In
Darfur
as Kalma Camp Faces Closure and IDP Sorting, UN Spokesman & DPKO
Silent,
OCHA in Sudan Concerned
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 22 -- In South Darfur the Kalma Camp, which the
Sudanese
government blockaded and starved for two weeks with
surprising little said by the UN, is now slated to be closed,
officials said over the weekend.
The remaining residents, estimated
by the UN at 50,000, will be separated into two camps in Bileel. Some
wonder from past practices if the governmental sorting will be
along political or ethnic lines, presaging further blockages and
attacks on internally displaced persons.
On
August 20,
Inner City Press asked the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations
for its update on the Kalma Camp. DPKO said it had provided an update
that day, and every recent day, to UN spokesman Martin Nesirky for
his noon press briefing.
But Nesirky
has decided to only provide the
Darfur information if he allows a question on the topic; later on
August 20 he chided Inner City Press to not tell
him about rules or
asking questions. “It is my briefing,” he said.
Contacted
again
on August 22, DPKO still did not provide the update it gave Nesirky
on August 20, but said it would do so on August 23.
Thus
Inner City
Press reached out to the UN Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs spokesman in Sudan, Samuel Hendricks, who
provided the following update:
Subject:
Re:
Press request re Kalma Camp
From: Samuel Hendricks at
UN.org
To: Inner City Press
Date: Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM
Mr.
Lee,
Thanks
for
your message. Latest info on Kalma as follows... Estimate of
current camp population thus remains around 50,000; location of many
Kalma residents remains unconfirmed... Motorized water pumps are
functioning; fuel shipment will be needed in coming days, NGO will
seek permission to transport.
Food
distribution
in neighboring Bileil camp for Kalma IDPs still awaiting
provision of list from camp leaders (sheikhs); distribution
contingent on proof of Kalma residence (ie, ration cards).
Regarding
the
issue of closure/movement of Kalma camp: Local media has reported
Gov't identifying new site for Kalma IDPs. Humanitarian Team (UN and
NGOs) in South Darfur will meet to discuss issue of proposed new
site, as there are various implications. The UN cannot support any
movement of IDPs that is not voluntary or otherwise appropriate.
Kids in Darfur between
two UN vehicles, "don't tell
me about rules"
Until
such a time as a suitable location and facilities are
established, and decision reached on movements in full consultation
with IDP community of the camp, IDPs in Kalma camp should continue to
have access to humanitarian assistance as required.
But
will this
statement of UN principle be implemented by DPKO and envoy Ibrahim
Gambari? The government is already claiming that the NGOs have
approved the new sites, and the sorting process.
IDPs continue
to
insist that Gambari threatened to turn six of them over to Sudanese
authorities if they did not agree to government patrols of the camps.
The UN denies this. We'll see. Watch this site.
* * *
As
Sudan
Expels
UN Officials from Darfur for Rape Detection, UN Silent,
Menkerios One Year & Out, Gration's Khartoum Jaunt
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August
18 -- As in West Darfur UN officials are being
expelled for distributing rape detection equipment and collecting
signatures on an anti-hunger petition, the UN in New York insists on
saying nothing, trying desperately to ingratiate itself to Sudanese
authorities.
After
a
spokesman
for
the
UN Food and Agriculture Organization confirmed the expulsion
of its official for circulating the petition on hunger, Inner City
Press asked the Spokesman for Ban Ki-moon about this, and the
expulsion of other UN officials for conducting research into rape in
Darfur. Video here,
from
Minute 17:41.
Nesirky
insisted,
contrary
to the FAO confirmation, that the UN has “still
received no official notification,” is still speaking with the
government and “can't say any more.”
But
doesn't this
reflect a split of the UN Secretariat from from FAO, which confirms
the expulsions? Nesirky pointed back at his own answer, that he
“can't say anymore.” Can't or won't?
Ironically,
Nesirky
moderated
an August 6 press conference by Margot Wallstrom,
the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual
Violence in Conflict, at which Ms. Wallstrom said that Sudan would be
a major focus of her offices since rape by “men in uniform” is
widespread there. Video here.
How
can the UN
work on the issue of rape in Sudan it is lets its personnel be
expelled for distributing rape detection equipment, and then refuses
to defend them or even speak about the case?
UN's Ban and Wallstrom on rape, comment on Sudan
expulsions not shown
Inner
City
Press
also asked if the UN is facilitating or helping the visit to Sudan by
US Envoy Scott Gration. While some said
with this trip Gration would
be addressing his perceived disinterested in Darfur, now this trip
is
reported to be mostly about the North - South conflict and the
referendum.
So
who in the UN
would be facilitating his trip -- Haile Menkerios, the head of the UN
Misssion in Sudan? Earlier this week, Inner City Press asked
Nesirky's acting deputy Farhan Haq to confirm that Menkerios only
went to Sudan begrudgingly, with a deal to come back to New York and
his Department of Political Affairs job in at most one year.
Video here,
near
end.
That is
the informal understanding, Haq said. What does this say about the
UN's commitment to protecting civilians in Sudan?
Another
joke
making
that rounds is that while Sudan may throw out the UNAMID mission, it
would allow UNAMID chief Ibrahim Gambari to stay. Others say Gambari,
despite all odds, may have his eye on the top post in his native
Nigeria. We'll see.
* * *
In
Darfur,
UN
Is
Forced To Correct Its Fast Thanks to Sudan, Kalma Camp Problems,
Expulsions and UN Silence Persist
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August
16
-- The UN in Sudan is too slow to complain and too
fast to celebrate. On August 16, after refusing to confirm to Inner
City Press at the noon briefing that UN officials in West Darfur are
being expelled, the UN Spokesperson's Office put out an unequivocal
statement that “the Secretary-General appreciates the restoration
today of humanitarian access to Kalma Camp.”
Inner
City
Press'
sources
in South Darfur told it that access had not, in fact, been
restored. Even the UN had to acknowledge it, putting out a correction
at 3:25 pm that “the Secretary-General appreciates the restoration
today of some humanitarian access to Kalma Camp.”
Nearly
immediately,
Inner
City
Press wrote to the two top officials working
in the Spokesperson's Office on Monday, asking
“In
light of the revision of today's statement on Darfur to include
“some” in “restoration of some humanitarian access,” please
describe as specifically as possible what types of humanitarian
access have NOT yet been restored. On deadline. Thanks.”
Despite
the
statement
“on
deadline,” and the UN's own mistake, three hours
later no response was provided. A report from Sudan quoted an OCHA
spokesperson whose contact information is not online that “it was
mostly an assessment mission.”
Another
UN
spokesman
in
Sudan confirmed on Monday what the UN in New York would
not, that "The heads of the UNHCR (U.N. refugee agency) and FAO
(Food and Agriculture) agencies in West Darfur as well as the head of
UNHCR agency in Zalengei have been asked to leave.”
UN's Ban and Al Bashir, thanks for access to Kalma:
correction not shown
At Monday's
noon
briefing
in
New York, according to the UN's own transcript:
Inner
City
Press:
I
wanted to ask a couple of questions about Sudan. One
is: can you confirm the reports that in West Darfur, the head of FAO
[Food and Agriculture Organization], two people from UNHCR [United
Nations refugee agency] and two Red Cross people have been expelled
by the Government? Particularly as to the UN officials, is that
something you can confirm? And also as to the two peacekeepers, a
Jordanian newspaper has said that those who had taken the
peacekeepers have made demands about some reforms for UNAMID to make. I
wonder if the UN has any idea whether these are
Government-affiliated kidnappers. And finally, whatever happened on
the pilot investigation, the Russian pilot that was taken in Darfur?
Did they ever find out who was behind that? Was it the
Government-affiliated Janjaweed or other rebels?
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson:
Well,
first of all, on the question of the
various abductions: on the Russian pilot issue, I don’t have
anything further to say. On the issue of the two people that were
abducted over the weekend from UNAMID, we did put a press release
from UNAMID over the weekend mentioning that abduction, but we do not
have any further comment or any details at this time. We are, of
course, working for their safe release and wouldn’t have any
comment to make on that.
As
for
the
situation
at Kalma camp of the various agencies, we have seen
the preliminary reports of these developments, and we are awaiting
further clarification from the Government of Sudan.
Inner
City
Press:
It
seems like a whole other region; these expulsions are
the head of FAO for all of West Darfur, and El Geneina and in
Zalingei. I’m not trying to be… I’m just saying that it seems
like the standoff between UNAMID and local officials in Darfur seems
to be spreading from South Darfur to West Darfur. I just wonder what
the plan to deal with this is.
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson:
On
the question of West Darfur, our
understanding is that the statements were related to security matters
in West Darfur State. However, expulsion orders have not been
officially issued. Discussions are ongoing between the UN and the
Government in Khartoum. The International Committee of the Red Cross
(ICRC) has requested that it will handle these developments on its
own behalf, which the UN will respect...
Inner
City
Press:
I’m
sorry, there’s just one more on this. There’s
a story about these West Darfur expulsions, says that the head of FAO
for West Darfur was asked to leave because he had forwarded a
petition against hunger, “1billionhungry.org”, and authorities
said he did not obtain approval for it. So I’m wondering, you said
it was a security situation, but is there any indication… that’s
why I’m saying it seems like the Government is cracking down. Are
UN officials permitted to forward things like this
“1billionhungry.org” petition to stop hunger without governmental
authority, or do they seek approval?
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson:
Well,
I’m not really aware that this is a
central issue. Like I said, discussions are ongoing between the UN
and the Government in Khartoum, and we’ll see what the results of
that are.
But
at the same
time, Abdallah al-Fadil, head of UNAMID in West Darfur, was quoted
that "The heads of the UNHCR and FAO agencies in West Darfur as
well as the head of UNHCR agency in Zalengei have been asked to
leave.” So why did the UN in New York says that “expulsion orders
have not been officially issued” and that all humanitarian access
to the Kalma Camp had been restored?
The
UN in Sudan is
too slow to complain and too fast to celebrate. And this puts
civilians at risk. Watch this site.
, 
