Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



MLB Pitch Tracking Was Sued For Source Code Now Case Transferred With Rule 11 Motion

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, May 26 – Sportvision Inc. sued Major League Baseball Advance Media in 2018, for allegedly stealing its technology.

Since then, 150 docket entries and two interested parties: Hawk-Eye Innovations North America and TrackMan, Inc. 

   On November 25 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman held a four-hour discovery proceeding. Inner City Press covered it.

    There was talk about seeking information from Denmark under the Hague Convention. There were questions about how a pitch is tracked, from hand to catcher's glove or bat.  

 Finally representing MLB Advanced Media LP Allyson Julien of Goldman Ismael in Chicago said it was up to the plaintiffs to say what their trade secrets are, not to poke around in MLB's documents to find things and "reverse engineer" them. 

 Judge Freeman said she would now go through the docket ruling on outstanding motions. Much of the docket was sealed -- and still is.

Jump cut to May 26, 2022 - the case has been transferred to new Magistrate Judge Valerie Figuerdo. She told they parties she is reviewing the still pending motions, including one for Rule 11 sanctions. That is by MLB, insisting that did not have any obligation to continue the operation of PITCHf/x after 2016. She said that argument will be in person.

The case is Sportvision, Inc et al v. MLB Advanced Media L.P., 18-cv-3025 (Gardephe / Figuerdo)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com