Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

More: InnerCityPro

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



In Corrupt UN of Guterres UNESCO Executive Board Eyes DG Azoulay

By Matthew Russell Lee & sources, Exclusive

UN GATE, April 11UNESCO, like the whole UN system under Antonio Guterres is falling apart in corruption and fraud.

  Inner City Press has been reporting on serious malfeasance by the French Audrey Azoulay administration at UNESCO in Paris, almost as bad as Antonio Guterres' corruption in and of the UN in New York. A fish rots from the head.

However, our efforts to reveal the misdeeds progress. After years of undivided reign by the French Drama Queen Audrey Azoulay, the recent misstep by her management team in charge of finance sounded the death knell. The lawless dealing with the 2023 UNESCO deficit exposed by Inner City Press (here and here) led to the following crucial decision by member states at the recent session of the Executive Board:      

 “Item 4 Execution of the programme adopted by the General Conference: C/5 Implementation Report  (…)   5. Notes with serious concern that a total of $5,573,958 of commitments initially recorded under the 2022-2023 41 C/5 regular budget could not be covered by available regular budget resources and that it is therefore proposed, by the Secretariat as an exceptional measure, without  setting  a  precedent,  and  in  full  respect  of  all  relevant  financial  regulations to use other sources of funds as indicated in Table 6 of document 219 EX/4;  

  6. Recalls  that  41 C/5 Appropriation  Resolution  does  not  permit  commitments  by  the  Secretariat over a budget ceiling of $534,647,000, under the regular budget;     7. Accepts that the Secretariat, on an exceptional basis and without prejudice to the findings of the IOS and the external auditors, fulfils its legal financial commitments from available funding sources as proposed in Table 6 from document 219 EX/4 to avoid the defaulting of payments; 

   8. Therefore  allows,  on  an  exceptional  basis  and  without  prejudice  to  the  findings  of  the  IOS and the external auditors, the proposed transfer of $3,308,762 from the MCA Special Account to three other Special Accounts (Staff Cost Recovery Account, Field “FITOCA” Account,  and Special  Account  to  Accommodate  Residual  Balance  of  Commitments  under the 41 C/5) as indicated in the above-mentioned Table 6;   

 9. Takes note of the exceptional measure to establish a Special Account to Accommodate Residual  Balance  of  Commitments  under  the  41 C/5  and  approves  the  deviations  between  the  Standard  Financial  Regulations  of  Special  Accounts  and  the  Financial  Regulations of the Special Account to Accommodate Residual Balance of Commitments under the 41 C/5 contained in the Annex VIII to document 219 EX/4 as amended, except for 8.2;     10.Asks the  Director of  IOS  to  provide  at  the  220th  session  of  the  Executive  Board,  the  findings  and  recommendations  of  the  ongoing  IOS  performance  audit  on  budget  monitoring and controls;    

11.Invites the External Auditors, in the framework of the audit report of the consolidated financial  statements  for  2023,  to  provide  an  opinion  and  observations  regarding  the  respect  of  financial  Regulations  4.1  and  4.2  and  the  corresponding  appropriation  resolution of 41 C/5 and 42 C/5;      12. Further  invites  the  External  Auditors  to  express  an  opinion  on  the  liquidation  of  legal  contractual  obligations  related  to  2023  activities,  on  the  budget  controls  of  the  Organization  and  the  use  of  other  sources  of  funds  to  cover  commitments  initially  recorded under the 2022-2023 41 C/5 regular budget. (…)” (Full text available here)  

  This is the most salient and serious decision taken by member states questioning Audrey Azoulay's management since her election to head the agency in 2017. It speaks volumes. Using terms like " default of payment ", expressing "serious concern" and above all involving IOS and the external auditor in defining responsibilities is an unprecedented decision that shows how far UNESCO's mismanagement has gone under DG Azoulay and how much accountability is becoming a priority for member states. This decision clearly shows that trust has broken down between DG Azoulay and the member states. 

   Interventions during the Board meeting were also particularly strong, highlighting the administration's illicit effort to conceal the deficit, the conflict of interest in providing a solution, and the Azoulay administration's inability to manage the Agency properly in general.  

  Even more surprisingly, France's ambassador to UNESCO, Philippe Franc, did not defend the French DG as usual. This is a very clear signal that something is radically changing. The only action taken by the French was to call the British Foreign Office and ask that their ambassador be reminded that support for the Frenchwoman Azoulay is essential. Her Excellency the Ambassador followed instructions from her capital, but this did little to change the disastrous decision taken against the French DG.     Another signal given to member states was the physical absence of both the French Ambassador Franc and of the French DG Azoulay from the closing plenary session of the Executive Board. Very weird to have them both absent.

 Most countries had a legitimate reading of France's total abdication in UNESCO affairs. However, with a year still to run, it is to be hoped that DG Azoulay will resume her attendance at statutory meetings of the governing bodies, in accordance with her constitutional obligations, unless she decides to stop receiving her fat salary from the same member states she contemptuously sulks and shuns.

    We will have more on that. This is where UNESCO stands today, a UN agency ravaged by greed and financial misappropriations, propitious to the flourishing of abuse of power, corruption and nepotism. Watch this site.

UNESCO
                        debased

***

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Past (and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
 Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for