inner City Press asked the Dutch President of the Council for the month, Karel van Oosterom, who told Inner City Press he has been invited to a meeting with McMaster but for more to ask the US. In DC the questions were about McMaster leaving the Administration, with a less than rousing defense by the spokesperson. When the UN Spokesman called his end of day (and week) lid, there was mention of another Security Council meeting for Monday, but nothing on North Korea. Meanwhile, when UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres belatedly commented 17 hours after the announcement, his spokesman Stephane Dujarric went on to link to the slated talks the earlier visit to Pyongyang by outgoing UN Department of Political Affairs chief Jeffrey Feltman. But is the connection? And when Feltman leaves on March 31, who will the US put in, particularly given developments on and in North Korea? Watch this site. Back on March 8, half an hour after South Korean official Chung Eui-yong announced at the White House that US President Trump will meet North Korea's Kim Jong Un by May, Inner City Press after informing the UN's Department of Public Information sought reaction from Secretary General Antonio Guterres. Since, despite Inner City Press' request, all UN Department of Public Information minders had left for the day, Inner City Press retreated to the Conference Building where a Chinese opera, as it happens, was taking place. But when Guterres and his entourage came off the elevator, Inner City Press approached, at the same time as one of Guterres' female Assistant SGs he'd met with. Guterres, chatting with a youth, ignored even her. Video here. Did he know the news? Inner City Press followed up by Twitter: nothing. This is today's UN.  Two cars were at the ready, and two security officers faced Inner City Press. (One said that yet a third officer "wanted to file a complaint against your story," here). There was the sound of opera, and down the hall a painting of Ban Ki-moon, who accomplished nothing on the issue in ten years. It was the UN. The next morning, still nothing from Guterres. Finally after 17 hours, this canned statement from his spokesman: "The Secretary-General is encouraged by the announcement of an agreement between the United States and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to hold a summit meeting by May. He commends the leadership and vision of all concerned and reiterates his support for all efforts towards peaceful denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in accordance with relevant Security Council resolutions." And now re-emerge reports about North Korea "state actors" hacking the UN's Panel of Experts and its members. But the reports fail to mention that UN Secretary General and his outgoing head of Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman allowed into the UN's own Department of Political Affairs a North Korean state actor, the son of a Workers Party official. (Inner City Press exclusively reported the name,  Kim Joo Song). If UN DPA, in charge of the sanctions committees' panels of experts, let a sanctioned countries state actor in as a staff member / junior professional officer, how surprising is it? The worst is that is wasn't idealistic multilateralism that led to the hire, DPA whistleblowers tell Inner City Press, but rather Guterres' vain desire to see himself in Pyongyang, a diplomatic victory at last as he ignores the suffering in places like western Cameroon. In the face of North Korea sanctions, the UN in December 2017 used the sanctioned Foreign Trade Bank and Russia's Sputnik Bank to release EUR 3,974,920.62 into the country, documents obtained by Inner City Press and exclusively published on February 21 show. On February 21, Inner City Press asked the Dutch chair of the UN Security Council's 1718 Sanctions committee about the exemption. He refused to comment, saying the issue did not come up in the meeting he had just exited. Video here, but see below. Now amid renewed focus in the lead up to the belated release of the UN Panel of Experts report, the Washington Post has done a deep dive into North Korea's laundering of coal: " The Togolese-flagged Yu Yuan and the Panamanian-flagged Sky Angel, both Chinese owned, were among two separate sets of cargo vessels that passed in and out of Kholmsk harbor in late summer and early fall of last year, carrying coal that at least partly originated in North Korean mines" - and ended up, the report goes on, in South Korea and Japan. This while Japanese media, particularly those ostensibly most hard line, go soft not only on the UN (see below) but also on Japan's own Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi, which turned a blind computer eye to business with North Korea, then fled the New York regulator while being investigated, see below. Also now amid renewed focus on Sisi's Egypt as purchaser and selling-place for North Korean weapons, US President Donald J. Trump on March 4 spoke with Sisi, and the US issued this, without even a mention with North Korea: "President Donald J. Trump spoke today with President Abdel Fattah Al Sisi of Egypt.  President Trump and President Al Sisi discussed opportunities to enhance the American-Egyptian partnership on a range of security and economic issues.  The leaders discussed Russia and Iran’s irresponsible support of the Assad regime’s brutal attacks against innocent civilians.  President Trump and President Al Sisi agreed to work together on ending the humanitarian crisis in Syria and achieving Arab unity and security in the region." And not the 30,000 RPGs? A new light is cast on UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres' "very very warm regards" for Sisi this week, in a credentialing ceremony which Guterres' close protection ordered Inner City Press to stop recording, here.  Thirty thousand rocket propelled grenades could generally quite a bit of warmth - the last Panel of Experts report cited "the Jie Shun, a vessel commanded by a Democratic People’s Republic of Korea captain that was en route from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea towards the Suez Canal. A search revealed a cargo containing 30,000 PG-7 rocket propelled grenades and related subcomponents in wooden crates concealed under about 2,300 tonnes of limonite." In terms of Guterres' Lusophone world, the last PoE report said that "at the time of the Panel’s visit [to Angola], 12 nationals of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea were providing martial arts and parade ground training. The Panel informed Angolan agencies that continuation of the training would constitute a violation of paragraph 9 of resolution 2270 (2016), which clarified the prohibition on the hosting of personnel from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea for security force training, established under resolution 1874... the Panel enquired with the Government of Angola as to whether they had departed the country. The Panel has yet to receive a reply." The new report has yet to go on the Committee's website. On March 2, before the silence procedure expired on the United States' request to add to the sanctions list 27 companies, one individual and 33 ships, silence was broken by China and the listing did not proceed. This as the UN has held off sanctioning Chinese banks like China Merchants Bank, and China Construction Bank Corporation, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and Agricultural Bank of China for their business with Dandong Hongxiang Industrial Development. But how will it, and the UN more generally be covered going forward? Day to day those most interested in the UN's 1718 committee are Japanese media. While certainly predisposed to reporting on any moves by China, less scrutiny is given to the UN itself. Perhaps this is because of Japan's long and unrequited desire for a permanent seat on the Security Council, pursued without effect by playing nice with the UN. Consider a recent profile of Secretary General Antonio Guterres by the Sankei Shimbun, casting Guterres and more decisive than his predecessor Ban Ki-moon. One, that's not saying much. Two, along the same lines, Ban at least audited the Ng Lap Seng UN bribery case, something Guterres has yet to do with the larger China Energy Fund Committee / CEFC China Energy UN bribery scandal, with the company now taken over by the Shanghai government. Three, the combative or defensive approach to China is mirrored by one by South Korea, particularly as that country refuses to give up on the issue of comfort women used by Japan in World War II. Notably, the misogyny is replicated in the microcosm of the United Nations. The same publication has had its #MeToo moments, in and out of Manhattan (female correspondents it is said are not allowed to have children during their deployments); local hires regardless of years of effective service are threatened with termination for not immediately dropping their young children. As the law has evolved in the United States that could of course be turned around. We'll have more on this - and on this: on March 2 a spokesperson for the chair of the Committee told Inner City Press, "As chair of 1718 committee we cannot comment on internal committee issues." Inner City Press has asked why the delegation, president of the Security Council for March, doesn't have a public schedule and read-outs, like the President of the General Assembly does. We'll have more on this. Meanwhile a complaint to the Committee by Japan about a Maldives flagged ship Xin Yuan 18 has drawn return fire from the embattled government of President Yameen: "No such vessel is registered in the country," his Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement on Wednesday. 'Further we condemn, in the strongest possible terms, the use of our National Flag in a manner so as to tarnish the good standing and reputation of our nation and that of our people. The Maldivian authorities do not allow flag of convenience to foreign owned vessels to operate outside Maldivian waters,' the statement added. The Government of Maldives gives high priority to the implementation of all resolutions of the United Nations Security Council, including the Resolutions on Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). The Administration is currently investigating the matter and wishes to make clear that the Maldives will pursue aggressive action against any such acts which affects the National Identity in such a detrimental manner." Inner City Press has asked the chairmanship if Maldives has formally responded to the Committee; separately, the Panel of Experts' report is due on March 14, photo here. Japan said that 'at midnight on February 24, 2018, a P-3C aircraft of Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (Fleet Air Wing 1 P-3C : Kanoya) found that Chon Ma San, North Korean-flagged tanker, was lying alongside Xin Yuan 18, Maldivian-flagged tanker, on the high sea (around 250 km eastern offshore of Shanghai ) in the East China Sea. Judging from the fact that the two vessels lay alongside each other with their lights turned on at night, both vessels could have been engaged in some type of activity. Following a comprehensive assessment, the Government of Japan strongly suspects that they conducted ship-to-ship transfers banned by UNSCR." Meanwhile in the matter Inner City Press is exclusively pursuing, a letter from Sputnik Bank stated that "unauthorized person (I.V. Tonkih) led  negotiations with Korean party on interbank correspondent relationship." Photos here, more documents in PDF now published on Patreon, here. On February 22, Inner City Press asked UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric about how Sputnik Bank, given its admission, was selected, and then additional questions in writing, below - which Dujarric would not answer or confirm. Video here.

From the UN transcript: Inner City Press: I wanted to ask you quickly about a thing in North Korea.  I've learned yesterday and published the documents of a waiver sought by the UN system, he UN Resident Coordinator, Tapan Mishra. To use a, some say little-known, but, in any case, not a prominent Russian bank as a correspondent bank to send €4 million into North Korea in December.  And I wanted to know, first of all, how is the bank… there's a document that's… that's part of the request that shows that the Russian bank acknowledges that an unauthorized person even negotiated the correspondent bank relationship.  How does the UN system choose which correspondent bank to use?  And is this comment… is this… it seemed like they presented this as an emergency for third-quarter disbursements of 4 million euros into North Korea…Spokesman:  Listen, I don't know the details of the agreement.  What I do know is that the UN operates, has humanitarian presence and has a presence in Pyongyang.  We abide… the DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea], as you know, is under very strict sanctions from the Security Council, which include issues of the banking sector.  We do need to get money to pay staff and to run our programmes.  I think it's only normal that we go through the Sanctions Committee to get the waivers.  We don't want to be… obviously, the Secretariat doesn't want to be in violation of Security Council resolutions.  To say that dealing with the banking sector in terms of banks that are willing to do business legitimately in the DPRK is challenging would probably be an understatement.  But whatever rules there are, I have no doubt that they were followed. Inner City Press:  So, simple question, is this… is this put out… is there a procurement for this?  I'm asking you because there's some questions about how the bank was selected even from… their own documents acknowledge some irregularities.  So how… can you look? Spokesman:  As I said, I don't have further details.  I can look into it, but I know we're working in a very challenging environment in trying to follow the rules and regulations to the 'T.'"  To the T? Inner City Press has also aske in writing, "Please state the total of funds the UN system (including specifically the agencies named in the Resident Coordinator's request) transferred in 2017 to DPRK, including total for program use (development assistance) and total for UN use (maintenance, local salaries, etc). When was the last audit of UN activities in North Korea / DPRK done? There will be more." In 2017 then-chairman of the UN Security Council's 1718 / North Korea sanctions committee Sebastiano Cardi of Italy informed Sputnik Bank to release the nearly EUR 4 million to the Foreign Trade Bank - the very entity for dealing with Latvia's ABLV Bank has been sanctioned by the United States.

   Previously, Cardi by letter had, according to UN Resient Coordinator Tapan Mishra, neglected to "make clear reference to the need for cash withdrawal." The Treasurer of the UN Development Program Paul Gravanese then asked Cardi for wider authorization for FTB to withdraw funds. This only concerned the third quarter of 2017 - what has been done since? The new chairman declined to say.

  Others say, the UN has fixed nothing, sweeps everything uner the rug.  Earlier this month when Inner City Press asked if the Committee's rulings on request for exemptions, and the underlying requests themselves, are placed on the Committee's website or otherwise made public. The answer was and is no.  Inner City Press will have more in this exclusive series. Media paid to cover the UN too often let it off the hook, on issues from North Korea to UN corruption to most recently automatic weapons. The UN has been the venue for bribes paid from Macau based operative Ng Lap Seng and now Patrick Ho of the China Energy Fund Committee - but on February 13 in the same basement the North Korea sanctions committee meets in the UN allowed an Indonesia based weapons company to advertise not only machine guns and drones but even tanks inside the UN. Periscope video here. But when the Japanese media paid to cover the UN belatedly chime in on gun control, like Sankei Shimbun's Mayu Uetsuka here, they ignored the UN's total failure in even advertising guns after the Florida shooting. They could have covered it, and still could; their Mr Tatsuya Kato in South Korea, whom Inner City Press supported here and here, and also in Sankei, proves there is something to support on a free Press basis. But. As the North Korea UN sanctions "experts" report continues to be cherry picked further and further down the food chain, now that North Korea paid its 2017 UN dues by means of a swap is also ignored, like the recent report focused on coal, pointing the finger at Vietnam, Russia, China, Vietnam and South Korea. Omitted, apparently intentionally, are violations by Japanese companies, like Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi, as Inner City Press has reported. It is facts chucked or thrown, rather than fact checked. How far will today's UN go to placate some countries, while ignoring others and restricting the Press? On January 26 UN "global communications" chief Alison Smale flew to Charleston, South Carolina for a photo op and UNTV video with China's Xiamen Airlines for having painting the UN's "SDGs" logo on the side of an airplane. This without having answered Press questions about her Department of Public Information's malfeasance with resources allocated by the General Assembly for Kiswahili and about the lack under her "leadership" of any content neutral UN media access rules. Afterward, when Inner City Press asked for the mp4 video of her South Carolina junket - Inner City Press is informed that the plane she celebrated could not in fact fly - it was told to "Ask UN Webcast," which is under Smale. They were asked - and have not given the video. Nor has Smale offered any response to a detailed petition two weeks ago, while re-tweeting her former employer the NYT and current boss Antonio Guterres. But who is making who look bad? And how can a former NYT editor have no content neutral media access rules, and no answers? As she restricts Inner City Press from its UN reporting on Cameroon, Myanmar, Kenya, Yemen and elsewhere? We'll have more on this. While any country would try to get the UN to promote its airline, if the UN would do it, Smale is the UN official who responsible for Inner City Press being restricted and evicted as it reports on the UN bribery scandal of Patrick Ho and China Energy Fund Committee. Smale hasn't even deigned to answer petitions in this regard, in September (she said she recognized the need for the "courtesy" of a response, never given) and in January -- too busy flying to South Carolina to promote an airline:

Today's UN of Antonio Guterres, who just met with ICC indictee Omar al Bashir, and his Deputy Amina J. Mohammed who has refused Press questions on her rosewood signatures and now the refoulement of 47 people to Cameroon from "her" Nigeria, has become a place of corruption and censorship. On January 30 as Inner City Press sought to complete its reporting for the day on Guterres' Bashir meeting and Mohammed's Cameroon no-answer, it had a problem. It was invited to the month's UN Security Council president's end of presidency reception, 6:30 to 8:30 - but with its accreditation reduced by censorship, it could not get back into the UN after 7 pm, to the already delayed UN video. It ran to at least enter the reception - but the elevator led to a jammed packed third floor, diplomats lined up to shake the outgoing UNSC president's hand. Inner City Press turn to turn tail back to the UN, passing on its way favored, pro-UN correspondents under no such restriction. Periscope here. Inner City Press has written about this to the head of the UN Department of Public Information Alison Smale, in Sepember 2017 - no answer but a new threat - and this month, when Smale's DPI it handing out full access passes to no-show state media. No answer at all: pure censorship, for corruption. Smale's DPI diverted funds allocated for Kiswahili, her staff say, now saying they are targeted for retaliation. This is today's UN. Amid UN bribery scandals, failures in countries from Cameroon to Yemen and declining transparency, today's UN does not even pretend to have content neutral rules about which media get full access and which are confined to minders or escorts to cover the General Assembly.

Inner City Press, which while it pursue the story of Macau-based businessman Ng Lap Seng's bribery of President of the General Assembly John Ashe was evicted by the UN Department of Public Information from its office, is STILL confined to minders as it pursues the new UN bribery scandal, of Patrick Ho and Cheikh Gadio allegedly bribing President of the General Assembly Sam Kutesa, and Chad's Idriss Deby, for CEFC China Energy.

Last week Inner City Press asked UN DPI where it is on the list to be restored to (its) office, and regain full office - and was told it is not even on the list, there is no public list, the UN can exclude, permanently, whomever it wants. This is censorship.


Feedback: Editorial [at]

Past (and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

 Search  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] for