Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



McHenry Sued Fox News and Tyrus After Frozen Out Of Watters World

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 25 – In late 2019 Brittany McHenry filed a sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit against Fox New, Fox Corporation, George Murdoch a/k/a Tyrus and the others.   On September 25 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Paul A. Engelmayer held an oral argument on a partial motion to dismiss. Inner City Press live tweeted it, here:

Fox's lawyer points back to a time it was called "21st Century Fox." Judge Engelmayer: When I grew up, it was 20th Century Fox... Which I guess is better than 19th Century Fox.  Fox Corp is moving to get out of the case, leaving Fox News in (while disputing facts)

Fox's lawyer: She doesn't allege details of how she was hired, does not bring in 21CF.. Judge Engelmayer: Got it. Let me ask you about Monica Mekeel, listed as SVP for both Fox News *and* Fox Corp. Fox's lawyer: That's not enough to plead single employer.

Judge Engelmayer: Was she wearing both hats? Fox's lawyer: It's not pled clearly enough. And Ms. Mekeel wasn't made aware of the alleged harassment early enough. Judge Engelmayer: If the behavior of Mister [George] Murdoch is not attributable to either Fox...

Fox's lawyer: She hasn't alleged anything specific about John Finley... And saying that Mekeel asked her what she'd done to trigger this from Mr. Murdoch is not enough under the applicable law. Inner City Press

Judge Engelmayer asks about the Amended Complaint's statement that "Ms. McHenry used to regularly appear on Fox News Channel's 'Watters' World,' but has not been booked since her complaint (despite communications from bookers that they wanted her to appear)."

Fox's lawyer: There are a lot of people who work on these shows. Judge Engelmayer: But Jen Rauchet is the executive producer... Let's walk about Ms. Mekeel. Doesn't she own this problem, such as it is? Didn't she have an affirmative duty? And Ms McHenry got iced

Fox's lawyer: the investigation was taken away from Mekeel, to an outside investigator, as Ms. McHenry's request.  [Argument by Kristina Yost of Jones Day for Fox is over. Now Thomas Clare for George Murdoch / Tyrus - he says, Tyrus was NOT her employer

Tyrus' lawyer: They were co-hosts, co-workers. Judge Engelmayer, quoting from the complaint: But he said, Your picture looks so good, I could knock it up. And he grabbed her hand in Times Square. Tyrus' lawyer: That doesn't show it was unwanted.

As the argument proceeds, this from the Amended Complaint at Para 74: "On November 5, 2018, Mr. Murdoch texted Ms. McHenry, 'I'll show you what it means to be bad Brittany Mc Henry // D*ck pic coming in 5 sec!!!'"

Judge Engelmayer: Doesn't this cross the line?   DP alert: Judge Engelmayer just said, without the asterisk, "Di*k pic," asks about "You'll need those legs to escape from me to Montana" - doesn't that imply no consent? Tyrus' lawyer: There's not a lot I can say. Judge Engelmayer: We'll see where the case goes.

Now Ms McHenry's lawyer is up. Judge Engelmayer asks him how it is possibly retaliatory to ask to see all the text messages. "What have you done to provoke Mr. Murdoch"- are you saying that is retaliation? McHenry's lawyer: It's victim-blaming. It's discriminatory

Judge Engelmayer: But how can you claim Ms. Mekeel aided and abetted harassment, and not just retaliation? McHenry's lawyer: She did nothing to stop it.  Judge Engelmayer: What about Finley? It's just a cameo appearance. McHenry's lawyer: He was the VP...

Judge Engelmayer, to McHenry's lawyer: Why did you include Fox Corp and not just Fox News? A: You never know. Judge Engelmayer: That's not the pleading standard. And why do you argument that the new amendment applies retroactively? A: I don't have cases on that.

This McHenry v. Fox argument is over. Judge Engelmayer: I'm taking it under submission. I wish you all well, and I know I will be seeing you down the road. We are adjourned.

The case is McHenry v. Fox News Networks, LLC et al., 19-cv-11294 (Engelmayer)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com