France is Asked about Evictions in Calais and Chad, UN Cuts Off
Questions, Jumps for Kouchner
Disputes One Hour Kabul Delay, Taliban Critique Ignored by UN
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, November 5, updated -- After five UN staff were killed in a
guest house, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that it had take an
hour for the Afghan police and international ISAF forces to respond.
On November 4, Afghanistan's Ambassador to the UN told Inner City
Press that his government disagrees -- the time lapse given is four
minutes -- and that he had written a letter to Mr. Ban to this
Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesperson Michele Montas if the
Secretary General still has his same initial position on how long it
took. Video here,
from Minute 16:34. We "have the same position," Ms. Montas said, adding
that that UN is "still investigating... the first task was to
ensure the security of those left behind." But if the truth
couldn't be known until later, why did the UN say it took an hour to
UN's Ban and Karzai and Afghan forces, 1 hour delay
asked to respond to the critique, by the Taliban but others as well,
that the UN took sides in Afghanistan, seeking to see Hamid Karzai
stay in power. "I am not going to comment on what the Taliban
are saying," Montas replied. Video here,
from Minute 37:50.
But is that
the best approach? As
one wag said after the briefing, the UN only responds to Taliban
actions -- by
removing 600 staff -- but not to Taliban comments. And on the same day
on the Congo, Ms. Montas said that the UN does not comment on
statements by governments, click here
of November 5 -- the UN added to its
transcript its position that no
protest from the Afghans has been registered, or at least, no letter
received. But see below. First, the transcript:
City Press: The Minister of Interior in Afghanistan has taken issue
with the Secretary-General saying that it took an hour for the Afghan
police to arrive. Yesterday, the Afghan Ambassador told me he has
written a letter to the Secretary-General protesting that comment.
What’s the UN’s current position on how long it took the Afghan
police to respond?
Montas: We have the same position. They are still trying to
investigate what happened. I don’t have the final results of that
investigation, our own investigation of what happened. The most
evident thing for us to do was first to ensure the security of those
left behind. But this is a question that is still being [inaudible].
City Press: Can you confirm the receipt of the letter from the Afghan
No, I can’t, I will try to find out for you when it was received,
but at this point I don’t have any information.
Spokesperson later added that the letter has not been received.]
see, reproduced here in full given the circumstances:
1, 2009 Sunday
quickly respond to UN guesthouse attack: MoI
NATIONWIDE INTERNATIONAL NEWS
Muhammad Jawad Sharifzada
1, 2009 - 18:13
(PAN): The Ministry of Interior (MoI) on Sunday rejected the reports
that police were slow to respond to Wednesday's terrorist attack on a
UN guesthouse in Shahr-i-Naw downtown.
United Nations on Friday demanded to know why it took an hour for
Afghan police and NATO troops to respond to the Taliban attack on the
guest house filled with UN staff.
militants laced with guns and suicide vests stormed the UN residence
in the 10th police district of the capital city around dawn, sparking
a fierce gun-battle with UN security officers for at least an hour
before NATO troops and Afghan police showed up.
assault killed six foreign UN employees and at least two Afghan
guards. The three attackers also were killed.
have accepted responsibility for the attack that left nine UN
spokesman for the ministry Zamray Bashari said UN chief Ban Ki Moon
had received repots in which it was mentioned that police were
arrived an hour late at the site.
said the reports were inaccurate. "Police arrived four minutes
after the first shoot and started rescue operations," added the
claimed the police response was very quick and showed bravery.
reports will have a bad impact on the police morale," he said.
said a joint commission of UN representatives and the ministry will
investigate the incident and will send an accurate report to the UN
added there were 1000 police in Kabul responsible for security of UN
* * *
Af-Pak Contradictions, on Threat Levels and No
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, November 2 -- As in Kabul UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
assured Hamid Karzai that UN staff will stay in Afghanistan, the UN
announced that it is pulling its international staff out of Northwest
Pakistan, declaring the area at the UN's "Phase IV"
security threat level. Is it safer in Afghanistan, where five UN
staff as well as at least two others were killed last week before the
second round of voting was canceled?
asked UN spokesperson Michele Montas, who declined to provide the
UN's threat level for Afghanistan. The UN press office in New York
routinely refuses to discuss issues it deems about security. Why then
did the UN in Pakistan, in a press release, declare the rise to Phase
release, by Isharat Rizvi of UNIC Islamabad, says that Mr. Ban "has
declared Phase IV (Emergency Operations) in NWFP and FATA." When Inner
City Press asked about it, Ms. Montas replied, "That should not have
happened." Video here,
from Minute 17:27.
But again, why
not? The UN has been criticized in Algeria for giving in to the
government's desire that the threat level be kept low, in the run-up
to the bombing of the UN in Algiers. So does the UN withhold its
threat assessment levels to placate governments? The U.S. State
Department, for example, issues public travel advisories for certain
countries. But the UN is "owned" by its member states. Did
Pakistan complain about the public raising to Phase IV?
also asked, for the second time, if the UN had contacted the third
place finisher in the first round of Afghan elections.
UN's Ban and Eide on tarmac in Kabul, threat
level and Bashardost not
October 22, Inner City Press asked
UN Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe
City Press: the number three candidate in Afghanistan, I know you’ve
said we may get this hook up, so I wanted to ask you this now. The
candidate who came in number three, Mr. Bashardost, has said that he
may tell those who voted for him -- 10 per cent of the voters -- to
boycott the second round due to continuing concerns of fraud. I
wanted to know, in all this, in the UN’s engagement both with
Abdullah Abdullah and President Karzai, is the UN speaking to this
number three candidate and what do they make of his critique of the
second round in advance?
Spokesperson Okabe: I’m sure that the UN is supporting all efforts
by the Afghan authorities in ensuring that a successful second round
round has been canceled, after Abdullah Abdullah withdrew, and the UN
apparently never contacted the number three candidate, Ramazan
Bashardost. Inner City Press asked Ms. Montas on November 2; she
replied that the decision to cancel was up to the Independent
Electoral Commission, which most see as dominated by Hamid Karzai.
even before the
IEC announced its decision, the UN's Kai
Eide called for a "timely"
conclusion. Inner City Press asked Ms. Montas to respond to those
see Eide's comment as indicating a preference, shared by the U.S.,
that the second round be canceled, not least for security of their
people. No, Ms Montas seemed to claim. The UN had no preference.
from Minute 17:27. Watch this site.
* * *
Fraud Throws Afghan Poll Into Chaos, UN Spins "Legal and
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, November 1 -- In Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai's main
challenger Abdullah Abdullah has followed through on his threat to
withdraw from the fraud triggered run off election set for November
7. The decision followed the Karzai
dominated Independent Elections
Commission announcing it would open even more phantom polling
stations for the second round, virtually ensuring similar or
did the UN's
top envoy in Kabul Kai
Eide have to say? "The next step must be
to bring this electoral process to a conclusion in a legal and timely
this mean? Cancel the second
round, which was
required by fraud for Karzai, and simply deem Karzai the winner by
default? Hold a phantom run off, Karzai against no one? Recontact
the third place finisher? On this, Inner City Press asked Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson Michele Montas who in the UN
system was in touch with him. An answer was promised by never given.
And now it appears too late.
appearance of chaos in Afghanistan, and in the UN's policy, on
Mission's website, Kai Eide is sitting pretty.
Eide in Council, for in repose see here
* * *
UN, Ban Asks $86 Million for Security, No Answers on Budget in Kabul's
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 30 -- In the wake of the killing of five UN staff
members in Kabul, in New York Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Friday
told the General Assembly he will ask for at least $86 million on top
of the budget he presented earlier this week. The requests include a
new $25 million emergency fund for security, and $50 million for a
second Access Control Project -- which it is not clear would have
covered the attacked Kabul guest house or facilities like it.
remarks asked for "expanded authority to undertake new financial
commitments in time of crisis. The current level of authority -- $1
million -- is simply not enough."
Inner City Press asked whether Ban would be funding his new three
person investigation panel for Guinea from a $8 million fund for
"unforeseen" expenses, Ban's spokesperson Michele Montas
said she didn't know. A UN budget official said that the Secretary
General can use this fund and simply report on its use at year's end.
Inner City Press has asked for previous reports.
press time in Afghanistan, Karzai's main rival Abdullah Abdullah is
reportedly prepared to announce a boycott of the second round. Inner
City Press has asked Ms. Montas, without answer, if the UN was in touch
with the candidate -- not Ashraf Ghani -- who came in third. Would his
name now be entered in the run off?
UN's Ban and widows, budget proposals not shown
what was billed
a a "town hall" meeting with UN staff about the killing of
their colleagues, Ban and the two other speakers, Ann Veneman of
UNICEF and the elusive Helen Clark of UNDP, did not take any
questions from staff.
Afterwards, some staff stopped and told Inner
City Press the budget request smacked of opportunism. One argued that
the deaths in Algiers and now Kabul were more the product of UN staff
being put in places their shouldn't be, rather than a lack of money.
Algiers, a UN
security official has recommended beefing up security and raising the
threat level, but the UN didn't, in deference to the government. In
Kabul, UN staff ere in a guest house, to which ISAF didn't respond
for an hour.
be needed, but there are not sufficient if UN leadership does not
have the will, including the willingness to stand up to host
countries, to protect its staff. But as with the USA Patriot Act, who
will dare to vote against these requests, in the wake of a bombing?
While to some this skepticism seems harsh, it is significant - and
newsworthy - that is circulating in the UN, and at a not-low level. One
wonders when the Secretariat will come forward with the specifics of
its DSS budget, particularly the items aluded to on Friday, and if it
will forthrightly ties or compare the requests to what happened
at the Kabul guesthouse, or Algiers before that. Watch
* * *
Ban To Ask For Money for Afghan Security, of PMCs and Phantom Polling
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 29 -- In the aftermath of the Taliban's attack on UN
staff in Kabul, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon briefing the Security
Council and the Press about a plan to allocate and spend more money
on security. Mr. Ban arranged with General Assembly President Ali
Treki to brief the Assembly on October 30. His Office said that a
dollar figure will be released then and only then.
Thursday, Ban's Spokesperson declined to respond to an accusation by
the developing countries in the Group of 77 that Ban has been making
budget moves impermissibly without General Assembly approval. Inner
City Press asked about G-77 testimony that morning in the Fifth
(Budget) Committee, but Spokesperson Michele Montas said no response
would be given, she "will not intervene in this." Video here,
from Minute 13:48.
subsequently arranged General Assembly appearance by Ban imply a
recognition that Assembly approval must be sought and obtained? Inner
City Press on Thursday asked the spokesman for President Ali Treki if
it is Mr. Treki's view that Ban needs General Assembly approval, and
has been told an answer will be given. Video here,
from Minute 20:37.
Press after the Council, Ban was asked if the increased security
might include private military contractors. To many of the assembly
reporters, Ban appeared to say yes, and then to smile when the name
"Blackwater" was shouted. There are issues with the UN
using mercenaries -- as Inner City Press was the first to
UN used them in Iraq, but borrowed them from the UK and left it on
the UK's budget, not the UN's.
UN's Ban on October 28, financial proposal to GA not shown
was also asked
for the UN's response to the announcement by the Hamid
Karzai-dominated Independent Elections Commission that it will open
155 more of the phantom polling stations that resulted in findings of
fraud in the first round.
While Ban has
said that polling stations
that cannot be monitored should not be opened, the IEC now
intends to increase the number of stations from 6167 to 6322, in an
atmosphere less secure and harder to monitor than before.
And if the second
round, too, is fraudulent, will there be a third round? Watch
* * *
Karzai's IEC Wants Phantom Polling, UN Will Support It and Its
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 27 -- After struggling to assert its relevance in
Afghanistan, the UN on October 26 said that it will play no role in
how the run-off election triggered by fraud in the first round will
be run. The spokesperson for Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that
decisions on which remote polling stations in Taliban controlled
areas to keep open, and who to fired, will be entirely up to the
so-called Independent Electoral Commission, who members are appointed
by Hamid Karzai.
appeared at odds with what Mr. Ban had said in response to Inner City
about closing the phantom polling stations which had
been criticized by the deputy Afghan envoy fired by Ban, Peter
Galbraith. Then, Ban said he and the UN favored keeping these
stations open, and that he had fired Galbraith for pushing to have
them closed. In a later interview with CNN, Ban seemed to veer and
say that some of them should be closed. Now, his spokesperson Michele
Montas says it is entirely up to Karzai's ICC. From the October
City Press: in Afghanistan, there’s this call by Abdullah Abdullah
that the head of the IEC should be, be removed for bias, and that 500
polling stations, which is similar to the number that Mr. Galbraith
had given, should not be opened in the second round. What’s, I
mean, I know that, that at the stakeout, the Secretary-General had
said as many should be open as possible to keep people voting, and
then I think that he may have said something differently later on
CNN. But what’s the current thinking of the Secretary-General on
these 500 stations or whatever number he, he is looking…
Montas: As you know, the decision is not ours. It is the decision
of the electoral, existing electoral Afghan commissions. We are not
hiring or firing any staff. However, we are… we were told that we
have received assurances from the independent election commission
that you know, they will not reopen places where fraud took place. So
that’s all really we know.
UN's Ban, spokesperson and DPKO chief, phantom
polling stations not shown
City Press: And does the UN have any idea what, you know, either what
standard is going to be applied or how many polling stations that
Montas: Well, we don’t have the exact number, but we can tell you
that they want to make sure that what happened in the first round
will not happen again, or that at least if there is any fraud, there
are specific ways of dealing with that fraud. But we are trying to
keep as many places open, as the Secretary-General said. However,
you know, if the decision of the Independent Electoral Commission…
to open a number of those polling places, we’ll try to support that
the UN "try to support" polling stations in areas entirely
controlled by the Taliban? By giving member states' money to the
Karzai controlled IEC? Watch this site.
Plays Ukraine, Zim and Pakistan As "Technical" Questions,
Pushes Tax Hikes in Serbia
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 22 -- Are the International Monetary Fund's
negotiations with countries about the level of taxes and salaries for
public sector employees, the pricing of electricity and the
privatization of social services political, or merely "economic
and technical"? The questions arose Thursday in connection with
Ukraine, Zimbabwe and Pakistan, among others, in the IMF's first
press briefing since its annual meeting in Turkey.
Caroline Atkinson fielded questions for half an hour, leaving
unanswered one submitted by Inner City Press about Serbia, where the IMF's
Paul Thompson has been quoted that "if the Serbian
delegation has a concrete pan for decreasing expenses, we will
support it, if not, they
will have to agree with us and think about
increasing taxes." Left unanswered: how is raising taxes merely
respond to Inner City Press' questions about Ukraine, Zimbabwe and
Pakistan. While a full transcript is available online here,
and video here,
in sum the Q & A went as follows:
City Press asked, In Ukraine, the opposition party is critical of the
IMF as funding the campaign of Tymoshenko. What is the IMF's response
to the opposition's criticism? Ms. Atkinson replied that IMF funds go
to the central bank, and that the IMF has a team on the ground in
Kiev for a third review.
not, it seems, saying that money from the IMF is being used by
Tymoshenko for advertisements or to pay poll workers, but rather "MP
and opposition government's finance minister, Mykola Azarov, said
this at a meeting with delegates of an IMF mission, 'We must say that
the program of cooperation with the IMF has turned out to be
ineffective, and nothing is left but to consider the IMF's
as politically motivated, as funding of one of the candidates running
for the presidency.'"
reporter asked a follow up question about Ukraine, wondering if with
the IMF mission on the ground, the upcoming election "is an
issue," Ms. Atkinson said the IMF does not comment while a
mission is in the field, negotiating a program, but that information
-- and one hopes some questions and answers -- will be provided once
the mission is completed
IMF points the way, in budgets... and politics?
City Press asked, "NGOs are critical of the IMF for, they say,
pushing Zimbabwe to privatize its social services system. Has the IMF
pushed for that, and how does it respond to the criticism?" Ms.
Aktinson, while saying she can get back to Inner City Press with more
information, argued that the IMF does not favor or disfavor
particular privatizations, but must be pushing to strengthen the
social service sector to help the poor.
ahead of civil society's consultative meeting with an IMF team under
Article IV of the Fund's Articles of Agreement, NANGO said
are opposed to some IMF polices such as privatization of basic social
services. We know it from the past that some IMF policies have worked
against people in this country. They have affected the social
services sector and their polices are anti-people and negative'...
[NANGO] said some of the IMF instigated polices which had brought
suffering to the people were the Economic Structural Adjustment
Programme (ESAP) and Zimbabwe Programme for Economic and Social
Transformation (ZIMPREST)." It's a pretty specific critique,
and we'll publish the IMF's response upon receipt.
Inner City Press' questions and article from August 2009, it asked
"in Pakistan, the IMF in August extended for a year the
country's time to eliminate electricity subsidies. Now, while the
says 2 price increases will be implemented, others say this is not
possible politically. What is the IMF's thinking on consumer power
pricing in Pakistan?"
replied that "as I believe you know, the issue of issue of
electric subsidy is typically done by the World Bank and Asian
Development Bank," that IMF gets involved due to the budget."we
will be having another review of the Pakistan program in early
November." We'll be there....
* * *
Food Speculation, UN's Expert Says Nothing's Being Done, S. Korean Land
Grabs from Madagascar to Sudan, Brazil on Ethanol
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 21 -- After many speeches at the UN about the need
to crack down on financial speculation in food, nothing has been
done, the UN's expert on the right to food told Inner City Press on
Olivier de Schutter, a Belgian law professor just back
from a visit to Brazil about, among other things, the loss of land
for food to ethanol, replied that "nothing is moving at the
inter-governmental level." This despite a statement by the G-20
in April favoring the regulation of hedge funds which present
systemic risk. The argument is that commodities index funds which
speculate in food present systemic risk to net food importing
countries. But nothing has been done.
about the monopolization of the seed industry, and made a slew of
recommendations for governments. The three top monopolizers --
Monsanto, Dupont and the Swiss-based Syngenta -- are all members of
the UN Global Compact, and claim to comply with human rights. De
Schutter pointed out the antitrust law is directed as national and
not global or subnational markets. It is all very heady but one
wonders what effect it has.
one of de Schutter's claims to impact. He spoke glowingly of
President Lula, saying that Brazil has said that only 19% of land can
be used for sugar cane for ethanol, and has committed to monitor
labor rights. But what about, for example, Indonesia and Malaysia?
De Schutter, action on food speculation not shown
Schutter's briefing, Inner City Press asked his staffer for an update
on the proposed land grab in Madagascar by South Korea based Daewoo,
which was reputed after the coup in that country. De Schutter had
been scheduled to visit, but it was put off by the coup. The same
thing happened in Honduras. So perhaps De Schutter does have an
effect after all, mused one wag.
immediately after De Schutter's briefing, the UN's Haile Menkerios
was scheduled to speak to the Press about Madagascar. While the UN
usually compartmentalizes its work such that a rapporteur looks at
land grabs, while the Secretariat remains on "political affairs"
narrowly defined, this land grab played a role in the change of
government. Now it's said the South Korean deal is being pursued from
India, while South Korea appears to have moved on to 690,000 hectares
in Sudan. Watch this site.
* * *
Indigenous Expert Stymied in Russia, Does Not Engage in Myanmar, Will
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 19 -- Russia blocked the UN's expert on the rights
of indigenous people from visiting the site slated
for the Evenki dam
in Krasnoyarsk Territory, it emerged at the UN on Monday.
Press asked James Anaya, the UN's Special Rapporteur on the situation
of human rights and fundamental freedom of indigenous people, if he
had in fact been allowed to visit the site. The Russian
quoted Igor Kurtushin, deputy head of the territorial
administration’s department for external relations that "it
would not be easy to visit the Evenki sites due to peculiar weather
asked if Anaya had visit the contested
site, from which indigenous people would be evicted. No, he said,
in the agenda we were able to negotiate. Video here,
this, in fact,
due to the weather, Inner City Press followed up. "The weather
was good was I was there," Anaya answered, describing two
flights in Krasnoyarsk and an outdoor meal of reindeer parts. Video here,
from Minute 36:29.
contrasted to Panama, where the government allowed Anaya to visit the
site of a proposed dam. When Inner City Press asked about Ecuador and
conflicts there, Anaya said he is going in December, invited by the
seems too accommodating of governments. When Inner City Press asked
about Canada's refusal to sign on to the Declaration of the Rights of
Indigenous People, Anaya said Canada is moving in the right
direction, that he doesn't criticize countries if there is the
"possibility" of movement.
Inner City Press asked about the position of Botswana that nearly all
people there are indigenous, Anaya responded that he hadn't seen a
need to contest this position during his recent visit there. Given
that the position almost derailed the Declaration, it seems strange
to some to be so accommodative of it now.
Reindeer, UN's Anaya and Russia permit to visit not shown
it is to and
within the UN system that Anaya is most accommodative. Inner City
Press asked about the UN's REDD program, which was protested earlier
this month. Anaya said that the UN agencies want to address
indigenous issues. When Inner City Press asked about indigenous
people in Myanmar, Anaya responded that since there is another
rapporteur on Myanmar, he does not engage in Myanmar. Video here,
from Minute 49:22.
deference is not required: for example, the UN's expert on children
and armed conflict engages with Myanmar, rather than deferring.
Particularly given the issues that have arisen about the UN's special
rapporteur on Myanmar, for Anaya to say he'll do nothing in or about
the country ill-served indigenous people. Watch this site.
* * *
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 19 -- In his first media availability at the UN, new
French Ambassador Gerard Araud marked the International Day for the
Eradication of Poverty with a press conference on October 19.
City Press asked Ambassador Araud about his country's eviction of
immigrants from a camp near Calais last month, about the drowning of
residents of the Comoros trying to get to the French island of
Mayotte, and about mass
evictions in the capital of Chad, where the Idriss Deby government
receives substantial French support. Video here,
from Minute 25:32.
said immigration is an issues throughout the developed world, quickly
equating the drowning of those seeking to get to Mayotte with deaths
of African in the Mediterranean.
He said that
of the camp was because immigration should be restricted to that
which is legal, so that Europeans don't "become violent."
He said it was fair to be critical, he has seen such criticism of
U.S. policies as well, but these countries are democracies.
"answering about Chad is the easiest," and then proceeded
to say that his Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, the moment he got
the post, took in the lead is setting up peacekeeping mission in
Eastern Chad, first through the European Union and then the UN.
question was cut off by the UN's moderator, Rachel Mayanja. She said,
"before we proceed... I am surprised none of you want to take
advantage" of the boy on the panel, from Dominica, to "expose
his journey." Video here,
from Minute 31:55. But she had begun
by saying that the youth would be accompanied by a chaperrone from
ChildFund Caribbean, who was not on the podium.
compliant correspondent dutifully asked the boy about photography --
ChildFund saved him from being a criminal, he equally dutifully said
-- Inner City Press asked Ambassador Araud about the evictions done
by French ally Idriss Deby, did he have any answer? He shook his head
no. And the press conference was over. Video here,
from Minute 34:49.
the French journalists opined that Ms. Mayanja may have been trying
to protect or please France, a Permanent Five member of the Security
Council, by shifting from questions about France's record to what she
wanted journalists to ask and write about. This has become more
prevalent at the UN.
France's Gerard Araud at the UN on Monday,
Chad eviction answers not shown
note that Ms.
Mayanja's cutting off of questions cannot necessarily be ascribed to
Araud. The UN may offer protection where none is even requested. If
Ms. Mayanja wanted to play up the boy's story, why have him appear at
the French Ambassador's first press conference?
told Inner City Press that Bernard Kouchner called Ban Ki-moon
recently and told him the UN should launch an investigation of the
recent killing of some 150 protesters in Guinea Conakry. Ban did just
that; when Inner City Press asked, his spokesman said that it was at
the request of ECOWAS. But why didn't the UN launch any inquiry into
the tens of thousands of civilians killed in Sri Lanka earlier this
as the UN on
Monday sought to limit questions to the right kind of poverty, it
will only investigate the killings of the right victims: it all
depends on who the perpetrator is, and who provides protection.
also on the Chad evictions, Inner City Press asked this question last
week to Habitat's New York representative, and for an update on what
if anything Habitat did to follow up on supposed commitments by
Angola not to continue evictions. Video here.
A response was promised, but has
not been received. What was that again, about eradicating poverty?
* * *
UN, Iran's Mottaki Says Protesters Are Dealt With, Nuclear Sites All
Matthew Russell Lee
NATIONS, October 1 -- In Iran "there are some people, a limited
number of people, who look for trouble and want to create unreal,"
Iranian foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki told the Press on
Thursday. "It is very clear how they should be dealt with."
from Minute 31:55.
session at the UN in New York, nearly all of which dealt with nuclear
issues, Inner City Press asked Mottaki about a story of
torture, rape and exile, which Inner City Press heard from Ebrahim
Sharifi by cell phone on September 21. Sharifi states that he
the non violent street protests then was picked up, blindfolded and
held for a week.
asked Mottaki if he acknowledged the veracity of any such charges, if
people can file complaints in Iran and what he thinks of the call for
a UN General Assembly special envoy to Iran on human rights issues.
from Minute 25:43, Mottaki's
reponse here from Minute
five minute answer became with calling the June elections "the
most glorious presidential elections in the history of the Islamic
Republic of Iran." Mottaki claimed the skeptics, once they
received an explanation, were convinced. This left a few trouble
makers -- "it is very clear how they should be dealt with."
UN's Ban, Ahmadinejad, Motakki and Zarif, pre election violence
Iran has vibrant NGOs, which rather than complain in Geneva to the
Human Rights Council come to the UN in New York to participate in
workshops about the rights on women.
program, Mottaki said that other than Qom, there are no other sites
not reported to the IAEA. The press conference ended with a report
for a newspaper in Israel calling for the floor, without receiving
it. He was told by the UN's spokesperson that the UN is an
"inter-governmental body... we cannot do anything about what
member states do." Apparently not.
before traveling to DC, wiled away the evening of September 29 at
Indonesia's Independence Day celebration in the UN Delegates' Dining
Room. There were satays, rice and noodles. One attending, chewing,
snarked that at such receptions, the quality of the food is in inverse
proportion to the amount of democracy in the hosting nation.
Inner City Press has previously written about, and
kebab diplomacy, click here for that. Seven thousand years of
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]