Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



After Woman Charged With Threats to NYC NGO Gets Time Served Restitution Ridiculed

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell book

SDNY COURTHOUSE, March 2 – Back on March 12, 2019 the US Department of Justice announced that "Kim Anh Vo, a.k.a. “F@ng,” a.k.a. “SyxxZMC,” a.k.a. “Zozo,” a.k.a. “Miss.Bones,” a.k.a. “Sage Pi,” a.k.a. “Kitty Lee,” was arrested this morning in Hephzibah, Georgia.  Vo was charged by a criminal Complaint with conspiring to provide material support to the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham."

  The complaint cited "a photograph of Victim-l's chief executive officer and a former U.S . Ambassador ("Victim-1 ,CEO"), along with the words: "[Victim-1 CEO] we will  take [the Victim-1 Twitter Account] down Inshallah."

  Victim-1 was a NYC based NGO which, after Vo plead guilty, wanted $176,000 in restitution for cyber defense moves it said she had made them take.   

When U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Noami Reice Buchwald sentenced Vo on February 23, 2023 -- to time served, she was told by the AUSA that "the non-profit organization impacted by the conspiracy is seeking approximately $176,000 in restitution."  

Judge Buchwald said, "Well, that's fine as far as it goes, but that's not supported by anything. So I hardly know if the number is right in and of itself, and whether it is also appropriate essentially to ask Ms. Vo to bear the entire cost of whatever defensive measures this organization took is sort of a separate question, I think, probably worth some briefing...you can't  answer that in an anodyne way? OK. Just skip it."

The case is US v. Vo, 19-cr-223 (Buchwald)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2023 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com