Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg NYLJ New Statesman, CJR, NY Mag, AJE, Georgia, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Death of Erika Zak after Botched Liver Ablation Triggers Trial against Sloan Kettering now Charge

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, April 10 – Erika Zak's battle against cancer and for a liver transplant was in the news until her death in 2019, and since.

  Now her husband's lawsuit against Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Doctor Constantinos Sofocleous have come to trial.

 On April 3, 2023 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Lorna G. Schofield was presiding over the trial. Inner City Press went and covered it.

 Plaintiff Scott Powers was on the witness stand, recounting their visits to New York leading up to the botched liver ablation procedure.

A plaintiff's side tech in the front row worked two laptops to display photos of Erika, Scott and their daughter, identified in court as Loie but called L.P. in the court papers.  

  For a time the courtroom was full; then the group of students went down to the 5th floor classroom in 40 Foley Square to talk about the case.

More including analysis on Substack here

 On April 5, defendant Constantinos Sofocleous was on the stand, speaking directly to the jurors in response to direct examination questions.

On April 6, the charge conference at which counsel for Sloan Kettering argued that there was no evidence of "who did the vacuuming" and what type of compensation should be able to be considered.

On April 10, the final witness, contesting under cross examination the duty to disclose all possibilities including that of doing nothing. He said patients come to Sloan Kettering for expert advice after getting diagnosis everywhere. Next would be the charge, then the two closings, Judge Schofield said.

  It is Powers v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center et al., 20-cv-2625 (Schofield)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2023 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com