Among 16
Bronxites Indicted in Valentine Ave Drug
Case Marcus Is Denied Bail But Appeals
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
March 20– Angel
Villafane, previously
convicted of a felony, was
arrested for having a gun in
incidents starting at 97th
Street and Second Avenue then
110th Street and the FDR (long
barrel firearm)
On May 20,
2022 U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New
York Judge Victor
Marrero held a conference.
Inner City Press covered it,
the only media there.
Jump cut to March
6, 2024 - now it was grown to
a 16 defendant indictment: "As
alleged, day in and day out,
this crew distributed
fentanyl, heroin, and crack
along several blocks on
Valentine Avenue."
Inner City Press
went to arraignments including
that of Christopher Meadows,
who the prosecutor described
as an enforcer for the lead
named defendant (who was
detained on consent).
Based on
medical conditions named in
court but which Inner City
Press will voluntarily not
report, he was ordered bailed
on $50,000 bond to his
mother's residence in
Soundview by Magistrate Judge
Valerie Figueredo. On the day
of appeal, the US agreed to
release.
On March 15,
another co-defendant had a
bail hearing before Magistrate
Judge Stewart D. Aaron. Inner
City Press was there, here
OK - now at bail
hearing in Bronx Valentine Ave
16 case - 10 supporters of
detained defendant here.
Defense: My client could move
out of The Bronx, to his
mother's on Staten Island, or
to a suretor's in Orange
County. He's charged with
aiding & abetting the use
or brandishing of a firearm in
connection with narcotics
sales
AUSA: We are
appealing one order to
release: we agreed to release
Meadows ["The Enforcer," Inner
City Press live tweeted that
too]. Defense: My client
manages a musician, sells
clothing at clubs. He used to
be a porter at Tracy Towers
[in The Bronx]
AUSA: He
possessed a loaded weapon, and
sold fentanyl. He faces 360
months to life in prison. Four
cooperating witnesses will
testify against him, one of
them a rival. Another will
testify to selling him a gun.
AUSA: He
was arrested with a gun and
hollow point bullets, in a
bedroom shared with a two year
old autistic child. He is a
clear and present danger to
the community
Judge: I'm
focusing on danger to the
community. A gun was found at
your residence. I'm ordering
detention.
On March 20,
co-defendant Damel Marcus
asked for release on bail, in
Magistrates Court. Inner City
Press was there, thread
Defense: My
client was detained on consent
2 weeks ago. Now we are
applying for bail. We proposed
home detention in the home
where he was arrested - on
Third Avenue, some 25 blocks
away. His girlfriend works at
NYU Langone and makes $80,000.
His ex makes $30,000
Defense:
Another suretor would be his
aunt, working for the US Post
Office, makes $55,000. His
uncle is here, in the
wheelchair in the back. My
client is 48 years old, his
only conviction was at 18.
Judge: How many years did he
serve in prison? Defense: 17
years
Defense:
The only defendant detained in
this case is one charged with
having a gun in his home.
Others after appeal to Judges
Furman and Stein are out on
bond. Judge: The other
Judge Stein? The superior
judge Stein? AUSA: Of the 16,
14 are in custody. 2 are out
Judge: What about
Mr. Vargas? AUSA: We continue
to litigate his release.
Judge: Someone ordered him
released? AUSA: Yes, by
Magistrate Judge Cave. That
was affirmed by, as you said,
the other Judge Stein. But we
continue litigation before him
AUSA: I'd
like to think with the court
about the charges in the S-7
indictment. Judge: How
would you distinguish the two
released from this defendant?
AUSA: This crew was
hierarchical. Its two leaders,
sometimes in conflict, both
face mandatory life
AUSA: The
guideline range here is 360
months to life. His criminal
history is serious. He had a
youthful offender conviction,
which operates for all intents
and purposes as a conviction
here in the Federal system. It
was the theft of a car
AUSA: The
defendant did bench warrant in
that first case. Then he was
convicted for shooting someone
on the street, and killing
them. When he was finally
released, there was another
arrested for reckless
endangerment. Parole was
revoked.
AUSA: It's a
limited number of people who
have killed someone else on
the street. This defendant is
one of them. He met the leader
of the crew, who brought him
in from Brooklyn as a manager.
Six cooperating witnesses will
testify to the structure
AUSA: He
went on a cruise to the
Bahamas. But he has no other
identifiable lawful employment
or means. Pre Trial Services
does not know the underlying
facts. There will be multiple
witnesses to this defendant
using firearms on this block.
He asserted primacy
AUSA: There was a
shootout, multiple rounds.
Three witnesses will testify
as eye-witnesses. In
another incident, a member of
the crew perceived to be
taking profits was ambushed
and beaten with chains that
had been heated on a space
heater.
AUSA: People have
died from fentanyl in their
stash houses. The enforcer,
yes he was bailed - with the
consent of the government. And
the woman who was bailed, she
was not a manager - in fact,
she disassociated herself from
the crew in July of last year
AUSA: We
ask you to detain him.
Defense: I have quite a few
points to respond to. 3142(g)
requires you to consider the
weight of the evidence [Uncle
in wheelchair nods in assent]
Defense: For the
1st time we hear these
allegations, not taken to the
grand jury
Defense: The
youthful offender, yes the 2d
Circuit says it can be
considered here - but these
days it would have been a
juvenile delinquency
case... Judge: But then
manslaughter. Defense: He was
17 then. I haven't been able
to get the files from the
Bklyn court
AUSA: We
spoke to the DA's office - and
we got the records, predating
the regularization of reports.
More broadly speaking- Judge:
Before that - you said he was
the shooter. Why? AUSA: We
spoke with the DA's Office.
There was a trial in that
case.
Defense: So
they don't have the DA
records? Judge: He did 17
years in prison. Defense: An
ill-advised teenager got 17
years. Then motorcycle without
a license, a decade ago. In
this indictment, there's i
(possession) ii (brandishing)
and iii (discharge of a gun
Defense:
All we have here is ipsi dixit
-- AUSA: Counsel did not ask
for a proffer. I would have
been happy to give one.
Defense: That is incorrect. We
spoke on the day of the
arrest, I do not go into my
conversations with the
government under Rule 410
Defense:
Pre Trial has a score system -
and the charges are factored
in. This is a 49 year old who
lives with an employee of NYU
Langone - and he works off the
books at a tire place. That's
how they traveled to the
Caribbean. He would be 25
blocks away
Judge:
Thank you for your vigorous
argument. I am prepared to
rule. There are no conditions
I can impose that will assure
the safety of the community.
[Detention will continue]
But late in the
day, notice that the defense
has appealed to Part I. Watch
this site.
The case is US v.
Villafane, et al., 21-cr-93
(Marrero)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|