Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Lawsuit Against Fox By Majed Khalil for Dobbs Reporting Sidney Powell Charge Lives On

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell book
BBC - Honduras - CIA Trial book - NY Mag

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 27 – Majed Khalil sued Fox News for defamation after "Lou Dobbs displayed a graphic with the title 'Four Names You Need to Know According to Sidney Powell,' which included Khalil ' s name... accusing Khalil , along with three other individuals, of having "designed and developed the Smartmatic and Dominion programs and machines that include a controller module that allows people to log in and manipulate the vote even as it's happening."   

  Fox moved to dismiss, and on September 26, 2022 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Louis L. Stanton ruled, denying Fox' motion to dismiss.    Judge Stanton runs through the applicable New York law, and significantly notes that Khalil was not even a limited public figure: "Dobbs ' own statements during his show and tweets confirm that Khalil is not a public figure . When introducing Khalil to his audience, Dobbs tweeted that Khalil ' s name was one that "[people] need to get familiar with. " Compl. at 88 (alteration in original).

"Neither can Khalil be considered a limited public figure. A limited public figure is one who "voluntarily injects himself or is drawn into a particular public controversy and thereby becomes a public figure for a limited range of issues ." BYD Co. Ltd . v . VICE Media LLC, 531 F . Supp. 3d 810 , 819 (S . D. N. Y. 2021) , aff ' d , No. 21-1097, 2022 WL 598973 (2d Cir. Mar. 1 , 2022) . In the Second Circuit , in order to hold the plaintiff to be a limited- purpose public figure "a defendant must show the plaintiff has : (1) successfully invited public attention to his  - 21 -  views in an effort to influence others prior to the incident that is the subject of litigation ; (2) voluntarily injected himself into a public controversy related to the subject of the litigation; (3) assumed a position of prominence in the public controversy ; and (4) maintained regular and continuing access to the media. " Lerman v. Flynt Distrib . Co. , 745 F . 2d 123 , 136-37 (2d Cir . 1984) ; Biro , 963 F . Supp . 2d at 270 . Khalil did not draw public attention to his views to influence others regarding the election of 2020 nor insert himself into a public controversy related to the defamatory statements against him . He only became involved in the conversation because of the statements by Dobbs and Powell . He has not maintained regular and continual access to the media. He is not a limited public figure .


"Defendants repeatedly maintained their claims about Khalil long after Powell ' s election fraud theories were challenged . Numerous reports that declared the falsity of the claims against Dominion and Smartmatic and rejected Powell as an accurate source of information gave Defendants reasons to doubt Powell ' s veracity and the accuracy of her reports .

While the complaint does not allege that the Khalil himself informed Defendants of the falsity of the claims against him, both Smartmatic and Dominion did so . Falsity of the claims against both companies would necessitate falsity of the claims against Plaintiff. Plaintiffs have alleged enough facts in the complaint to survive a motion to dismiss and obtain discovery."

 Inner City Press will continue to follow the case(s).

 The case is Majed Khalil v. Fox Corporation, et al., 21-cv-10248 (Stanton) 

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com