Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ Fortune 2023, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Use of Medical Marijuana on Release Opposed by SDNY US Attorney But Judge OKs It

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, April 4 – A woman from Michigan released to there on bond by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrates Court in February now seeks to modify the order so as to use medical marijuana while on supervision in Michigan. 

 The US Attorney's Office for the SDNY opposes it. The Federal Defenders cite orders by the District's Chief Judge and Judges Broderick, Furman, Abrams and Rakoff permitting the use of medical marijuana while on supervised release.

  Magistrate Judge Cott directed the US Attorney's Office to respond, and let the duty judge then resolve the matter in the Magistrates Court, which Inner City Press closely covers.

On April 4 the the Magistrate Judge of the week approved it: "Memo Endorsed re: [14] Letter motion in support of bail modification request as to Brandalene Horn (1)... Endorsement: The possession of marijuana is illegal under federal law, and there is no federal exception for medical marijuana.See Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 5, 27-28 (2005). Compliance with federal law is a mandatory condition of Defendant's bail. Nevertheless, Chief Judge Swain has persuasively explained that an appropriate set of conditions relating to the medical marijuana therapy can appropriately protect the public and the Defendant and facilitate effective supervision. United States v. Arizaga, No. 16 Cr. 89 (LTS), 2016 WL 7974826, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2016). In that case, she directed the Pretrial Services Department not to charge a violation of Defendant's release conditions based solely on New York state-approved medical marijuana use or a drug-testing result consistent with New York state-approved medical marijuana usage if certain conditions were met. See id. Other judges in this District and the EDNY have authorized the use of medical marijuana for defendants on supervision. (See ECF 10, Letter (citing cases).) Counsel for Ms. Horn has described the salient features of the Michigan State medical marijuana program. (See ECF 14.). Ms. Horn has been approved for participation in that program, which approval required her to have a telehealth visit with a physician who subsequently completed a certification. The program is available only to individuals who suffer from certain eligible serious medical and/or mental health conditions. The nature of the Michigan medical marijuana program would permit appropriate conditions to protect the public and the Defendant and facilitate effective supervision. Arizaga, 2016 WL 7974836, at *3. Accordingly, PTS (wherever Defendant is being supervised) is directed not to charge a violation of Defendant's bail conditions solely based on her use of medical marijuana, if Defendant meets the following conditions: (1) providing PTS with proof of her certification by a registered Michigan practitioner as well as her registry ID card that allows her to receive medical marijuana in the State of Michigan; (2) purchasing an authorized form of medical marijuana from an approved vendor in Michigan; and (3) providing PTS with proof of her valid prescriptions, dispensary receipts, and amounts/weights/forms of marijuana purchased, as directed by PTS. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate ECF 14. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 4/4/2024)."  Watch this site.

 The case is US v. Horn, 24-mj-626 (Tarnofsky)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2024 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com